echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > EU: Levatinib combined with everolimus has a good anti-cancer effect on non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

    EU: Levatinib combined with everolimus has a good anti-cancer effect on non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

    • Last Update: 2021-08-26
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com



     Recently, the European Journal of Urology (EU) published a phase II multicenter single-arm trial evaluating the results of lenvatinib (Lenvatinib) combined with everolimus (Everolimus) in the treatment of patients with advanced nccRCC, showing that the treatment plan has Good anti-cancer activity, and safety is consistent with established safety


    Research methods

    Research Method Research Method
    Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria

    Pathologically confirmed as nccRCC

    Previous exposure to lenvatinib or mTOR inhibitors

    Have not received relevant anti-cancer treatment

    Will undergo major surgery within three weeks of starting the medication

    ECOG PS score is 0 or 1

    Uncontrollable diabetes

    Good blood pressure control

    Proteinuria (1g/24h)

    Liver, kidney, and bone marrow function are normal

    Interstitial lung disease

     

    Active non-infectious pneumonia

     

    Anything that affects the absorption of the study drug

    Inclusion criteria andexclusion criteria


    Previous exposure to lenvatinib or mTOR inhibitors


    Will undergo major surgery within three weeks of starting the medication


    Uncontrollable diabetes


    Proteinuria (1g/24h)


    Interstitial lung disease




    Previous exposure to lenvatinib or mTOR inhibitors

    Pathologically confirmed as nccRCC

    Pathologically confirmed as nccRCC

    Previous exposure to lenvatinib or mTOR inhibitors

    Previous exposure to lenvatinib or mTOR inhibitors

    Have not received relevant anti-cancer treatment

    Will undergo major surgery within three weeks of starting the medication

    Have not received relevant anti-cancer treatment

    Have not received relevant anti-cancer treatment

    Will undergo major surgery within three weeks of starting the medication

    Will undergo major surgery within three weeks of starting the medication

    ECOG PS score is 0 or 1

    Uncontrollable diabetes

    ECOG PS score is 0 or 1

    ECOG PS score is 0 or 1

    Uncontrollable diabetes

    Uncontrollable diabetes

    Good blood pressure control

    Proteinuria (1g/24h)

    Good blood pressure control

    Good blood pressure control

    Proteinuria (1g/24h)

    Proteinuria (1g/24h)

    Liver, kidney, and bone marrow function are normal

    Interstitial lung disease

    Liver, kidney, and bone marrow function are normal

    Liver, kidney, and bone marrow function are normal

    Interstitial lung disease

    Interstitial lung disease



    Active non-infectious pneumonia



    Anything that affects the absorption of the study drug

    drug

    drug

    Enrolled patients received lenvatinib(18 mg orally, once a day) plus everolimus (5 mg orally, once a day) for 28 consecutive days, as long as there is evidence of clinical benefit, or until complications Disease, unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or patient withdrawal from the study


    Le Laval imatinib everolimus

     

    Observation index

    Observed indicators observed indicators

    Main result

    Main result

    Objective response rate (ORR): The objective response rate refers to the proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk to a certain amount and maintained for a certain period of time, including cases of complete remission and partial remission
    .

    Refers to the proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk to a certain amount and maintained for a certain period of time, including cases of complete remission and partial remission
    .

    Secondary result

    Secondary result

    1.
    Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS);

    2.
    The PFS and ORR of the independent imaging examination (IIR) are also used as exploratory endpoints (imaging examinations are performed every eight weeks);

    3.
    Clinical benefit rate (CBR, defined as complete remission, partial remission, or sustained [>23 weeks]] the proportion of patients with the best overall remission of stable disease);

    4.
    Disease control rate {DCR is defined as the proportion of patients with the best overall remission (complete remission, partial remission, or stable disease))}
    .

    5.
    Safety Evaluate safety by monitoring and recording all adverse events

     

    result

    Result result

    Basic situation of the patient

    Basic situation of the patient

    The study included 31 patients with nccRCC, and all patients received study treatment
    .

    Most patients had papillary renal cell carcinoma (n = 20/31; 65%), followed by chromophobe cell carcinoma (n = 9/31; 29%), unclassified (n = 2/31; 6%) nccRCC
    .
    Among the enrolled patients, the median age was 64 years, and about two-thirds were men (65%)
    .
    The ECOG PS of most patients was 0 (n = 23/31; 74%), and less than half of them had undergone nephrectomy (n = 11/31; 35%)
    .
    Lymph nodes are the most common site of metastasis (n = 22/31; 71%)
    .

