echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Front Oncol: Exploration of the efficacy of different treatment strategies for patients with MET amplification after EGFR-TKI treatment progresses in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients

    Front Oncol: Exploration of the efficacy of different treatment strategies for patients with MET amplification after EGFR-TKI treatment progresses in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients

    • Last Update: 2021-10-10
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    The standard treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer is EGFR-TKI inhibitors
    .


    But it is inevitable that the problem of drug resistance


    The standard treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer is EGFR-TKI inhibitors


    The study included patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations who were treated in the hospital between March 2015 and March 2020
    .


    All patients received first-line or second-line treatment with EGFR-TKI, NGS analysis was performed after progression, and patients with EGFR mutations and MET amplification were subjected to final analysis


    The study included patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations who were treated in the hospital between March 2015 and March 2020


    A total of 70 patients were included in the study, of which 38 were treated with EGFR-TKI+crizotinib, 10 were treated with crizotinib alone, and 22 were treated with chemotherapy


    Among the 38 patients who received EGFR-TKI and crizotinib combination therapy, only 35 patients could be evaluated for efficacy


    Efficacy and prognosis

    Efficacy and prognosis

    The median real-world PFS (rwPFS) of patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib was compared with crizotinib monotherapy (5.
    0 vs.
    2.
    3 months; p = 0.
    007; HR = 0.
    88, 95% CI (0.
    42-2.
    42) ), adjusted p = 0.
    036) and chemotherapy (5.
    0 vs.
    2.
    9 months; p = 0.
    038; HR = 0.
    72, 95% CI (0.
    32, 2.
    06), adjusted p = 0.
    024) were significantly longer
    .


    However, the median OS of patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib was higher than that of crizotinib alone (10 vs.


    The median real-world PFS (rwPFS) of patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib was compared with crizotinib monotherapy (5.


    Patients with TP53 mutations, who received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib (n = 17) for median rwPFS bicrizotinib monotherapy (n = 8) (6.


                    Prognosis with TP53 mutation

    Prognosis with TP53 mutation

    The median rwPFS of patients with EGFR amplification who received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib (n = 13) was longer than that of crizotinib alone (5.
    0 vs 1.
    2 months, p = 0.
    017, adjp = 0.
    046), The median OS was also significantly longer (10.
    0 vs.
    3.
    0 months, p = 0.
    02, adjp = 0.
    019)
    .


    Compared with chemotherapy (n = 12) treatment, median rwPFS (5.


    The median rwPFS of patients with EGFR amplification who received EGFR-TKI + crizotinib (n = 13) was longer than that of crizotinib alone (5.


                     Prognosis of combined EGFR amplification

     Prognosis of combined EGFR amplification

    Potential acquired resistance mechanisms after EGFR-TKI+crizotinib treatment include: EGFR-T790M (n= 2), EGFR- 1718q (n=1), EGFR-s645c (n=1), MET-D1228H ( n=1), BRAF-V600E(n=1), NRAS-Q61H(n=1), KRAS-amp(n=1), ERBB2-amp(n=1), CDK4-amp(n=1), MYC-amp (n=1)
    .

    Potential acquired resistance mechanisms after EGFR-TKI+crizotinib treatment include: EGFR-T790M (n= 2), EGFR- 1718q (n=1), EGFR-s645c (n=1), MET-D1228H ( n=1), BRAF-V600E(n=1), NRAS-Q61H(n=1), KRAS-amp(n=1), ERBB2-amp(n=1), CDK4-amp(n=1), MYC-amp (n=1)
    .


    The most common treatment-related toxicities are neutropenia (n = 16, 22.
    9%) and fatigue (n = 13, 18.
    6%)
    .
    In 38 patients treated with EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib, grade 1-2 neutropenia (n=5), grade 1-3 transaminase elevation (n=4), grade 1-2 vomiting (n=4), grade 1-2 diarrhea (n=4) and grade 1-3 rash (n=4) are the most common adverse reactions
    .
    Among the 10 patients who received crizotinib monotherapy, the most common adverse reactions were grade 1-2 vomiting (n = 3) and diarrhea (n = 2)
    .
    Among 22 patients who received chemotherapy, grade 1-3 neutropenia (n = 10) and fatigue (n = 8) were the most common adverse reactions
    .
    Six patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib (15.
    8%) and three patients receiving chemotherapy (13.
    6%) observed treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or above (p = 0.
    591)
    .
    No adverse events of grade IV, fatal or unexpected were observed
    .

    The most common treatment-related toxicities are neutropenia (n = 16, 22.
    9%) and fatigue (n = 13, 18.
    6%)
    .
    In 38 patients treated with EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib, grade 1-2 neutropenia (n=5), grade 1-3 transaminase elevation (n=4), grade 1-2 vomiting (n=4), grade 1-2 diarrhea (n=4) and grade 1-3 rash (n=4) are the most common adverse reactions
    .
    Among the 10 patients who received crizotinib monotherapy, the most common adverse reactions were grade 1-2 vomiting (n = 3) and diarrhea (n = 2)
    .
    Among 22 patients who received chemotherapy, grade 1-3 neutropenia (n = 10) and fatigue (n = 8) were the most common adverse reactions
    .
    Six patients receiving EGFR-TKI combined with crizotinib (15.
    8%) and three patients receiving chemotherapy (13.
    6%) observed treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or above (p = 0.
    591)
    .
    No adverse events of grade IV, fatal or unexpected were observed
    .

                      Adverse reactions

    Adverse reactions

    In summary, this real-world retrospective study table shows that dual inhibition of EGFR and MET may be an effective treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment resistance
    .

    In summary, this real-world retrospective study table shows that dual inhibition of EGFR and MET may be an effective treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment resistance
    .
    This real-world retrospective study table shows that dual inhibition of EGFR and MET may be an effective treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment of drug resistance
    .
    This real-world retrospective study table shows that dual inhibition of EGFR and MET may be an effective treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment of drug resistance
    .

    Original source:

    Original source:

    Liu L, Qu J, Heng J, Zhou C, Xiong Y, Yang H, Jiang W, Zeng L, Zhu S, Zhang Y, Tan J, Hu C, Deng P and Yang N (2021) A Large Real-World Study on the Effectiveness of the Combined Inhibition of EGFR and MET in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Development of EGFR-TKI Resistance.
    Front.
    Oncol.
    11:722039.
    doi: 10.
    3389/fonc.
    2021.
    722039

    Liu L, Qu J, Heng J, Zhou C, Xiong Y, Yang H, Jiang W, Zeng L, Zhu S, Zhang Y, Tan J, Hu C, Deng P and Yang N (2021) A Large Real-World Study on the Effectiveness of the Combined Inhibition of EGFR and MET in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Development of EGFR-TKI Resistance Front Oncol 11:.
    .
    .
    722039 doi:.
    10.
    3389 / fonc.
    2021.
    722039 in this message
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.