-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Ingredient
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">Recently, a well-known beverage brand issued a product upgrade announcement, which was once a hot search.
It is about changing " 0 sucrose and low fat" to "low sugar and low fat" on the outer packaging of one of its milk tea products .
The reason given is: "The difference between " 0 sucrose" and " 0 sugar" is not clearly stated , which can easily lead to misunderstandings.
"
0000pt;">Recently, a well-known beverage brand issued a product upgrade announcement, which was once a hot search.
It is about changing " 0 sucrose and low fat" to "low sugar and low fat" on the outer packaging of one of its milk tea products .
The reason given was: " The difference between " 0 sucrose" and " 0 sugar" is 5000pt;<em></em><em></em> mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">not clearly stated 5000pt;<em></em><em></em> mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">, which may easily lead to misunderstanding.
" Recently, a well-known beverage brand issued a product upgrade announcement, which was once a hot search.
It is about changing " 0 sucrose and low fat" to "low sugar and low fat" on the outer packaging of one of its milk tea products .
The reason given is: "The difference between " 0 sucrose" and " 0 sugar" is not clearly stated , which can easily lead to misunderstandings.
"
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">
0000pt;">
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">After seeing this announcement, Dafu was a little bit lucky in his shock.
I thought: "Fortunately, not all food companies have such a sense of responsibility.
Otherwise, what do we do about food science!" 5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">Today we will talk about "no sugar " , "low sugar" and "0 sucrose ".
The difference.
Behind the seemingly simple words "no sugar" and "low sugar", there are actually strict national standards ( GB 28050-2011 "National Food Safety Standards for Nutrition Labeling of Prepackaged Foods").
0000pt;">After seeing this announcement, Dafu was a little bit lucky in his shock.
I thought: "Fortunately, not all food companies have such a sense of responsibility.
Otherwise, what about our food science popularization!" Seeing this announcement, Dafu was still a little lucky in his shock.
I thought: "Fortunately, not all food companies have such a sense of responsibility.
Otherwise, what do we do about food science!" 5000pt;<em></em><em></em> mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">Today we will talk about "no sugar " , "low sugar" and "0 sucrose ".
The difference.
Behind the seemingly simple words "no sugar" and "low sugar", there are actually strict national standards ( GB 28050-2011 "National Food Safety Standards for Nutrition Labeling of Prepackaged Foods").
Today we will talk about the difference between "no sugar " , "low sugar" and "0 sucrose " .
Behind the seemingly simple words "no sugar" and "low sugar", there are actually strict national standards ( GB 28050-2011 "National Food Safety Standards for Nutrition Labeling of Prepackaged Foods").
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">
0000pt;">
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">To use an analogy, the terms "no sugar" and "low sugar" are just like official bans.
There are standards, and you must be responsible if you talk nonsense.
And "no sucrose" is self->Before Monkey King learned the scriptures, its official title was just "Bi Ma Wen", and "The Monkey King" was self-proclaimed.
Therefore, the first impression of a monster with a background is that of Monkey King, the "Bima Wen" who made trouble in the Heavenly Palace five hundred years ago.
0000pt;">To use an analogy, the terms "no sugar" and "low sugar" are just like official bans.
There are standards, and you must be responsible if you talk nonsense.
And "no sucrose" is self->Before Monkey King learned the scriptures, its official title was just "Bi Ma Wen", and "The Monkey King" was self-proclaimed.
Therefore, the first impression of a monster with a background is that of Monkey King, the "Bima Wen" who made trouble in the Heavenly Palace five hundred years ago.
To use an analogy, the terms "no sugar" and "low sugar" are just like official bans.
There are standards, and you must be responsible if you talk nonsense.
And "no sucrose" is self->Before Monkey King learned the scriptures, its official title was just "Bi Ma Wen", and "The Monkey King" was self-proclaimed.
Therefore, the first impression of a monster with a background is that of Monkey King, the "Bima Wen" who made trouble in the Heavenly Palace five hundred years ago.
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">
0000pt;">
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">As stated in the announcement, consumers are very easy to confuse the concepts of "no sugar" and " 0 sucrose".
Most of the foods labeled " 0 sucrose" just want to use the concept of "sugar-free" to make more money.
Healthy people are okay.
Drinking a bit of fat at most, for special people such as diabetic people, eating indiscriminately is harmful to the body.
Sadly, this phenomenon is not uncommon.
5000pt;<em></em><em></em>
mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">
0000pt;">As stated in the announcement, consumers are very easy to confuse the concepts of "no sugar" and " 0 sucrose".
5000pt;<em></em><em></em> mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">Of course, this time some food companies took the initiative to modify packaging information and product formulas, which is related to their brand positioning.
Since it is advocating the concept of health, it has to be more rigorous for long-term planning, but I still hope that food companies can be more self-disciplined.
If one day, all food companies can not play the side ball, do not play the trick of confusing concepts, we can do science popularization and "re-employment"
5000pt;<em></em><em></em> mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">upright 5000pt;<em></em><em></em> mso-font-kerning:1.
0000pt;">! Of course, this time some food companies took the initiative to modify packaging information and product formulas, which is related to their brand positioning.
Since it is advocating the concept of health, it has to be more rigorous for long-term planning, but I still hope that food companies can be more self-disciplined.
If one day, all food companies can stop playing side-by-side, and don't play tricks that confuse concepts, we will be able to "re-employ" upright in popular science !