    As of the data cutoff date (July 17, 2019), 6 patients (19%) are still on treatment, and 25 patients (81%) have stopped the study, including treatment of radiation or clinical disease progression (n = 15/31; 48 %), adverse events (n = 6/31; 19%), patients opted out (n = 4/31; 13%); but there are still 8 patients in the study follow-up
    .

     

     

    Treatment result

    Treatment result

    The best overall response with partial response was observed in 8 patients, and no patient confirmed complete response
    .

    The researchers and IIR assessed the overall ORR of the patients were both 26% (95% CI 12-45)
    .
    According to the researchers' evaluation, 18 patients were in stable condition, and the DCR was 84%
    .
    In 11 patients, persistent (≥23 weeks) stable disease was observed, of which CBR (complete remission, partial remission or persistent stable) accounted for 61%
    .
    In contrast, the DCR and CBR of IIR are 71% and 52%, respectively
    .
     

     

    The median duration of response cannot be estimated (NE); however, according to IIR, the majority (88%) of responders (ie, complete or partial responders) lasted for 5 months
    .
    Among the 20 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma, 3 patients had partial remission with an ORR of 15% (n = 3/20), and the other 14 patients were in stable condition with a DCR of 85% (n = 17/20, the researchers assessed )
    .

    Among the 4 patients with chromophobe cell carcinoma, the ORR was 44% (n = 4/9), and the other 3 patients were in stable condition with a DCR of 78% (n = 7/9; researcher's assessment)
    .
    Among the two unclassified ncccc patients in this study, one had a partial remission and one had a stable condition
    .

     

    The researchers assessed that the median PFS was 9.
    2 months and the median OS was 15.
    6 months (as shown in the figure below); through IIR, the median PFS was 5.
    6 months
    .

    Safety results

    Safety results

    All patients experienced at least one treatment emergency adverse event ( TEAE )
    .

    All patients experienced at least one treatment emergency adverse event ( TEAE )
    .

    The five most common TEAEs (any grade) are fatigue (71%), diarrhea (58%), decreased appetite (55%), nausea (55%) and vomiting (52%)
    .
    Events with TEAE ≥ grade 3 occurred in 68% of patients
    .

    The five most common TEAEs (any grade) are fatigue (71%), diarrhea (58%), decreased appetite (55%), nausea (55%) and vomiting (52%)
    .
    Events with TEAE ≥ grade 3 occurred in 68% of patients
    .

     

     

    TEAEs led to drug withdrawal or withdrawal in 32% of patients (n = 10/31; 1 each for cardiac arrest, heart failure, arthralgia, back pain, cancer pain, hepatic encephalopathy, and tremor; 3 cases were malignant tumor progression)
    .

    TEAEs led to drug withdrawal or withdrawal in 32% of patients (n = 10/31; 1 each for cardiac arrest, heart failure, arthralgia, back pain, cancer pain, hepatic encephalopathy, and tremor; 3 cases were malignant tumor progression)
    .

     

     

    TEAEs results in 45% (n = 14/31) to reduce the dosage to the patient (only music cutting imatinib ), 68% (n = 21/31 ) patients with drug interrupt ( Le Laval gefitinib and / or everolimus)
    .

    TEAEs resulted in a dose reduction (only ) in 45% (n = 14/31) of patients, and drug discontinuation ( and/or everolimus ) in 68% (n = 21/31) of patients .

    In general, music cutting erlotinib in patients relative dose intensity was 87% (range 32-100%), depending on the relative position of everolimus dose intensity was 94% (range 64-100%)
    .

    Overall, the median relative dose intensity of patients was 87% (range 32-100%), and the median relative dose intensity of everolimus was 94% (range 64-100%)
    .

    Treatment-related TEAEs occurred in 94% of patients, and 48% of patients had at least one  grade ≥3 TEAE event; 3 fatal TEAEs (2 cases of malignant tumor progression and 1 case of cardiac arrest)
    .

    Treatment-related TEAEs occurred in 94% of patients, and 48% of patients had at least one  grade ≥3 TEAE event; 3 fatal TEAEs (2 cases of malignant tumor progression and 1 case of cardiac arrest)
    .

    in conclusion

    Conclusion conclusion

    The combination drug showed good anti-cancer activity, the overall ORR rate was 26%, the median OS evaluated by the researchers was 15.
    6 months, the median PFS was 9.
    2 months, and the median PFS evaluated by the IIR was 5.
    6 months
    .

    The combination drug showed good anticancer activity, the overall ORR rate was 26%, the median OS evaluated by the researchers was 15.
    6 months, the median PFS was 9.
    2 months, and the median PFS evaluated by the IIR was 5.
    6 months
    .


    Leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.