echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Biochemistry News > Biotechnology News > Nobel Prize-winning HIV discoverer Montanier throws out new crown virus man-made theory!

    Nobel Prize-winning HIV discoverer Montanier throws out new crown virus man-made theory!

    • Last Update: 2020-08-04
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Writer/Zhang Tianxuan (columnist) Nobel Prize-winning, HIV discoverer Montanier throws out the "new crown virus artificial theory", in fact, there is similar speculation about HIV.
    science is not superstitious about authority, and will eventually return to proof and false.
    recently, the issue of the origin of the new crown virus has continued to be controversial. On April 16,
    , a leading French virologist, Professor Luc Montagnier, told French media that they had used mathematical models to study the virus's genes, confirming the previous discovery by Indian scholars of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) with the HIV gene, which led to the conclusion that the new coronavirus was man-made.
    previously, Montanier won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of HIV.
    endorsement of the "professional background" of a Nobel Prize winner and virologist, Montanier's statement has a natural impact, but is it true that what the Nobel laureate says is sure to be reliable? Professor Rao Yi, president of capital medical university and a well-known biologist, also published a strongly worded article on his comments on the personal WeChat public number, Rao Science. "In 2010, Shanghai Jiaotong University proposed the introduction of Montani and wanted the state to support it, "
    notes. "
    in the review, Professor Rao said the consensus among the scientific community was that in recent years, if he had not been doing pseudoscience, he would have slipped to the edge of pseudoscience. It is not the first time in the history of
    science that such a sad situation has occurred (famous scientists have fallen into pseudoscience).
    " Montanier's view is, of course, a hypothesis, that the virus was accidentally leaked by researchers to develop and prevent another disease that seriously endangers people's health and lives, AIDS.
    but so far there is no strong evidence that is a complete speculation.
    scientific problems have never been superstitious about authoritative voices, and although it always starts with doubt, it will eventually return to the path of proof and falseness.
    in fact, Nobel Prize winner Luc Montanier's "viral man-made" argument is not new, on the origin of his own discovery of the HIV virus, there have been such associations and speculation, but ultimately after scientific investigation to crush this association and speculation.
    September 1999, British journalist Edward Hooper published "River Source: Tracing the Origins of HIV and AIDS", suggesting that HIV-1, one of the viruses that causes AIDS today, entered the body in the 1950s from contaminated polio vaccine (OPV) spread ingress in Central Africa.
    this is the so-called polio vaccine-HIV hypothesis, which is also considered to be man-made.
    , some scientists also thought that an accident in which the vaccine was contaminated could have happened.
    because in the 1950s the medical community did use the kidney cells of chimpanzees and monkeys to make polio and adenovirus vaccines, which could be contaminated.
    , Hooper's hypothesis sparked a heated debate in the scientific community, which eventually suggested using experiments to speak.
    to confirm whether the oral polio vaccine (OPV) is contaminated, it will need to open the refrigerator at the Vista Institute in Philadelphia and test it.
    because, since 1992, the world's remaining OPV has been used to vaccinate millions of children in Africa against polio.
    the vaccines were stored in a refrigerator, which was stored in another large refrigerator at the Vista Institute in the United States.
    only the director, Clayton Barker, had the keys to the refrigerator.
    the OPV in the fridge was produced in the 1950s.
    , according to scientific experiments, Barker had to open the refrigerator and send OPV samples to three separate laboratories to test them to see if the vaccines contained any HIV or precursors (monkey immunodeficiency virus SIV).
    to avoid leaks, the three laboratories adopt a double-blind principle when conducting tests, and each laboratory does not know what the other labs are doing in order to ensure the objectivity of the results.
    february 2000, the Vista Institute announced that they had found samples of the vaccine produced that year.
    then, the institute invited three laboratories in the UK, France and Germany to test and analyze the samples.
    results, no traces of chimpanzee cells or HIV were found.
    in a second analysis that followed, the researchers found kidney cells in the sample son-tailed monkeys.
    but short-tailed monkeys are not infected with SIV or HIV.
    the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, in September 2000 and the French Pasteur Institute in Leipzig, Germany, where HIV was first isolated (now the Institute of Montanier, which is called the new coronavirus is man-made), at a meeting of the Royal Society in London, they concluded separately through experiments that "the claim that HIV was inadvertently transmitted by the vaccination of about 1 million people in Africa in the 1950s, which led to today's AIDS disaster in Africa," was unfounded.
    , this conclusion does not shake the idea that HIV was the originator of the oral polio vaccine, Edward Hooper.
    and, to this day, there are still people in the world who believe that HIV is man-made and a genetic weapon used by one race to specifically deal with another race.
    to block the new crown virus "artificial theme", only follow the scientific methods, scientific investigation to prove that the new coronavirus is spread from nature to humans, not artificial creation.
    Source: Science Plus, Science Plus, Science.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.