The regulatory highlights behind the "sky-high little yellow fish".

A few days ago, Mr. Li, a Shenzhen resident, invited a friend to eat at the "1949 Hua home" on the happy coast of Nanshan, Shenzhen, the restaurant did not have a plate, the waiter recommended the East China Sea wild small yellow fish. Mr. Li said he only learned when he bought the bill that he had spent a total of 8,254 yuan, including 4,628 yuan for two fish and 1092.66 yuan for services. Media from the Shenzhen Consumer Council was informed that the business suspected of violating the clear-code price management regulations, will urge it to carry out rectification. Shenzhen Price Supervision and Inspection Bureau has also been to the scene to investigate and collect evidence and file a case, the results of the investigation and processing will be published the first time. (Related reports see A10 version)
if you know that a small yellow fish to sell more than 2000 yuan, you will order? Of course, it is not ruled out that someone is "money-thy-way", but most people should still shake their heads. Even those who are willing to spend money to find a feeling should be clear about spending, rather than eating before they see a sky-high bill. This is also the "sky-high price of small yellow fish" incident at the core of the issue, that is, whether consumers know.
now, operators and consumers are at each other's notice about whether restaurants will inform consumers in advance of the price of small yellow fish in the East China Sea. However, there is a fact that there is no doubt that the operator did not clearly mark the price of the dishes, nor did they inform consumers in advance that they would charge a 15% service fee, which violates the consumer's right to know about consumption. It is precisely because of the existence of such "hard injury", Shenzhen Price Supervision and Inspection Bureau issued a notice of inspection on the spot, and the business has been investigated and prosecuted, ordered to carry out rectification.
face of this "sky-high small yellow fish incident", some people disappointed that the media has reported so much, the relevant parties have also investigated a lot, why is it still not blind? Does this mean that the market is rotten enough to be "cure"? In my opinion, it is a little pessimistic to draw such a conclusion. To be sure, the sky-high price of slaughter is what the public does not want to see. But is the so-called "linzi big what birds have", see people to see the mainstream, look at the market should also look at the mainstream, such a large market appeared one or two adulterers and what strange?
relative to the past media reports of the sky-high slaughter incident, this "sky-high small yellow fish incident", in fact, there are bright spots. In the past, the sky-high killing incident, and ultimately justice was upheld, basically after the media intervention, and this incident is different. From the news, it can be seen that consumer behavior occurred on February 16; consumer complaints to the Shenzhen Consumer Council occurred on February 27; and one day after the complaint, that is, February 28, the Shenzhen Municipal Price Supervision and Inspection Bureau launched a preliminary inspection, and issued a notice of inspection on the spot;
to pursue such an incident process, it can be seen that the relevant departments have basically done to receive complaints on the investigation, and did not wait until after the media reports. Of course, this incident has now become a public event, but the involvement of the relevant departments, before the formation of a public event, not after the formation of a public event. From this point of view, the practice of the relevant departments is commendable. The market is so big, no one can guarantee that there are no few flies, it is important to find flies, the relevant departments to do "smell and move", quickly put out flies. As long as this is done, and long-term efforts continue, the market will eventually return to the clear moon.
may say that this kind of "smell and move" to look good again, but also only the cure. The cure is really important, but to see, did not leave the "standard" of the "ben", nor left the "standard" of the "standard", sometimes the cure is in the cure. As far as market reality is concerned, hooliganism is not terrible, no one cares is terrible. Insist on taking the initiative to attack, out on the fight, will inevitably have a deterrent effect, forcing the market upward to good. It is in this sense that there are regulatory bright spots behind this "sky-high yellow fish incident". Such a bright spot is the starting point for the market to get better.