The phenomenon of takeaway loss occurs frequently on campus, how to protect the consumer rights of the student group

Recently, South China Normal University published an article stating that about 40% of teachers and students have missed takeaways, and the existing preventive measures are not effective.
Questionnaire data shows that in the three campuses of South China Normal University, about 36.
9% of people have lost food delivery.
The person in charge of a take-out site told reporters that an average of 20 take-outs were lost every day.
Although the takeaway amount is not high, many students interviewed said that it is difficult to accept the problem of lost meals, and more than 90% of the students surveyed hope that the problem can be solved.

According to the Security Office of the University Town Campus of South China Normal University, the loss of the takeaway does not rule out the possibility of students taking it by mistake.
Some takeaways were not taken overnight; the person in charge of the takeaway station near the school reminded that the loss of the takeaway might be wrong.
These analyses have some truth.
As long as the students carefully identify the order information when picking up the food, or the delivery rider reduces the negligence of work, the loss of the food caused by these reasons can be basically controlled.

However, some students lost their takeaways many times, and after spotting observations, they really caught the students who stole the takeaways.

Compared with the loss of takeaways caused by objective reasons, the behavior of students stealing takeaways is much worse in nature, because the theft not only harms the interests of takeaway students, but also induces disputes within the takeaway system.
Takeaway platforms, merchants, and riders will all be affected by this.

Most people order takeout, and the rider will deliver it in person.

There is basically no situation where the takeout is lost or stolen for no reason.
However, on campus, the riders are from outside the society.

Due to the time interval between the delivery of takeout and the receipt by students, and the lack of management for taking meals, taking takeaways depends on students looking for them one by one.

The probability of picking up wrong in a hurry will increase, and chaos in order will give people who steal the food a good opportunity.
, Making it easier to fish in troubled waters.

Take the survey of South China Normal University as an example.

Although the Nanhai campus of the school is in the same school area, the probability of losing takeout is far lower than the overall level of the school, because the distance from the dormitory to the school gate is short, and riders and students hand in takeout.
The frequency is higher.

Under the existing management order of the school, taking meals solves the problem of time connection between riders and students to a certain extent, which not only improves the delivery efficiency of riders, but also makes the time for students to collect takeaways relatively flexible.
However, it is necessary to strengthen the strict management of taking meals to reduce the phenomenon of disorderly taking meals.
In this regard, some people propose to set up takeaway cabinets like express cabinets, which are safe and hygienic; some advocate the establishment of a third-party custody and maintenance organization, and provide work-study subsidies to attract school students to participate in management.
These suggestions have been implemented in some universities in the south.
Universities in other regions may wish to learn from their own conditions and learn from useful experience to solve problems in accordance with local conditions.

Regarding the loss of takeaways, some riders think that if students do not complain, there is no need for them to investigate deeply.

As long as they send a few more orders, they can make up for the related losses.
However, if the loss phenomenon cannot be fundamentally resolved, and there is even a tendency to intensify, the future compensation costs will be unbearable for the rider.

Save the trouble of running errands out of school, and you can also enjoy the food in a different taste, which is the main reason why students prefer to take out.

In take-out trading activities, objective campus management methods have caused many restrictions on take-out delivery, but it is the responsibility of merchants, platforms, and service providers such as riders to ensure that orders are delivered in a timely, accurate, and safe manner.
The frequent loss of takeaways will inevitably bring distress to students and greatly reduce their consumption experience.

College students’ handling of takeaway food should take into account the law and society

College students’ handling of takeaway food should take into account the law and society

Recently, Zhou Mou, a graduate of Nanjing First University, was arrested by the police for continuing to steal takeaways in a certain district in Nanjing.

According to him, he can't remember the number of times he stole food.
It is understood that Zhou was in a poor family.
For his studies, all three brothers and sisters in the family dropped out to study for him alone.
Currently, he is reviewing and preparing for postgraduate entrance examinations, but he was sent to the classroom for the sake of gaining a little advantage.

After the initial news came out, the fact that the family was poor and the three brothers and sisters dropped out of school for him to go to college stimulated people's compassion.

The overwhelming sympathy of public opinion, even a little sensational, immediately connected him with a classic image: Jean Valjean who stole bread.
I did not repost those sensational articles because I think this should not be the case.

I have always believed that even if college students cannot find a formal job, tutoring primary and secondary school homework, tens of yuan per hour, can be said to be a job with a good hourly salary.
Therefore, as long as college students work harder and earn money for their own studies, it will not be a problem, and they will not be too poor to steal food.
The details disclosed later showed that he was still renting a house in Nanjing and was not in a state of extreme poverty.
Therefore, stealing food is greedy for petty gains, lack of legal knowledge, thinking that evil petty can be done.

There are clear victims for his actions.
The first is the damage to the consumer, but if the consumer does not admit that he is unlucky, he will complain to the takeaway brother.
He has stolen the takeout many times.
There may be more than one takeaway brother involved.
If they are complained, they will compensate the consumer.
Losses may also be punished by the platform.
If you lose food for many times, you may even be fired.
For a family, it is also a disaster.
It was precisely because he had been stolen many times that the victim would call the police, and the police would invest in investigation and eventually caught him.

Therefore, as far as the facts are concerned, he is not a Jean Valjean, but just a confused young man who is greedy for cheap and has bad conduct.
He harmed others and eventually harmed himself and was detained under criminal law.
It was criminal detention that caused controversy.

What needs to be explained is that criminal detention itself is not a punishment, but the beginning of entering a criminal case.
Generally speaking, after the criminal detention period expires, they will not be released, and they may be arrested until the court verdict and then serve their sentence.
According to the provisions of Article 264 of the Criminal Law, the crime of theft refers to the theft of a large amount of public and private property for the purpose of illegal possession or multiple thefts, theft in the house, theft with a lethal weapon, or pickpocketing of public and private property.

From the perspective of the amount of property, according to the 2013 "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Theft", theft of public and private property worth 1,000 to 3,000 yuan or more can be determined as a "large amount".

According to reports, he can't remember the number of times he stole, and there may be more than 1,000 yuan in total.
More importantly, his behavior is in line with the "multiple times" in the crime of theft.
Therefore, the police's criminal detention, from a procedural point of view, is not a big problem.
On the other hand, Zhou's behavior falls into the scope of the crime of theft regardless of the amount or frequency, which also reflects his indifference in legal consciousness.
This is probably not just a problem of him alone, but a certain degree among college students.
Universality.

However, then again, although Zhou is greedy, he is only for appetite.
Although Zhou has no problem with food and clothing, he has to think twice if he wants to eat well.
Takeaway is not the delicacies of the mountains and the sea, nor the Maotai Wuliangye, so there is no "gluttonous greed".
Society is developing and productivity is improving.
The bread of the year may now be equivalent to a chicken leg and a takeaway meal.
From this perspective, the simple intuition of public opinion, from the takeaway to the bread in the tragic world, is not too problematic.
There is no such thing as an unprincipled "you are poor, you are justified.
" Taking into account the national conditions of Chinese society, this sympathy is due to a reason, it is inevitable, and it is also commendable.

，，，、。，，，，、。《》“，”，。。，，，，、，，。

： ,

：，！

xianjichina.
com">，