See through the gimmicks of "healthy food"

everyone wants to eat "healthy food", many businesses will be as you want to provide a variety of "healthy food." In the bombardment of nutrients, scientific terminology and new research, novel "healthy foods" always make a lot of money. However, when we look at the "seemingly reasonable" presentations with a professional eye, we find that most of them are gimmicks - or just the right nonsense. Here are the most common types of nonsense: I, the body necessary substances the normal operation of the human body requires a lot of substances, but "human body necessary" and "need to supplement" are two different things. In one case, the substances the human body needs need to be produced by the body itself to be useful, and it is useless to eat them, such as collagen and various enzymes (i.e., "enzymes"). In another case, as long as you can eat and drink normally, there will be no shortage, such as phosphorus, chlorine, sodium, fat, carbohydrates and so on. Showing how "healthy" a food is a complete steal.2nd,
XX
nutrients the human body needs to ingest a variety of nutrients from food, each with its own appropriate needs. In addition to infants, people eat a variety of food every day, the sum of all kinds of food to form the nutritional composition of intake. A good food that efficiently provides one or more nutrients (such as protein, fiber, vitamins, etc.) that are susceptible to deficiency, while less nutrients (such as fat and sugar) are included that need to be restricted. "How many nutrients" is a worthless indicator - as for the advertisement said "contains
XX
vitamins,
XX
minerals and other nutrients required by the human body", casually put a weed to test, can also detect similar results.3, the content is
XX
times higher than a certain food typical examples, such as "rose salt contains dozens of times more iron than ordinary salt" and "Spirulina protein content is more than twenty times that of milk". The former is because ordinary salts contain almost no iron, rose salt as long as a little, is many times. The latter, on the other hand, compares the dry weight of spirulina to more than 80 percent of milk that is water. In fact, no matter how many times the iron in rose salt is ordinary salt, can only eat a few grams of salt every day, of which iron can be completely ignored. Although the protein content of spirulina is high, but eat a few grams a day is already expensive, and milk to drink hundreds of grams is not a problem, so milk is a good source of protein and spirulina is not. It doesn't make sense to talk about the nutritional content of food, not taking into account the normal amount of food and the proportion of the amount contained in the daily demand.Ivy,
XX
University research found that any food or food ingredients of the health effects, after many years, a large number of, all angles, multi-agency research, in order to form a consensus to be recognized. The
XX
university found that "often only preliminary studies in specific conditions and systems are of scientific value but far from sufficient to reach "conclusions". And a lot of advertising is to distort and exaggerate the results of the study to fool the public.there's a lot of gimmicks about "healthy food" in the market. For consumers who do not have the ability to judge professionally, when they see a "magically unmoved" food, you may wish to wash a cold-water face, and then see if there is an authority or independent science introduction - if not, then look after their wallets.