echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Food News > Sweetener News > Sampling inspection in Guangxi: alcohol content and sweeteners were found to be unqualified, and the microorganisms of Sansho and chicken feet exceeded the standard

    Sampling inspection in Guangxi: alcohol content and sweeteners were found to be unqualified, and the microorganisms of Sansho and chicken feet exceeded the standard

    • Last Update: 2021-03-19
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    foodmate.
    net/tag_3748.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food related food information" target="_blank">Food Partners Reuters December 7, Guangxifoodmate.
    net/tag_1688.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food and Drug Administration related food information" target="_blank"> Food and Drug Administration released the latest issue offoodmate.
    net/tag_1647.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food safety related food information" target="_blank"> food safety foodmate.
    net/tag_225.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sampling related food information" target="_blank">sampling information, informing the 29 batches of substandard food, includingfoodmate.
    net/tag_4016.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol-related food information" target="_blank"> wine unqualified 23 batches, mostly becausefoodmate.
    net/tag_970.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol related food information" target="_blank"> alcohol ,foodmate.
    net/tag_1848.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sweetener-related food information" target="_blank"> sweet The flavour was unqualified, and there were 6 batches of Sansho andfoodmate.
    net/tag_486.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Chicken feet related food information" target="_blank"> chicken feet with excessivefoodmate.
    net/tag_1901.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Microbiological related food information" target="_blank"> microbial contamination.

    13 batches of alcohol were found to be substandard
     
    Sampling information showed that there were 23 batches of unqualified alcoholic beverages, of which 13 batches were found to be substandard in alcohol, including: Zhongtian Winery·Mulongzhu dry red wine produced by Guangxi Zhongtian Lingyu Liquor Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Guilin Yaotan old wine produced by Darongjiang Distillery in Xing'an County; pure rice wine produced by Junzheng Food Factory in Nanning; Laosanhua wine produced by Songquan Distillery in Lingchuan County, Guilin; Liuxi rice wine produced by Chuangzhi Food Factory in Hengxian County, Guangxi ; Gecko male test wine produced by Guilin Ronghua Wine Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Sanhua wine produced by Guilin Xicheng Fujiang Wine Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Momi Wine (rice rice wine) produced by Momi Winery in Donglan County, Guangxi; Liushun Winery in Guilin Osmanthus King Liquor [8 years old]; Old Sanhua alcohol produced by Songquan Distillery in Lingchuan County; Lishan alcohol (liquor) produced by Guilin Hongyan Distillery; Zuiyitang Liquor produced by Guilin Zuiyitang Liquor Co.
    , Ltd.
    Yitang Liquor; Sanhua Liquor produced by Guilin Linglong Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.

     
      Alcohol is also called alcohol, which refers to the number of milliliters of ethanol (alcohol) in 100 milliliters of wine at 20°C.
    Alcohol is an important physical and chemical index of alcoholic products.
    Substandard content mainly affects the quality of the product.
    Unqualified alcohol may be caused by the lack of strict production process control or low production process level of individual companies, which cannot effectively control the alcohol level; it may also be caused by individual companies deliberately increasing the alcohol level in order to reduce costs in order to increase sales prices and deceive consumers ; It is also not ruled out that the manufacturer's inspection equipment is not accurately measured and the inspection results are biased.
     
      10 batches of alcoholic beverages were detected as unqualified sweeteners
     
      In addition, 10 batches of alcoholic beverages were found to be unqualified for sweeteners, of which 9 batches of products were detected with sucralose and 1 batch was detected with cyclamate.
    They are: Tianlongquan liquor produced by Guangxi Tianlongquan Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Bamaquan produced by Guangxi Bama Changshou Old Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of 28% vol Dan produced by Guangxi Danquan Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    Quandan rice wine; 2 batches of Yaojia Sanhua wine produced by Guilin Xicheng Fujiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Treasure Sanhua Liquor produced by Guilin Yijiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Lijiangdong Tibetan rice wine produced by Guilin Lijiang Lijiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Fengshan rice wine produced by Guangxi Panyanghe Industrial Co.
    , Ltd.
     
