echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Biochemistry News > Biotechnology News > The universe we exist in is not the first universe ever.

    The universe we exist in is not the first universe ever.

    • Last Update: 2020-08-08
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    The scientists say the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thing that makes old-fashioned television white noise, is evidence of the remains of these "ghost black holes."
    " has been reported by several theoretical physics scientists who claim to have found a key piece of evidence for the existence of the multi-cosmic universe, which is not the first ever universe.
    , a team of leading physicists has found that other universes existed a long time ago, and that they all have black holes, just like the universe we exist today.
    the scientists say that cosmic microwave background radiation , the thing that makes old-fashioned television white noise , is evidence of the remains of these " ghost black holes . "
    this alternative idea was put forward by Roger Penrose, a mathematical physicist at Harvard University, Daniel An, a mathematician at the State University of New York's School of Maritime Science, and Krzysztof Meissner, a theoretical physicist at the University of Warsaw.
    these pioneers are now calling for revisions to the Big Bang theory to better explain this multi-cosmic theory.
    this multi-cosmic theory, also known in the industry as "the circular cosmology", the theory is that the universe is moving forward in an ever-evolving, expanding, and dying cycle.
    and the black holes in each round of the "old universe" leave a mark in the "new universe".
    We can detect these markers in the data we've got from cosmic microwave background radiation, according to the latest data.
    "If the universe persists and the black hole is greedily devouring everything, then when we reach a certain time node, all that is left in our universe is a black hole," Explains Dr Penrose.
    According to our current theory, black holes have been losing their mass over time, but at the same time they are constantly stouing out large amounts of radiation, made up of massless particles known as "gravitationals" and "photons."
    Dr Penrose says that if our current understanding is accurate, what will happen is that these black holes will slowly and slowly collapse.
    eventually, when these black holes reach a certain point, they collapse completely, leaving behind a large number of massless particles.
    according to Einstein's theory of special relativity, these massless particles do not follow the same physical laws as mass matter, which means that although they exist in the universe, they never interact with other matter.
    "So there is no so-called concept of time and space in a universe filled with gravises and photons, " Dr. Ann adds.
    , according to the theory of cosmic microwave background radiation, when a universe is in this "old black hole crash state", it begins to appear in a state of extreme concentration and extreme compression similar to that of the Big Bang.
    and based on this theory, a similar situation has led to similar results.
    , according to Dr Penrose, the evidence of the existence of "ghost black holes" we find in the current cosmic microwave background radiation data is not just in the "singles" described by Hawking, but in the radiation generated throughout their life cycle.
    for now, the obstacle to this group of theoretical physicists and their theory is that they need more evidence in order for their views to be widely accepted.
    if scientists could find evidence in our universe, so much of the heavy cosmology would be recognized by the entire scientific community, or at least not entirely wrong.
    and Dr Penrose believes he has found evidence to explain the phenomenon.
    a team of researchers led by Dr. Penrose, who conducted a statistical analysis, examined the sky in different regions and circled areas of the sky where galaxies and stars would not cover the cosmic microwave background radiation.
    , the data were then compared to those in areas consistent with the microwave frequency distribution and the Hawking singois described.
    , they were then compared to randomly produced pseudo-cosmic microwave background radiation data. The reason
    did this is mainly to rule out the possibility that some Of the Hawking singois were random.
    If these randomly generated cosmic microwave background radiation data can't tell us exactly what these Hawking singomighties are, it's a powerful way to tell us that the newly discovered Hawking singholes are created by the "ghost black holes" that once existed.
    in 2010, Dr Penrose made a similar point in another paper.
    however, his views came under fire from academia, and other similar research teams rejected his conclusions, mocking the data provided by Dr Penrose in an attempt to show that the Hawking oddity was as simple as white noise.
    .
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.