echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Food News > Food Articles > Birds and bees: winners and losers in the pesticide trade

    Birds and bees: winners and losers in the pesticide trade

    • Last Update: 2021-04-16
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com


    Increasing use of neonicotinoid insecticides is harming pollinators, such as bees in pumpkin flowers.


    Image source: KONRAD WOTHE/"Science"

    The farm is the battlefield, and the endless and costly battles between the growers and pests and weeds often involve "chemical weapons.


    A large study documented the dramatic changes that have taken place in recent decades when American farmers have changed their "chemical weapons arsenal"-birds and mammals are better off, while pollinators and aquatic invertebrates have suffered severe losses.


    "These trends show significant changes in toxicity over time.


    In recent decades, the use of pesticides in the United States has fallen by about 40%.


    Schulz and his collaborators started their research from the pesticide use data reported by American farmers from 1992 to 2016 by the U.


    The good news is that from 1992 to 2016, the total toxicity of birds and mammals dropped by more than 95%.


    However, for some pesticides and species, estimating their impact on the real world is very difficult.


    Plants are also affected.


    There is even a crop that has been genetically engineered to reduce the use of pesticides-genetically modified corn containing an insecticidal chemical called Bacillus thuringiensis-and its toxicity is rapidly increasing.


    Schulz hopes that the study will help policymakers and others consider the complexity of pest and weed control, as well as the choice of wild species, in order to reduce unintentional harm.


    Tooker pointed out that the increased toxicity of plants and aquatic invertebrates may lead to a decrease in the diversity of habitats and food resources, and eventually affect animal populations, which may cause losses.


    Edward Perry, an agricultural economist at Kansas State University in Manhattan, said that in the end, these decisions boil down to how society evaluates various species.


    Related article information: org/10.


    org/10.
    1126/science.
    abe1148" target="_blank">https://doi.
    org/10.
    1126/science.
    abe1148
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.