echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Biochemistry News > Biotechnology News > The WHO says the new crown originated in animals, and all the evidence suggests that the new coronavirus came from animals.

    The WHO says the new crown originated in animals, and all the evidence suggests that the new coronavirus came from animals.

    • Last Update: 2020-08-04
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    CCTV News: 21 local time, WHO spokesman Fatila Shaib in response to a question from the main station reporters, said that the current media and social platforms are circulating some myths and conspiracy theories about the origin of the new crown virus, the existing evidence that the new coronavirus originated in animals rather than laboratory man-made.
    General Station reporter Zhu He: Regarding the source of the new crown virus, some media reported the false news of the new crown virus from Wuhan Virus Research Institute, can WHO respond to this and explain it? What does WHO think of such fake news? WHO is fighting a "pandemic" of the new pneumonia epidemic, as well as a "false information pandemic", WHO spokesman Shaib said.
    when a new virus like the new crown virus appears, there will be a lot of false speculation about the source of the virus spread ingress ingons in the media, including social media.
    What I can tell you is that all the evidence suggests that the new coronavirus is from animals, not made or controlled by a laboratory or someone else."
    the new coronavirus most likely comes from the bats of nature, but it is not clear how it was transmitted to humans, and there must be an intermediate host, meaning that the virus is transmitted from bats to humans by another animal.
    Shayb said WHO welcomes national researchers' efforts to find new sources of the virus, which are being done by several teams, including those from China.
    he stressed that the common focus of the parties should be facts, not fear.
    to find the origin and origin of the new coronavirus is critical, and WHO is participating in scientific research by a large number of experts.
    WHO spokesman: The available evidence shows that the new crown virus originated in animals, bats are most likely to be the owner of the World Health Organization spokesman said on the 21st, the current media and social platforms circulating some myths and conspiracy theories about the origin of the new coronavirus.
    WHO believes that, as far as available evidence suggests, the virus originated in animals rather than from laboratory man-made.
    WHO spokesman Fadla Shaib told a regular press briefing at the United Nations office in Geneva that the organization is currently fighting two "pandemics": the New Crown pandemic and the "false information pandemic."
    in response to some of the recent myths about the origin of the new coronavirus circulating on the media and social platforms, she said all the known evidence suggests that the virus originated in animals, not by human intervention or manufacture by the laboratory.
    , she says, is now the most likely reservoir of such viruses in nature.
    it is not known how the new coronavirus was transmitted from bats to humans.
    there must be an intermediate host, which means that the virus is transmitted from bat to human being by another animal.
    WHO welcomes national scientists' efforts to find new sources of the virus, which are being done by several teams, including from China.
    Fadla Shayb stressed that the common focus of the parties should be facts, not fear.
    to find the origin and origin of the new coronavirus is critical, and WHO is participating in scientific research by a large number of experts.
    are riddled with holes! U.S. scientists have dismissed the "new crown virus originating in the lab": it may only come from natural sources, according to Fox News, the U.S. government is conducting an investigation into the origin of the new coronavirus.
    Fox quoted sources as saying that U.S. officials and intelligence agencies are increasingly inclined to "new crown virus" from a laboratory in Wuhan, and that the purpose of the development is not a biological weapon, but to show that China's ability to respond to the virus is no less than that of the United States.
    however, many scientific researchers have pointed out the false and flawed nature of this judgment, and through the latest research further stressed that the virus originated in nature.
    Scientific Comparative Study: The new coronavirus is naturally occurring, a study of public genetic sequences of new coronaviruses and related viruses shows that there is no evidence that the virus was manufactured in the laboratory or designed by someone else.
    the study was carried out by Christian Anderson, an assistant professor of immunology and microbiology at the Scripps Institution, and his team, and the final results were published in the American Journal of Natural Science. Professor
    Anderson said: "After comparing the public genetic sequence data of available coronavirus strains, we are very sure that the new coronavirus comes from nature.
    " the article says this view is supported mainly by two points: If a virus is to be manufactured in the laboratory, it must be developed by the backbone of a known virus.
    but the study found that the new coronavirus has a different backbone than any known human virus.
    . Scientists have found that the proteinins in the "spike" part of the new coronavirus have a strong ability to bind to human cells, which can only be derived from natural evolution.
    "I'm sorry, conspiracy theorists, studies show that the new corona outbreak doesn't come from lab manufacturing," according to ABC, Dr. Robert Gehry of Tulane University School of Medicine, who also confirmed in his blog that the new coronavirus does not come from the lab' view: "The coronavirus is usually connected to human cells through the 'spike' part, and over time, each coronavirus will appear different at this point."
    the new coronavirus has a unique evolution in its spike protein.
    in addition, the backbone of the new coronavirus is not exactly consistent with any other virus, proving that the virus is not manufactured in the laboratory". Dr.
    told ABC that it is not possible to confirm exactly when the virus's surface proteins mutated and whether the mutation was the starting point for the outbreak.
    the virus may have existed for a long time, but the disease is weak and therefore undetected.
    but either way, it's a natural process.
    U.S. media reported that Peter Dashjak, president of the Ecohealth Alliance and a disease ecologist, said Trump's allegations that the virus originated in the lab were "nonsense," according to Democracy Now.
    ", Newsweek reported, the U.S. defense secretary said that while the study is not conclusive, most of the assessments point to the natural origin of COVID-19, not synthetic.
    scientists put forward the hypothesis about the origin of the virus, Anderson and his team made two assumptions about the natural origin of the new coronavirus: in the first case, the virus naturally evolved pathogenicininins in non-human hosts and transferred from animals to humans;
    no conclusion has been reached to support any of these assumptions.
    But if the final situation is the first hypothesis, there is still a possibility of a future outbreak of the virus -- because its disease-causing capacity still spreads through nature.
    if it's the second assumption, the risk is slightly lower.
    refuting the false claims made by the New Crown Virus from the Wuhan Laboratory, Business Insider reported that Shi Zhengli, a researcher and virologist at the BSL-4 Laboratory in Wuhan, sequenced the virus with her team after the COVID-19 outbreak.
    after a rapid investigation of the accident based on laboratory records from the past few years, she told Scientific American that the new coronavirus genome did not match those collected by her team from bats.
    this further refutes false claims that the virus originated in a Wuhan laboratory. Anthony Fauci, director of the Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the
    National Institute of Health, has also publicly rejected the conspiracy theory that the new coronavirus was made in chinese laboratories. "The virus's genes prove that it was transmitted from animals to humans, not from artificial modifications in the lab," Mr.
    said at a White House press conference.
    "Source: Integrated Xinhua Viewpoint, CCTV News Client Source: North Evening New Vision Network.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.