      Sucralose and sodium cyclamate are food additives that can increase the sweetness of products.
    According to the provisions of national food safety standards and related product standards, it is not allowed to use additives beyond the scope or limit.
    The reason may be that the company uses over-range or over-limit sweeteners in order to increase the sweetness of the products, or does not accurately measure the sweeteners.
     
      Six batches of Sansho chicken feet were detected with excessive microbial contamination
     
      In addition to the above-mentioned unqualified wines, 6 batches of Sansho chicken feet were found to be contaminated by microorganisms (total number of colonies, coliforms) exceeding the standard.
    They are: Wild Sansho chicken feet produced by Jingxi Hongen Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Sansho chicken feet produced by Wuming County Jiaxing Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Sansho pepper produced by Guangxi Jingxi County Pengbin Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    Chicken feet, 1 batch of wild sansho chicken feet.
     
      The total number of colonies, coliforms, etc.
    are all microbial indicators.
    Excessive microbiological indicators indicate that its sanitation status does not meet the basic sanitation requirements, which may lead to the destruction of food nutrients, accelerated spoilage, and loss of edible value.
     
      The main reasons for disqualification are: the sanitary environmental conditions for raw material production, storage, and transportation are not strictly controlled; production is not strictly carried out in accordance with the requirements of the production process conditions, the processing sanitation environment is poor, the production tools are not cleaned thoroughly, the equipment is not cleaned and disinfected properly, and the personnel are hygienic.
    Management is not in place; the storage conditions of products in production, circulation and sales are not up to standard.
     
      Consumers eating foods with excessive microorganisms are prone to symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea, causing intestinal diseases such as dysentery, and endangering human health and safety.
     
      The Guangxi Food and Drug Administration stated that the relevant food and drug regulatory authorities of all cities and counties (cities, districts) have dealt with the unqualified food found in the above-mentioned random inspections in accordance with the law.

          Related report: foodmate.
    net/2017/12/451824.
    html" target="_blank">Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Supervision Sampling Information Announcement (2017 Issue 45, Issue 115)
     
      This article is edited by the Food Information Center of FoodPartner.
    com for the reference of netizens.
    Welcome to reprint.
    Please indicate the source for reprinting! If you have any questions, please contact news@foodmate.
    net.

      foodmate.
    net/tag_3748.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food related food information" target="_blank">Food Partners Reuters December 7, Guangxifoodmate.
    net/tag_1688.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food and Drug Administration related food information" target="_blank"> Food and Drug Administration released the latest issue offoodmate.
    net/tag_1647.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food safety related food information" target="_blank"> food safety foodmate.
    net/tag_225.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sampling related food information" target="_blank">sampling information, informing the 29 batches of substandard food, includingfoodmate.
    net/tag_4016.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol-related food information" target="_blank"> wine unqualified 23 batches, mostly becausefoodmate.
    net/tag_970.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol related food information" target="_blank"> alcohol ,foodmate.
    net/tag_1848.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sweetener-related food information" target="_blank"> sweet The flavour was unqualified, and there were 6 batches of Sansho andfoodmate.
    net/tag_486.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Chicken feet related food information" target="_blank"> chicken feet with excessivefoodmate.
    net/tag_1901.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Microbiological related food information" target="_blank"> microbial contamination.

