The year-end assessment of the public defender is coming again

Special contributor: good as water Unconsciously, a year is about to pass, and it's time to test the efficiency of public health government investment and actual output The public defenders who have been busy for a year will face the annual performance evaluation Public defenders are both looking forward to and afraid of it They hope that they can enter the stage of sorting out, and can take a little breath What they fear is that they will not rank well after assessment, which will affect their performance income in the next year There must be criteria for assessment Some people say that the standards are not easy to work out, so it's OK to take the ones from last year and change them, or learn from the plans of brother units and make a little change, which saves time and effort In fact, this is not desirable The assessment standard is a ruler to test the development of basic public health service projects, an effective means to test the effectiveness of the project work, and an important basis for the implementation and Realization of service funds The assessment standard of perfunctory work has no effect and can not serve the public What we need to promote, what we need to assess, we need to play the guiding role of performance evaluation Only in this way can we establish good standards, test competitiveness, form a good service atmosphere of solid service and striving for excellence, and give play to the incentive mechanism of encouraging the advanced and encouraging the backward The author thinks that the establishment of performance evaluation and evaluation standards for public health projects can be combined with the following aspects: National basic public health service standard, recent superior assessment standard, key work arrangement of this year, target and task formulated at the beginning of the year, annual plan or implementation plan printed and issued by the superior, authenticity of service, awareness rate of the masses, sense of acquisition, satisfaction, etc The public defender of the hospital is both an athlete and a referee To assess the village doctors, he must accept the assessment of all levels of higher authorities Therefore, it is very important to prepare for the examination Generally speaking, the assessment takes the form of listening to reports, reading materials, telephone follow-up, household investigation, etc a good report material is the basis The report should be based on the task objectives set at the beginning of the year and the completion of various work in the past year, and reflect the workload of public health services and the benefits of the masses Second, improve the relevant information one by one according to the performance evaluation and evaluation standards Third, in daily service, we should put an end to deception, be practical, detailed and do a good job in various services I work hard at ordinary times, and I'm not afraid of the examination Fourth, we should check the omissions and make up for the deficiencies, and carefully compare the implementation plan and assessment standards of the work at the beginning of the year to implement one by one, so as to avoid the occurrence of omissions 1、 To be assessed in order to meet the assessment of the superior 2、 Key services are not assessed or have low scores, non key work has high scores, and performance evaluation orientation is not high 3、 In the assessment, double standards and multiple standards are used, and even artificial "fine-tuning" is carried out for some purpose This practice has lost the principle of "openness, fairness and justice", and the role of "encouraging the advanced and encouraging the backward" in the assessment 1、 Third party performance evaluation organizations should be established to avoid human interference, and the evaluation results will be more fair and just 2、 Guide and vigorously carry out publicity work, publicity throughout the service, steadily improve the awareness rate of the project, and improve the enthusiasm of the masses to participate 3、 Fighting against counterfeits and false services will damage the image of the government and waste valuable resources.