-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Ingredient
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
For small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which treatment is more effective, surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA), remains unclear and controversial
For small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which treatment is more effective, surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA), remains unclear and controversial
The SURF study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at 49 centers in Japan
The SURF study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at 49 centers in Japan
During 2009-2015, 308 patients were enrolled
The median (range) follow-up period after enrollment was 5.
The median (range) follow-up period after enrollment was 5.
Differences in RFS between the two groups
The 3-year RFS rate in the surgery group was 54.
The 3-year RFS rate in the surgery group was 54.
There were 82 (54.
Two groups of recurrence patterns
Age (<60 vs >60 years), hepatitis C virus infection status, number of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules (single vs multiple), and largest hepatocellular carcinoma diameter (≤2.
Age (<60 vs >60 years), hepatitis C virus infection status, number of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules (single vs multiple), and largest hepatocellular carcinoma diameter (≤2.
Differences in stratified RFS between the two groups
In conclusion, this study shows that there is no significant difference in the efficacy of surgery and radiofrequency ablation for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
In conclusion, this study shows that there is no significant difference in the efficacy of surgery and radiofrequency ablation for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
.
The study showed that there was no significant difference in efficacy between surgery and radiofrequency ablation for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
.
The study showed that there was no significant difference in efficacy between surgery and radiofrequency ablation for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
.
Original source:
Original source:Takayama T, Hasegawa K, Izumi N, et al.
Surgery Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial (SURF-Trial).
Liver Cancer , DOI: 10.
1159/000521665.
Published online: December 29, 2021.
Surgery Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial (SURF-Trial).
Liver Cancer , DOI: 10.
1159/000521665.
Published online: December 29, 2021.
Available
here message