echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Medical News > Latest Medical News > Does the NCBI support lianhua Qing plague cure the new crown - God-making or disinformation?

    Does the NCBI support lianhua Qing plague cure the new crown - God-making or disinformation?

    • Last Update: 2020-09-27
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Introduction: The National Biotechnology Information Center of the United States issued a paper, even flower plague treatment of the new crown effect is significant?! In recent days, there have been intermittent "positive energy" users to publicize: the National Biotechnology Information Center has issued a message, even flower plague treatment of the new crown effect is remarkable! In the Sino-US trade friction, the United States all kinds of crackdown on domestic enterprises in the background, suddenly jumped out of such a line, the United States actually recognized us? It feels quite novel.
    but is the news true? In fact, the caller's message came from a Report on August 14th by a Philippine news website.
    (sect link:) The report is time-related to the lianhua-clearing plague that was approved in the Philippines at the time.
    by the announcement issued by Ering Pharmaceuticals on August 11th, Lianhua Qing plague capsule has been approved by the Philippine Food and Drug Administration for drug registration, qualified to sell the product as a drug in the Philippine market, product categories include: help eliminate lung fever, including fever, chills, muscle soreness, nasal congestion, runny nose and other symptoms.
    looking back at this article, if you don't know a very well about this, seeing the NCIBI might think that the National Biotechnology Information Center is such a great institution, even this institution has come to endorsement, can it be false? In fact, the National Biotechnology Information Center (NCBI), part of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), is a database of papers that function like a knowledge network and can be uploaded by research individuals or teams, not that every paper included is the official opinion of the NCBI.
    even more confusing is that the entire article misstated NCBI, the acronym for the National Biotechnology Information Center, as NCIB.
    look at the research data published in the article and retrieve it from the NCBI, is the result somewhat familiar? Search results: This is the same as Zhong Nanshan team study of the efficacy of Lianhua Qing plague article ah.
    The study was published in the International Journal of Botany in May -- clinical data show that lianhua clear plague can effectively improve the clinical cure rate, for fever, fatigue, cough and other symptoms of the treatment of obvious, and high safety.
    The results show that, on the basis of conventional treatment, the combined use of lianhua qing plague capsules for 14 days can significantly improve the rate of improvement of clinical symptoms of neocyclinds, significantly improve the imaging lesions of the lungs, shorten the duration of symptoms, and improve the rate of clinical cure.
    , the paper says, there was no significant difference in the treatment of lily fever in reducing the conversion rate of severe cases and increasing the conversion rate of viral detection.
    is not reported by individual media at all, the new crown has the same as the sky-dropping soldiers of the super-powerful effect.
    , there is a very obvious misdirection in this report.
    conclusion, which was originally drawn from a paper published on the NCBI, changed to "NCBI indicates" and "NCBI indicates" and has a sense of falsehood.
    seems to be misleading readers about how authoritative the NCBI is as an authoritative medical research institution.
    Overall, this article is divided into two parts: the first part lends the name of the NCBI to their own endorsement, proving that Lianhua Qing plague in the new corona treatment has a good effect; Manila Embassy stated ah, hope that even the flower clear plague can help the Philippines anti-epidemic "to take the platform, finally showed that we can be very, very cautious ah, even the flower clear plague also need to pass the Department of Health's safety assessment ah, manufacturers and distributors should not label "anti-COVID words" and so on.
    In addition to the website's August 13 report that the Philippines is using Lianhua Qing plague treatment for minor illness patients, plans to introduce Russia's "Satellite 5" vaccine, President Duterte will participate in vaccination, combined with the 14th "hard pinch" out of the article, the main role may still be to stabilize the hearts of the people.
    , more than 150,000 cases have been confirmed in the Philippines, 2,442 deaths and 71,405 cases have been cured, Xinhua reported on August 14.
    as of August 25, the Philippines had confirmed a cumulative total of 194,000.
    the beginning and end of this event can be roughly summed up, the Philippine media in August quoted the United States database Chinese May to do research to promote, and now back home by some people to bake a certain pride.
    as for the transmission to the domestic, derived from what the U.S. National Biological Information Center issued a message, even flower clear plague effective, to the United States recommended the use of even flower clear plague ... ... A series of more and more evil variants of "positive energy" is really a bit inexplicable.
    even huaqing plague would not have been antiviral drugs, but partial to some people to god-making that aspect of guidance.
    Some people deliberately shape the image of even the flowering plague as "foreigners look good", or even the flower-clearing plague into an "anti-epidemic god medicine", in the end really hope that Chinese medicine out of the country, or what other intentions?
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.