echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Food News > Food Articles > Some animals have cognitive biases similar to those of humans

    Some animals have cognitive biases similar to those of humans

    • Last Update: 2021-03-11
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    to force yourself to watch a movie you don't want to see at all, this irrational decision is not unique to humans. U.S. researchers have recently found that some animals also adhere to significant adverse practices due to similar cognitive biases.
    cognition and psychological research often uses the term sunk cost, which refers to past inputs, unciveable costs, which should not affect current or future choices, but humans tend to fall into the trap of sinking cost fallacy. A new study from the University of Minnesota in the United States shows that humans, mice and rats have similar cognitive biases in the cost of sinking, a result that could help study the evolution of decision-making thinking.In a paper published in the American journal
    , the
    researchers said they chose mice and rats as subjects and set up a foraging environment where different foods were available at different "stalls" but waited until they were available, and the total time allowed to forage was limited. After the lab rats arrive at a stall, they first decide whether to wait here and then decide whether to wait or go to the next stall after entering the waiting area, with a ringing prompt for how long to wait.
    mice had different preferences for different foods, rational decision-making should be to give up immediately if it wasn't for the food they liked and the waiting time was longer. But the reality is that no matter what the food is, once the decision is made to wait, the mice tend to wait, and the longer they have waited, the harder it is to give up.
    researchers set up similar situations for human volunteers, simply swapping food for entertainment videos and using download progress tips to wait, only to find that humans reacted in a similar way to laboratory mice.
    unexpected finding of the study was that the time spent considering whether to start waiting, whether or not to start, was not included in the cost of sinking. Whether to start waiting and whether to wait is two different decisions, the researchers said, may be the responsibility of two groups of unrelated neural circuits.
    why are people and animals so sensitive to the cost of sinking? The researchers believe this may be a compromise caused by insufficient information. "In the natural environment it is sometimes difficult to predict how much to spend on one thing, and a trade-off between the cost of obtaining relevant information and the cost of making a decision may be useful in most cases by reference to the costs that have already occurred." (Source: Xinhua News Agency)
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.