-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Ingredient
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Table 9-12 is mainly based on the design data in Table 9-11 and the research results of STOWA and Elissen (see Table 9-13), and estimates the annual savings of sludge reduction by worms in the above-mentioned small wastewater treatment plants, mainly indicating the savings Where does it come from at most? It does not include the cost saved by the reduction in the size of the required sludge treatment equipment (the maintenance cost is reduced), but this part of the content should be included in the further detailed economic feasibility study
.
Table 9-12 35,000 (population equivalent) small sewage plants use worms to reduce the cost of sludge savings.
Statistical unit: 1,000 euros/year
It can be seen that worm reduction of sludge only saves a small part of the cost, and the greatest effect comes from the transportation of concentrated sludge, because the concentration of worm dung after concentration is twice the original sludge concentration
.
Although the reduction in biogas production offset some of the savings, the savings in sludge dewatering and transportation of dewatered sludge exceeded the offset.
In addition, the reduction in the amount of incineration further reduced the incineration cost
The value of worms has a great influence on the economics of worm reactors
.
According to Table 9-12, the output value of worms per kilogram of dry weight is 1 Euro, the cost of worm reactor infrastructure is 395,000 Euros, and the production of 80 kg of dry weight worms per day is calculated.
Table 9-13 Unit cost of applying worm reactor