The paper with the worst impact in recent years was finally withdrawn after several journal editors resigned and protested, but the consequences may be difficult to recover

June 24, 2021, Harald Walach, Rainer J.
Klement, Wouter Aukema trio Vaccines journal published a report entitled: at The Safety COVID-of-19 Vaccinations Should Rethink, We at The Policy (new crown vaccine safety - we Should reconsider the policy) thesis
.

The paper used data from the Dutch Vaccine Adverse Reaction Registry and came to a shocking conclusion: every time the new crown vaccine successfully prevented 3 deaths, it would cause 2 deaths
.

Once the paper went online, it immediately caused an uproar
.

However, although the paper has only been online for a few days, the negative impact it caused is hard to recover, and it can be called the most influential research paper in recent years
.

In just a few days, the paper has attracted hundreds of thousands of people to read
.

The three authors of this paper, Harald Walach, are a clinical psychologist and a historian of science who are engaged in complementary medicine research at Poznan Medical University in Poland, and Rainer Klement, a physicist, is based in Leopoldi, Germany.
The Vaccine Radiation Oncology Department is engaged in research on customized diets in cancer treatment; Wouter Aukema is an independent data scientist in the Netherlands
.

They first estimated the preventive effect of the new crown vaccine on patient deaths through the analysis of Israeli vaccination data.
For every 16,000 people vaccinated, one new crown patient can be prevented from dying
.

Then, they used data from the Dutch Vaccine Adverse Reaction Registry to try to estimate the number of deaths caused by the side effects of the new crown vaccine
.

However, this registration data in the Netherlands belongs to a passive surveillance system, in which anyone can submit a report of adverse events after vaccination, regardless of the cause
.

Therefore, after the paper went online, the person in charge of the Dutch Vaccine Adverse Reaction Registry sent an email to the journal editorial office the next day to point out the paper’s misuse of data and serious inaccurate conclusions, and requested the journal to withdraw the manuscript

However, the three reviewers of this paper did not find and point out such fatal problems in the paper.

In addition, a few days after the publication of the Vaccines paper, the three authors published an article titled: Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial ( Experimental evaluation of carbon dioxide content in the air inhaled by healthy children with or without masks: a randomized clinical trial)

The paper also came to a shocking conclusion: children wearing masks will lead to increased carbon dioxide inhalation, leading to hypercapnia, and recommended that children should not be forced to wear masks

This paper has been viewed by more than 500,000 people, more than 23,000 tweets have been reposted, and dozens of news media have reported

Original source:

Harald Walach, et al.