      13 batches of alcohol were found to be substandard
     
      Sampling information showed that there were 23 batches of unqualified alcoholic beverages, of which 13 batches were found to be substandard in alcohol, including: Zhongtian Winery·Mulongzhu dry red wine produced by Guangxi Zhongtian Lingyu Liquor Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Guilin Yaotan old wine produced by Darongjiang Distillery in Xing'an County; pure rice wine produced by Junzheng Food Factory in Nanning; Laosanhua wine produced by Songquan Distillery in Lingchuan County, Guilin; Liuxi rice wine produced by Chuangzhi Food Factory in Hengxian County, Guangxi ; Gecko male test wine produced by Guilin Ronghua Wine Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Sanhua wine produced by Guilin Xicheng Fujiang Wine Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Momi Wine (rice rice wine) produced by Momi Winery in Donglan County, Guangxi; Liushun Winery in Guilin Osmanthus King Liquor [8 years old]; Old Sanhua alcohol produced by Songquan Distillery in Lingchuan County; Lishan alcohol (liquor) produced by Guilin Hongyan Distillery; Zuiyitang Liquor produced by Guilin Zuiyitang Liquor Co.
    , Ltd.
    Yitang Liquor; Sanhua Liquor produced by Guilin Linglong Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.

     
      Alcohol is also called alcohol, which refers to the number of milliliters of ethanol (alcohol) in 100 milliliters of wine at 20°C.
    Alcohol is an important physical and chemical index of alcoholic products.
    Substandard content mainly affects the quality of the product.
    Unqualified alcohol may be caused by the lack of strict production process control or low production process level of individual companies, which cannot effectively control the alcohol level; it may also be caused by individual companies deliberately increasing the alcohol level in order to reduce costs in order to increase sales prices and deceive consumers ; It is also not ruled out that the manufacturer's inspection equipment is not accurately measured and the inspection results are biased.
     
      10 batches of alcoholic beverages were detected as unqualified sweeteners
     
      In addition, 10 batches of alcoholic beverages were found to be unqualified for sweeteners, of which 9 batches of products were detected with sucralose and 1 batch was detected with cyclamate.
    They are: Tianlongquan liquor produced by Guangxi Tianlongquan Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Bamaquan produced by Guangxi Bama Changshou Old Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of 28% vol Dan produced by Guangxi Danquan Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    Quandan rice wine; 2 batches of Yaojia Sanhua wine produced by Guilin Xicheng Fujiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Treasure Sanhua Liquor produced by Guilin Yijiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Lijiangdong Tibetan rice wine produced by Guilin Lijiang Lijiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Fengshan rice wine produced by Guangxi Panyanghe Industrial Co.
    , Ltd.
     
      Sucralose and sodium cyclamate are food additives that can increase the sweetness of products.
    According to the provisions of national food safety standards and related product standards, it is not allowed to use additives beyond the scope or limit.
    The reason may be that the company uses over-range or over-limit sweeteners in order to increase the sweetness of the products, or does not accurately measure the sweeteners.
     
      Six batches of Sansho chicken feet were detected with excessive microbial contamination
     
      In addition to the above-mentioned unqualified wines, 6 batches of Sansho chicken feet were found to be contaminated by microorganisms (total number of colonies, coliforms) exceeding the standard.
    They are: Wild Sansho chicken feet produced by Jingxi Hongen Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Sansho chicken feet produced by Wuming County Jiaxing Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Sansho pepper produced by Guangxi Jingxi County Pengbin Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    Chicken feet, 1 batch of wild sansho chicken feet.
     
      The total number of colonies, coliforms, etc.
    are all microbial indicators.
    Excessive microbiological indicators indicate that its sanitation status does not meet the basic sanitation requirements, which may lead to the destruction of food nutrients, accelerated spoilage, and loss of edible value.
     
      The main reasons for disqualification are: the sanitary environmental conditions for raw material production, storage, and transportation are not strictly controlled; production is not strictly carried out in accordance with the requirements of the production process conditions, the processing sanitation environment is poor, the production tools are not cleaned thoroughly, the equipment is not cleaned and disinfected properly, and the personnel are hygienic.
    Management is not in place; the storage conditions of products in production, circulation and sales are not up to standard.
     
      Consumers eating foods with excessive microorganisms are prone to symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea, causing intestinal diseases such as dysentery, and endangering human health and safety.
     
      The Guangxi Food and Drug Administration stated that the relevant food and drug regulatory authorities of all cities and counties (cities, districts) have dealt with the unqualified food found in the above-mentioned random inspections in accordance with the law.

