echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > JCO: Residual after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy versus capecitabine: a randomized phase III study (ECOG-ACRIN EA1131)

    JCO: Residual after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy versus capecitabine: a randomized phase III study (ECOG-ACRIN EA1131)

    • Last Update: 2021-06-10
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for about 15% of invasive breast cancer.


    Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for about 15% of invasive breast cancer.


    The study is a randomized phase III study, including II or III TNBC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with residual lesions greater than or equal to 1 cm, postoperative random allocation to receive platinum-based chemotherapy group and capecitabine group, platinum-based chemotherapy is There is a cycle every 21 days for a total of 4 cycles; while capecitabine is taken for 14 days with 7 days of rest, for a total of 6 cycles.


    The study is a randomized phase III study, including II or III TNBC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with residual lesions greater than or equal to 1 cm, postoperative random allocation to receive platinum-based chemotherapy group and capecitabine group, platinum-based chemotherapy is There is a cycle every 21 days for a total of 4 cycles; while capecitabine is taken for 14 days with 7 days of rest, for a total of 6 cycles.


    The study included 410 patients from 2015 to 2021, and 308 patients (78%) were basal TNBC.


    Among 308 patients with basal TNBC, the 3-year non-invasive disease progression (iDFS) of platinum therapy and capecitabine therapy were 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) and 49% (95% CI, 39), respectively.



    Different groups of iDFS



    Among 88 patients with non-basal TNBC, the 3-year non-invasive disease progression (iDFS) of platinum treatment and capecitabine treatment were 46% (95% CI, 25 to 65) and 69% (95% CI, 45 to 83), the hazard ratio HR=1.



    Efficacy evaluation

    The grade 3/4 toxicity (mostly anemia and leukopenia) in the platinum-based chemotherapy group was more common than capecitabine, at 26% (95% CI, 20 to 33) vs 15% (95% CI, 10 to 21) ).


    The grade 3/4 toxicity (mostly anemia and leukopenia) in the platinum-based chemotherapy group was more common than capecitabine, at 26% (95% CI, 20 to 33) vs 15% (95% CI, 10 to 21) ).


    In summary, compared with capecitabine adjuvant chemotherapy, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy cannot improve the prognosis of patients with residual basal TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).


    Original source:

    Ingrid A.


    Ingrid A.
    Mayer; Fengmin Zhao; Carlos L.
    Arteaga, et al.
    Randomized Phase III Postoperative Trial of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131.
    DOI: 10.
    1200/ JCO.
    21.
    00976 Journal of Clinical Oncology.
    Published online June 06, 2021.


    Leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.