echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Coauthor: young scientists have long been "green leaves" for senior scholars

    Coauthor: young scientists have long been "green leaves" for senior scholars

    • Last Update: 2017-11-12
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Scientific research is a complex and arduous collective work, and cooperation is a basic and common feature in scientific research In the past, scientific research was in a state of relative dispersion and lack of organization Scientific research was mainly completed by a few scientists independently However, with the development of scientific research, the complexity and interdisciplinary characteristics of science make scientists more and more inclined to cooperate with each other in scientific research How to measure the contribution of each participant in scientific research cooperation is an important research issue According to the results of a recent global research report, young scholars are facing the problem of "infringement" in their career, because more and more senior scientific circles, as co authors of papers, occupy too much space for young authors In the field of natural science, major breakthroughs, growth points of new disciplines, and even the emergence of new disciplines are often formed in the process of different disciplines crossing and infiltrating each other It is very frequent for papers in the field of natural science to be co authored by two or more researchers For example, among the four scientists who have made great contributions to the discovery of DNA double helix structure, Watson (Biology), Crick and Wilkins (Physics) and Franklin (Chemistry) have different disciplinary backgrounds, but they are all committed to studying the molecular structure of genetic materials, and the collision of different scientific knowledge and thinking mode has produced important knowledge contributions Similarly, a survey of 894 researchers in the humanities and Social Sciences in 62 countries shows that co-operation is becoming more common in these areas About 74% of the respondents said that there are usually more than two authors in their professional literature, and more than half of the respondents believe that CO creation is more common now than in their early career Professor Bruce MacFarlane (source: Southampton education school) Professor Bruce MacFarlane, the author of the report, said that the most common problem related to co authors is to determine the order of authors' names and decide who should be the first author Because it is very important to rank the authors in academic papers If a person does not publish a first author paper, there may be some resistance when the evaluation committee reviews the resume of an academic The invitation of speech and review also depends on the first author Macfarlane's Paper Co authorship in the humanities and Social Sciences presents evidence of the gap between reality and ideals in terms of academic expectations He pointed out that in practical research, the burden of senior researchers, doctoral supervisors or applicants for research grants is too heavy As a result, young researchers are sometimes excluded Some young scholars believe that it is good for their career to share the rights of authors with more senior scholars But the opposite may be true Even if the reality is that young scholars have made more contributions to intelligence and physical strength in time, people often think that more senior scholars have made more contributions to the publication of papers This phenomenon is not only academic, but also economic to young scholars For example, in some universities in China, the bonus of interdisciplinary achievements is 1.5 times of that of non interdisciplinary achievements; the second author of interdisciplinary cooperation achievements in the university is also recognized to some extent, and only the first author and corresponding author are recognized for non interdisciplinary cooperation achievements In this kind of cooperation, each participant's contribution distribution method is simple and rough The first author often gets much more bonus from the school than other participants Although the results of the survey show that the researchers believe that seniority should not affect the order of the list of authors, according to the experience of several interviewees, this is not the case A US scientist replied that the president and department head often asked for a preview of the paper and put themselves on the list as collaborators Another finding of the study is that only 18% of researchers have received guidance or training on CO authorship issues Macfarlane said the issue of CO authorship should be made clear early in the project to avoid disputes or dissatisfaction The author's ranking is affected by many factors The ranking should not follow the academic hierarchy, but should be determined by the amount of intellectual or other research contributions.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.