          Related report: foodmate.
    net/2017/12/451824.
    html" target="_blank">Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Supervision Sampling Information Announcement (2017 Issue 45, Issue 115)
     
      This article is edited by the Food Information Center of FoodPartner.
    com for the reference of netizens.
    Welcome to reprint.
    Please indicate the source for reprinting! If you have any questions, please contact news@foodmate.
    net.

      foodmate.
    net/tag_3748.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food related food information" target="_blank">Food Partners Reuters December 7, Guangxifoodmate.
    net/tag_1688.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food and Drug Administration related food information" target="_blank"> Food and Drug Administration released the latest issue offoodmate.
    net/tag_1647.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food safety related food information" target="_blank"> food safety foodmate.
    net/tag_225.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sampling related food information" target="_blank">sampling information, informing the 29 batches of substandard food, includingfoodmate.
    net/tag_4016.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol-related food information" target="_blank"> wine unqualified 23 batches, mostly becausefoodmate.
    net/tag_970.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol related food information" target="_blank"> alcohol ,foodmate.
    net/tag_1848.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sweetener-related food information" target="_blank"> sweet The flavour was unqualified, and there were 6 batches of Sansho andfoodmate.
    net/tag_486.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Chicken feet related food information" target="_blank"> chicken feet with excessivefoodmate.
    net/tag_1901.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Microbiological related food information" target="_blank"> microbial contamination.
    foodmate.
    net/tag_3748.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food related food information" target="_blank">Food Partner Network News foodmate.
    net/tag_3748.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food related food information" target="_blank">Food, foodmate.
    net/tag_1688.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food and Drug Administration related food information" target="_blank">Food and Drug Administration, foodmate.
    net/tag_1647.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Food safety related food information" target="_blank">Food Safety foodmate.
    net/tag_225.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sampling related food information" target="_blank">Sampling Inspection of foodmate.
    net/tag_4016.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol-related food information" target="_blank">Alcohol, foodmate.
    net/tag_970.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Alcohol related food information" target="_blank">Alcohol, foodmate.
    net/tag_1848.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Sweetener-related food information" target="_blank">Sweetener, foodmate.
    net/tag_486.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Chicken feet related food information" target="_blank">Chicken Feet foodmate.
    net/tag_1901.
    html" class="zdbq" title="Microbiological related food information" target="_blank">Microorganisms

      13 batches of alcohol were found to be substandard
      13 batches of alcohol were found to be substandard
     
      Sampling information showed that there were 23 batches of unqualified alcoholic beverages, of which 13 batches were found to be substandard in alcohol, including: Zhongtian Winery·Mulongzhu dry red wine produced by Guangxi Zhongtian Lingyu Liquor Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Guilin Yaotan old wine produced by Darongjiang Distillery in Xing'an County; pure rice wine produced by Junzheng Food Factory in Nanning; Laosanhua wine produced by Songquan Distillery in Lingchuan County, Guilin; Liuxi rice wine produced by Chuangzhi Food Factory in Hengxian County, Guangxi ; Gecko male test wine produced by Guilin Ronghua Wine Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Sanhua wine produced by Guilin Xicheng Fujiang Wine Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Momi Wine (rice rice wine) produced by Momi Winery in Donglan County, Guangxi; Liushun Winery in Guilin Osmanthus King Liquor [8 years old]; Old Sanhua alcohol produced by Songquan Distillery in Lingchuan County; Lishan alcohol (liquor) produced by Guilin Hongyan Distillery; Zuiyitang Liquor produced by Guilin Zuiyitang Liquor Co.
    , Ltd.
    Yitang Liquor; Sanhua Liquor produced by Guilin Linglong Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
     
      Alcohol is also called alcohol, which refers to the number of milliliters of ethanol (alcohol) in 100 milliliters of wine at 20°C.
    Alcohol is an important physical and chemical index of alcoholic products.
    Substandard content mainly affects the quality of the product.
    Unqualified alcohol may be caused by the lack of strict production process control or low production process level of individual companies, which cannot effectively control the alcohol level; it may also be caused by individual companies deliberately increasing the alcohol level in order to reduce costs in order to increase sales prices and deceive consumers ; It is also not ruled out that the manufacturer's inspection equipment is not accurately measured and the inspection results are biased.
     
