The reform of the "Three Reviews" makes innovation more dynamic

fair, reasonable and scientific evaluation system is the basis for stimulating the innovation vitality of scientific researchers and comprehensively enhancing the competitiveness of science and technology. How to build a more perfect evaluation mechanism, so that the "return of the spirit of science", the formation of a good atmosphere for scientific research, so that researchers feel at ease to engage in innovative work, has always been the scientific and technological management departments and even the whole scientific and technological community.
this reason, the Opinions on Deepening Project Review, Talent Evaluation and Institutional Evaluation Reform issued by
and
in 2018 (hereinafter referred to as the Opinions) have attracted wide attention since their introduction. The Opinions clearly call for the comprehensive deepening of the reform of the "Three Reviews" to create a scientific research environment that focuses on research, pursues excellence and is clean and clean, and maximizes the enthusiasm and creativity of scientific researchers.
two years since the implementation of the Opinions, the autonomy of scientific research has been expanding, the performance evaluation system has become more scientific, and the approval of statements has been further simplified. A series of practical and hard-nosed measures to deepen the reform of the scientific and technological system are the "persistent diseases" that have plagued the scientific and technological community for many years, which have really stimulated the vitality of innovation.
is the key to scientific and technological innovation. Since the implementation of the Opinions, the tendency of "only papers, only job title, only academic qualifications, only awards, only hats" has been removed, and the scientific establishment of talent evaluation indicators has become a "wind indicator". Relevant policies have been introduced all over the country to emphasize the evaluation of talent in the outstanding character, ability, performance, pay attention to the quality of iconic results, contributions, impact. What talents do to evaluate what, heavy ability, heavy level, heavy practice is the "use of this" to become the consensus of all parties.
establish a reasonable evaluation system in order to create a good scientific research ecology, which is also the key issue that the Opinion promotes to solve. The implementation of legal person autonomy and the granting of full autonomy to scientific research units have become the top priority of the reform. Universities and scientific research institutions continue to expand the autonomy of management, reform the management mechanism of funds for scientific research projects, and gradually implement the whole process of open and transparent and trace management. The advance of these policies has gradually resolved the problems that have long constrained the hands and feet of individuals and institutions.
, the expectation of the whole society to the researchers is to be able to calm down and sit on the "cold bench", but in reality it is always difficult to implement. The medium- and long-term performance evaluation system, which is set up under the guidance of Opinions, fully takes into account the practical problems in scientific research, which not only conforms to the reality of scientific and technological innovation, but also ensures the objective and fair evaluation of project undertaker units, so that researchers concentrate and devote themselves to important basic research and major technological innovation.
, "Opinion" focused on scientific researchers to reflect strong problems, put forward targeted, operational reform initiatives, become the scientific and technological community's "heart-stopping pill."
, this "heart-stopping pill" lets more and more researchers really "put down their hearts." Talent "hats" fly, red tape binds hands and feet, reports and approvals waste time... The most troubling problem for researchers has been or is being solved with the further implementation of the Opinions.
We know that building a scientific, standardized, efficient and honest scientific and technological evaluation system is by no means a one-day effort, and it is impossible to create a scientific research atmosphere that is full of research and integrity, but as long as the evaluation mechanism of projects, talents and institutions is constantly improved and the vitality of innovation is fully released, waiting for us must be a healthy, excellent and sustainable scientific research ecological environment.