-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Ingredient
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Recently, a "Internet plus medical health" research center assessed 13 Internet treatment platform found that is to do consulting or consultation, many platform positioning is vague. The survey found that after an online consultation without the patient submitting any medical records, three platforms issued prescriptions, all provided medication advice, and five pushed the drug purchase link directly. Experts say some of these behaviors are playing "scrubbing balls" and that in the event of a medical accident, it is difficult for patients to hold the platform accountable. However, some experts believe that the decision on whether to make a first visit should be left to the doctor, not the regulator.
mid-September, the National Health Board issued three regulatory documents, and the boots of the Internet's medical code landed. Among them, the Measures for the Administration of Internet Diagnosis and Treatment stipulates that physicians should have the patient's medical records and determine that after the patient has been explicitly diagnosed as one or more common or chronic diseases in an entity medical institution, he or she may be re-diagnosed with the same diagnosis. When a patient's condition changes require medical personnel to see him personally, the Internet consultation activities should be immediately terminated and the patient should be directed to the physical medical institutions.
have norms, they should follow the rules. However, many Internet treatment platforms still act in accordance with the original habits, do not consult the patient's medical records, or even without consultation to prescribe, initial and follow-up consultations do not distinguish, etc. , 3 normative documents have not yet played its due binding role.
in particular, the three documents went through a long process of argumentation and consultation before they were launched, determining that Internet consultations were not allowed for the time being, and that they also went through repeated arguments. At this point, if it is suggested that the first consultation should not be banned in a one-size-fits-all, it is clearly anachronistic to leave the decision on whether or not to make a first visit to a doctor. Do not rule out allowing the first diagnosis has its reasons, but also to see that the temporary not allowing the first consultation is to ensure the safety of diagnosis and treatment, follow the rules of diagnosis and treatment, gradually promote the Internet diagnosis and treatment of pragmatic and prudent action. What is more, all three documents are pilot versions and there are many opportunities for adjustment in the future. It should now be implemented on the basis of this version, and the views of the parties should be retained for the time being, otherwise it would affect the authority of the norms and the consistency of action.
the beginning of the introduction of norms is the best time to unify action and correct bad practices, missed this opportunity, it is easy to develop new bad habits and even subliminal rules, then to correct will do more than half the work. Therefore, at the beginning of the introduction of the Internet consultation and treatment norms, more efforts should be made to strengthen the implementation and supervision, from the beginning to maintain the authority of the norms, so as to bring the Internet diagnosis and treatment into the right track as soon as possible. (Health News)