The patient raged behind the hospital: there were medicines on the catalogue and the hospital was out of stock

The purpose of fee control should not be to get stuck with normal medication.
as a middle-age person, I can understand the patient's state of mind; as a medic, I can understand the doctor's situation; as a common man, I can't understand the outcome.
a lung transplant patient who contracted the infection after surgery and was hospitalized for more than a dozen days, heeded a doctor's recommendation to spend $520,000 on medication at his own expense, according to a report by The Associated Press.
found that the drugs had been on the jiangsu province's health insurance directory, the patient's son asked the hospital for a reasonable explanation, and then the hospital changed the medication plan, during which the patient's condition deteriorated and died.
the patient's son for $440,000, which is the proportion of reimbursement for the purchase of the drug at his own expense.
's not a farmer's story about snakes, but it's certainly not going to be the last such incident.
the root cause of the incident has not been removed and may even get worse.
are the expectations of ordinary people to be insured? When I am ill, the cost of treatment and medical expenses can be reimbursed in a certain proportion.
it's true to save me money, it doesn't make sense to mention anything else.
must be something I can enjoy and be able to land.
is the expectation that the state will set up a list of medicare medications? Control health-care fund spending, compare drug effectiveness with prices, and choose drugs with relatively high ratios.
a word, in order to save money.
Whether the former people can save money can be realized depends on hospital doctors, pharmaceutical companies, medical insurance, commercial insurance, a number of factors to participate in their own just bear, the latter health insurance is the ability to make independent decisions, through DRG, DIP, and drug proportion and so on to assess.
looks beautiful, but it ignores a point.
man is not a machine and cannot be valued by a precise calculation.
can not be standardized, and the drug and doctor's salary linked, this in exchange for who, also can not guarantee that the disease needs to move health insurance money.
I save people is work, this money is not spent on me, why withhold my money? The patient is more depressed, my medicine is clearly in the health insurance directory, why do I have to go outside to buy? After all, it is not possible for patients to have a thorough understanding of the health care system.
the same medicine, she buys health insurance, I pay for it all? There's no reason? Do you remember Siddle, famous for two more than one grain? Many people analyze this may be used to treat pulmonary hypertension, not to strengthen your leverage.
this matter is not explained clearly, patients may feel unfair, my husband is also rigid demand ah, why all at their own expense? Why do you give her a female patient to get Medicare reimbursement for this medicine? It can be seen that there is still room for improvement in the declaration of policy.
pharmacists or others may not have worked as expected.
name of the medicare catalog is indeed there, but people have to correspond to the disease to be reimbursed.
, at the very least, it can be stated that some cases are not related to the doctor.
is now related to the doctor, if the doctor all according to the health insurance, health insurance and finally refused to pay, the money seems to have to be borne by the general department.
's that called? Sweat and tears are not a long-term solution at all.
business insurance, a lot of people buy, I also bought accident insurance.
, after all, often write things, disease and accident which come first can not say well.
Yesterday, I also received a call from the insurance manager, because it is busy, and they may be in order to show the quality of business, there will be a long lay-up ahead, I wonder this, you are not writing a word, with the 2019 new crown outbreak to say the current status of the new crown vaccine? So I implored the other side, "time is limited, I am not convenient to record what you said, can you send a model contract to see?" "The result is what the other side said, "The contract is too professional, you do not understand, or listen to me."
"I'm surprised, I'm also the one who has universal compulsory education."
also done so much Chinese reading understanding, even Lu Xun "two eucalyptus trees" can be introduced to the profound meaning, to your insurance contract here is not good to make? "If you don't think the customer understands, shouldn't the contract be more human?" Did you write badly or did you deliberately use these things to raise the claim threshold? "The phone's hanging up.
unique, family members have medical professionals, insurance personnel in the known professional background, or a mouthful of "which diseases, you do not understand."
time, I think they learned to be aggressive.
in the sale of insurance does not need too high academic requirements, but also can tell others do not understand anything.
's this? "He's clearly so ordinary, but he's so confident."
I write these two paragraphs for? Of course, it's not a simple count, it's a fact: "Any money invested is simple, it's hard to use."
" but difficult to return to, for the application of drugs, patients do not have the ability to understand, policy makers should have this ability.
other words, to do this job must also have this ability ah! In the present situation, the policy neglects the personalized space, it also has the limitation.
anyone is to give priority to the protection of their own interests under the premise of doing things, doctors also have to protect their own salaries, doomed to have a large number of contradictions.
single case may trigger heated debate and ignite emotions, but this is based on the contradiction between doctors and patients.
failure to improve could affect the quality of care and ultimately create greater risks.