-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Ingredient
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
Previously, the LAP-01 trial conducted by researchers from the University of Leipzig in Germany and other units demonstrated that robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) was superior to conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in terms of urinary incontinence after 3 months
In the present trial, they further compared RARP and LRP for voiding capacity, sexual intercourse, and oncological outcomes at 12 months of follow-up
RARP and LRP were further compared for voiding capacity, sexual intercourse, and oncological outcomes at 12-month follow-up
In this multicenter, randomized, patient-blind controlled trial, patients referred for radical prostatectomy at four hospitals in Germany were randomized 3:1 to receive RARP or LRP
Figure 1 Urinary incontinence after 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up
Figure 1 Urinary incontinence after 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up
Robotic assistance provides better functional results in specific areas Robotic assistance provides better functional results in specific areas
Original source:
Original source:Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg , Sigrun Holze , Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa Arthanareeswaran et al.
Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg , Sigrun Holze , Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa Arthanareeswaran et al.
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: 12-month Outcomes of the Multicentre Randomised Controlled LAP-01 Trial.
Eur Urol Focus.
Feb 2022.
Leave a Comment
