echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Medical News > Latest Medical News > Public health experts put forward the ethical principle of the distribution of the new crown vaccine

    Public health experts put forward the ethical principle of the distribution of the new crown vaccine

    • Last Update: 2020-12-04
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    With the development of the new crown vaccine at its climax, 19 public health experts recently published a policy report in the journal Science, proposing an ethical framework called the "Fair Priority Model" that promises to address the fair and equitable distribution of vaccines, according to Scientific American.
    Develop this framework, based on three ethical principles of vaccine distribution, including public benefit reduction, priority given to poor or low-life-expectancy countries and avoidance of discrimination in distribution, is designed to mitigate the impact of the hoarding of vaccines on the global fight against the epidemic based on the "national interest first" concept in some countries, and calls on countries to put their sense of responsibility in the face of global public health problems ahead of their own interests in order to achieve early global success in the fight against the epidemic.
    In response, Emanuel, a medical ethicist at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine who led the study, explained that so far, multiple governments have expressed support for fair and equitable distribution of vaccines, and vaccine manufacturers have supported the global distribution of vaccines, while many international organizations, including the New Crown Vaccine Supply Program Alliance (COVAX), have expressed expectations for fair and equitable distribution of vaccines. However, experts have been indefined on how to define "fairness" and "equality" and therefore need to develop an ethical framework to guide the way vaccines are distributed.
    They also raised a number of questions about the multiple distribution options previously proposed by different parties, including WHO's proposal to provide priority care workers, over-65s and people with other conditions, and to take into account differences in ethnic and socio-economic conditions, depending on the size of the population.
    Emanuel points out that while population distribution is in line with the principle of "equality", it ignores the different infection rates in different parts of the world
    , and that it is clearly more reasonable to tilt supplies to seriously affected areas in accordance with international aid practice; On this basis, the "Fair Priority Model" framework proposes new options for the allocation of new crown vaccines. The framework divides vaccine distribution into three phases. In the first phase, distribution is guided by the use of "standard life-reducing years" (the number of years of decline in world life expectancy due to the age of premature death as a result of the outbreak), the second phase is to integrate other indicators to quantify the economic and social consequences of the outbreak and minimize its impact to the extent possible, and the third phase is to prioritize the provision of vaccines to countries with high rates of viral infections while ensuring that countries around the world have access to adequate vaccines to block communal transmission.
    He said that at the ethical level, vaccine distribution should not be affected by nationalism, and that the three core ethical principles in the framework, based on moral tradition and universally recognized values, were unified with the implementation of the plan, which not only inspired the outbreak, but also had broad applicability to other pandemics.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.