JAMA Surg: The impact of laparoscopic vs. robotic gastrectomy on the short-term prognosis of patients with gastric cancer

Minimally invasive surgery, represented by laparoscopic surgery, is widely usedTreatment of gastric cancer (GC)

Gastric infection recently researchers compared the effect on gastric cancer patients receiving short-term prognosis of robotic gastrectomy or laparoscopic gastrectomy

This study is a phase III study.

Of the 241 patients, 122 were randomly assigned to the LG group, and 119 patients were randomly assigned to the RG group

There was no significant difference in the incidence of intra-abdominal infection complications between the groups (10 out of 117 patients in the LG group [8.

The study believes that compared with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy, robotic gastrectomy does not reduce the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications for patients who are preparing for gastric cancer resection, but the overall risk of adverse events is reduced

For patients preparing for gastric cancer resection, compared with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy, robotic gastrectomy does not reduce the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications in patients, but the overall risk of adverse events is lower for preparing for gastric cancer resection Compared with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy, robotic gastrectomy does not reduce the risk of infectious complications in the abdominal cavity of patients after surgery, but the overall risk of adverse events is reduced

Original source:

Original source:

Toshiyasu Ojima et al.

Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Leave a message here