echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Food News > Food Articles > A Harvard University study has one-sidedly unfairly criticized the logo of whole grain foods and proposed unreasonable alternative standards

    A Harvard University study has one-sidedly unfairly criticized the logo of whole grain foods and proposed unreasonable alternative standards

    • Last Update: 2021-02-04
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    The Whole Grains Council noted serious flaws in a Harvard study challenging the value of whole grain food labels, which even imposed virtual functions on whole grain food labels.Cynthia Harriman
    , director of theFood and Nutrition Strategy Committee, said in response to a question from
    FoodNavigator

    that the online advance publication of the study on Public Nutrition and Health is no doubt adding to the problem by proposing another set of criteria for identifying healthier whole grain products, some of which are currently considered grain-free."Consumers may be misled by whole grain food labeling, which implies some health benefits wrote , a researcher at the Harvard School of Public Health who selected
    545,
    products from all cereals sold in
    Walmart
    and
    Stop and Shop
    supermarkets, according to the U.S. The
    5
    different standards recommended by the Ministry of Agriculture (
    USDA
    ) are analyzed to help consumers identify cereals: 1
    , whole grain foods with the whole grain logo on the packaging, each containing at least
    8
    g
    cereal ingredients (recommended by the Whole Grain Council, an industry-supporting non-governmental organization).2
    , any cereal must label the cereal ingredients in the first item of the ingredients list (
    USDA's MyPlate
    recommendation).added
    sweeteners to 3 whole grains and whole grain foods should be noted in the first three ingredients lists (USDA's MyPlate
    recommended).4
    the word "full" anywhere in the product ingredients list should be placed before "grain" (
    2010

    usda's
    recommended dietary guidelines for Americans).5
    , the product must meet the ratio of
    10:
    :
    1
    (total carbohydrate to dietary fiber ratio is less than
    10
    :
    1
    ), which is similar to the ratio of carbohydrate to dietary fiber in whole wheat flour (recommended by the American Heart Association).the authors argue that consumers may be misled by the health benefits mentioned in whole grain-labeled foods, noting that whole grain-labeled cereals have higher sugar content and energy.theWhole Grains Council noted that the study's definition of "whole grain ingredients" was based on an outdated and inaccurate list of ingredients containing
    29,
    ingredients, including wheat bran, which
    USDA
    has not recognized."Our study is designed to question the usefulness of industry-supported whole grain labels and the dietary standards recommended to the public by
    USDA
    , and we are looking for more accurate identification of whole grain foods." At the same time, the word "full" on the ingredients list does not guarantee how healthy the food is, nor does it indicate how much grain is in it.because the word 'full' is everywhere on the label ingredient list, but what exactly is the standard? The study also found that some refined foods with very little grain content were also labeled whole grains. They : "The American Heart Association's standards are considered the best indicator of nutritional health. Foods that meet this ratio are healthier, with more dietary fiber, lower trans fats, sugars, and sodium, and products that do not meet this ratio tend to have higher calories.""Our study aims to question the usefulness of the industry-supported whole grain logo the researchers concluded, and their findings could help consumers, food service providers, and policymakers choose healthier whole grain foods."Based on total carbohydrate: dietary fiber≤
    10:1
    such a standard would be more useful in determining whole grain foods., you can also help consumers find healthy foods faster and easier by using text or icons on their packaging.The comparison between apples and pears is not the same
    Harriman
    of the Whole Grains Council argues that the whole grain logo is nothing more than an indication of whether cereals contain enough grain ingredients. It never implies product health, and it's not realistic from a supervisory point of view. The study imposed a whole grain mark on the nihility of the sub-functionality. Most frustratingly, when the authors compared products with and without whole grain marks, they were not comparing them at all. They can't compare oat rolls with bread without whole grain marks. At the same time, such as pasta, oatmeal, rice and other large areas of food with the whole grain logo, they are not tested.the samples they studied were simply not representative, and of the
    49,
    products marked with the whole grain mark, they selected only
    10,
    of them, so the study was not comprehensive at all.If cereal products are evaluated using the
    10:1
    standard, many products have little or no whole grain eligibility

    addition to the above facts, this is not logical, it is not possible to
    the FDA
    of regulation."We often eat
    14,
    whole grain foods, of which
    ,
    are sorghum, cornmeal, wild rice and brown rice, all of which do not meet the
    10:1
    standard.If this ratio is used, many foods with low or no grain content are classified as cereals and some foods that are clearly whole grains are classified as non-grain foods.authors also claim that
    10:1
    system also helps highlight the health benefits of less sugar in products, but this is not true., for example, all brans are
    23:10
    , but they contain no grain ingredients,
    6
    g
    sugar per serving, and brown rice (
    25:1
    ), which consists mainly of grains, but contains only
    1

    sugar per serving.Potassium Salt Biscuits (
    23:3
    ) contain only a small amount of grain but

    230
    mg



    sodium per serving;rise and prosperity of whole grains according to data released at last fall's
    Every Plate
    conference, there are now more than
    7,600
    species in
    35,
    countries and regions The product has a grain logo, and the
    number of whole grain products increased from
    164,
    in
    to

    3378

    in
    2011.delegates told reporters that the bottom line of products marked by whole grains is
    8
    g
    grain ingredients per serving, most products today contain significantly more content, almost
    2/3
    of the product even contains double the components.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.