echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Infection > American woman: Didn't expect to do a nucleic acid test, all the savings to be hollowed out.

    American woman: Didn't expect to do a nucleic acid test, all the savings to be hollowed out.

    • Last Update: 2020-10-10
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Some U.S. states and cities are opening free testing stations, but many people have been told by insurance companies to pay between a few dollars and thousands of dollars for medical care, the New York Times reported recently.
    Kelly Daisley received a bill of $2,718 ($18,000) after completing a nucleic acid test.
    , nucleic acid testing costs $210 and the remaining $2,508 is a "laboratory service fee".
    the U.S. Congress had previously legislated to require insurers to pay for testing, but in practice, insurers interpreted the new policy in their favor.
    , for example, her insurance company is willing to pay only for nucleic acid testing, while other test-related service charges are not.
    Before the nucleic acid test, Daisley never thought he'd have to pay such a large sum, "I've seen a lot of ads saying the test is free or doesn't even require health insurance."
    Ms. Desley is not alone in her free nucleic acid testing ad at a bus stop in Brooklyn, New York (Photo: The New York Times) Ms. Goldstone, from Massachusetts, pays $266 a month for insurance, but after her nucleic acid test, she pays $250 for a "doctor's visit" and the insurance company reimburses her $160 for the test.
    A California woman said in an interview that her daughter's nucleic acid test was reimbursed by insurance companies, but that she would have to pay an additional $49 for "overtime" -- a nucleic acid test that the station says only available at night to avoid infecting other patients.
    comes after a New York Times investigation into the "new medical costs of pneumonia" in the United States revealed that Janet Mendes, who was discharged from the hospital, had more than $400,000 in medical bills.
    the hospital had about $320,000 in financial aid relief, she still had to pay more than $75,000.
    the White House outbreak has led to concerns that Washington residents are lining up to test for nucleic acid, and while they may receive sky-high bills for nucleic acid testing, some Americans do.
    3,962 nucleic acid tests were conducted in Washington, D.C., on Friday, up 81 percent from last week, national public radio reported.
    D.S. resident Megan Peterman, who tested positive for nucleic acid on The 6th local time, said, "Recently many White House officials have confirmed new corona pneumonia, and White House staff may have come to my store to shop, which is scary to be honest."
    " National Public Radio reported that a White House reporter, who did not want to be named, also tested positive for nucleic acid, saying that after the diagnosis of President Trump and others, White House staff did not provide information or advice about the outbreak to those "potentially infected" people, "who are irresponsible and do nothing about what happened, and we only know that we may be infected."
    "White House press secretary Michael McNerney has said, the White House will not voluntarily disclose exactly how many officials have been confirmed for personal privacy reasons.
    CNN that all confirmed White House officials are currently exposed by the media.
    105 new confirmed cases were reported in Washington, D.C., the highest number since June, and the White House's new confirmed cases were not included in the number of new confirmed cases in Washington, the Capitol Hill Newspaper reported.
    is not sure whether the increase in cases is linked to the White House outbreak, and experts worry that the virus may have spread in the capital and affected surrounding cities.
    CCTV News Client Source: CCTV News Client Copyright Notice: All text, images and audio and video materials that indicate "Source: Mets Medicine" or "Source: MedSci Originals" on this website belong to Mets Medical, which is not authorized, and any media, website or individual may not reproduce, and the authorised reprint must indicate "Source: Mets Medicine".
    all reprinted articles on this website are for the purpose of transmitting more information and clearly indicate the source and author, and media or individuals who do not wish to be reproduced may contact us and we will delete them immediately.
    reproduce content at the same time does not represent the position of this site.
    leave a message here.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.