Clinical Nutrition: Four-grind soup oral solution and dopamine suspension assist the helix nasal intestinal tube hetero-door rear tube: a multi-center randomized non-shoddy test.

Gastric-powered medicine to assist the claustrophobic rear tube is a traditional strategy.
, however, due to the limited use of polypanosterone suspension, oral gastric-boosting drugs are relatively rare.
study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the four-grind soup oral solution-assisted helical nasal intestinal tube helium rear tube as an alternative to polyptonoid suspension.
conducted this forward-looking, open, parallel, non-inefficient randomized controlled trial at the ICU of six university-affiliated hospitals in China from September 2017 to May 2019.
Subjects were randomly assigned to the four-grind soup group or the multi-panlitone group, the four-mill soup group every 8 hours to the four-grind soup oral liquid 20 ml nasal feeding, the multi-penlitone group every 6 hours to the multi-pentamine suspension 20 mg, that is, 20 ml, both groups of drug intervention 24 hours.
the main outcome index is the success rate of the heliophobic rear tube, i.e. the helical nasal intestinal tube is placed 24 hours later by abdominal flat sheet confirmed that the end of the tube position in the first section of the duoon intestine or after it.
268 patients were assessed during the study period, of whom 224 were in the group and randomly assigned to the four-mill soup group or the polypamponone group (112 in each group).
analysis was used in the study, the success rate of the claustrophobic rear tube in the four-grind soup group was 41.1% (46/112) and that of the dopamine group was 47.3% (53/112) (the success rate difference between the two groups was -6.3%, The 95% confidence interval is -19.2% to 6.7%, the error rate difference of correction is -3.7%, and the correction 95% confidence interval is -16.3% to 9.0%), which intersects with the non-poor effect boundary value of 10% set by the study.
After the first paragraph of the duobium intestine between the two groups (the tube end is in the second stage of the duobium or after it), after the second paragraph of the duobium (after the third paragraph of the duobium), after the third paragraph of the duobium (after the tube end is in the fourth stage of the duobium intestine or after it), there was no statistical difference in the success rate of the near end of the empty intestine, the total adverse event rate, the number of days of ICU hospitalization, and the mortality rate of the ICU.
conclusion: the effect of the four-grind soup oral solution assisting the helical nasal intestinal tube helium rear tube is not inferior to that of multipanlitone suspension has not been confirmed.
: Simo decoction versus domperidone for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: A multicenter, randomized, non-classity trial, Published: November 12, 2019DOI: Source: MedSci Original !-- Content Presentation End - !-- To determine whether the login is over.