      10 batches of alcoholic beverages were detected as unqualified sweeteners
    10 batches of alcoholic beverages were detected as unqualified sweeteners
     
      In addition, 10 batches of alcoholic beverages were found to be unqualified for sweeteners, of which 9 batches of products were detected with sucralose and 1 batch was detected with cyclamate.
    They are: Tianlongquan liquor produced by Guangxi Tianlongquan Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Bamaquan produced by Guangxi Bama Changshou Old Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of 28% vol Dan produced by Guangxi Danquan Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    Quandan rice wine; 2 batches of Yaojia Sanhua wine produced by Guilin Xicheng Fujiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Treasure Sanhua Liquor produced by Guilin Yijiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Lijiangdong Tibetan rice wine produced by Guilin Lijiang Lijiang Liquor Industry Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; Fengshan rice wine produced by Guangxi Panyanghe Industrial Co.
    , Ltd.
     
      Sucralose and sodium cyclamate are food additives that can increase the sweetness of products.
    According to the provisions of national food safety standards and related product standards, it is not allowed to use additives beyond the scope or limit.
    The reason may be that the company uses over-range or over-limit sweeteners in order to increase the sweetness of the products, or does not accurately measure the sweeteners.
     
      Six batches of Sansho chicken feet were detected with excessive microbial contamination
     Six batches of Sansho chicken feet were detected with excessive microbial contamination
     
      In addition to the above-mentioned unqualified wines, 6 batches of Sansho chicken feet were found to be contaminated by microorganisms (total number of colonies, coliforms) exceeding the standard.
    They are: Wild Sansho chicken feet produced by Jingxi Hongen Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Sansho chicken feet produced by Wuming County Jiaxing Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    ; 2 batches of Sansho pepper produced by Guangxi Jingxi County Pengbin Food Co.
    , Ltd.
    Chicken feet, 1 batch of wild sansho chicken feet.
     
      The total number of colonies, coliforms, etc.
    are all microbial indicators.
    Excessive microbiological indicators indicate that its sanitation status does not meet the basic sanitation requirements, which may lead to the destruction of food nutrients, accelerated spoilage, and loss of edible value.
     
      The main reasons for disqualification are: the sanitary environmental conditions for raw material production, storage, and transportation are not strictly controlled; production is not strictly carried out in accordance with the requirements of the production process conditions, the processing sanitation environment is poor, the production tools are not cleaned thoroughly, the equipment is not cleaned and disinfected properly, and the personnel are hygienic.
    Management is not in place; the storage conditions of products in production, circulation and sales are not up to standard.
     
      Consumers eating foods with excessive microorganisms are prone to symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea, causing intestinal diseases such as dysentery, and endangering human health and safety.
     
      The Guangxi Food and Drug Administration stated that the relevant food and drug regulatory authorities of all cities and counties (cities, districts) have dealt with the unqualified food found in the above-mentioned random inspections in accordance with the law.

          Related report: foodmate.
    net/2017/12/451824.
    html" target="_blank">Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Supervision Sampling Information Announcement (2017 Issue 45, Issue 115)
     

    foodmate.
    net/2017/12/451824.
    html" target="_blank">Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Supervision Sampling Information Announcement (2017 Issue 45, Issue 115)
      This article is edited by the Food Information Center of FoodPartner.
    com for the reference of netizens.
    Welcome to reprint.
    Please indicate the source for reprinting! If you have any questions, please contact news@foodmate.
    net.

      This article is edited by the Food Information Center of FoodPartner.
    com for the reference of netizens.
    Welcome to reprint.
    Please indicate the source for reprinting! If you have any questions, please contact news@foodmate.
    net.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.