BMJ: Robot vs laparoscopic abdominal palliation repair with patient prognosis.

!---- researchers recently compared the effects of robotic abdominal repair and laparoscopic repair on the number of days a patient was hospitalized after surgerystudy was conducted at the multidisciplinary argon clinic in Houston, USA, with 124 patients with minimally invasive abdominal synia performing, and randomly received robotic abdominal amortis (n-65) or laparoscopic abdominal repair (n-59)main result was the number of days spent in hospital within 90 days of surgerysecondary results include emergency visits, surgery time, wound complications, recurrence of radon, resurgery, abdominal wall quality of life, and the cost of the health care systemthe two groups of patients were similar at baseline tests123 (99%) patients completed 90-day follow-upthere was no significant difference in the number of days of hospitalization in the two groups of(median 0.90)there was no difference in the rate of inter-group emergency department visits, wound complications, recurrence of radon, or resurgery in the case of secondary results, but the duration of the operation for robotic repair was longer (141 v 77 min; average difference was 62.89 min), and the medical cost was higher ($15,865 v$12955; cost ratio was 1.21; the adjusted absolute cost difference was $2767)in the robot groin repair surgery patients, 2 cases had a bowel incision, while the laparoscopic repair group did notthe median improvement score of abdominal wall quality of life in 1 month after surgery, the robot abdominal repair group was 3 points, and the laparoscopic repair group was 15 pointsstudies have found no significant difference in the number of days of hospitalization in the 90 days after surgery, but the surgical time and medical costs required for robotic repair have increased significantly.