-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Ingredient
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
In today (26) afternoon held in Shanghai epidemic prevention and control work press conference, a reporter asked, last night Shanghai Red House Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital informed that the hospital in the nucleic acid test found individual unqualified samples, non-conforming samples and the previous nucleic acid test results suspicious what difference? Shanghai Health And Safety Commission Director Yan Zhilei introduced that any test sample collection, transportation, processing, testing have norms and standards, the hospital in the testing process, found that the specimen is not qualified, which and the test results are suspicious is not the same.
if the samples collected are not qualified, they cannot be tested.
Red House found the specimen unqualified yesterday, it immediately resampled and conducted a parallel review.
the final results, we have seen that the hospital on January 25th routine new coronary pneumonia nucleic acid testing has been completed, are negative, we responded to social concerns in a timely manner.
in the epidemic prevention work, sampling, killing personnel wearing white clothes, we do not have to panic, hope that the public believe in our professional handling, I believe that the relevant departments will be timely and transparent.
some circumstances, to the final scientific judgment, there will certainly be a time difference, I hope you understand, give us time to make accurate judgments, to solve the mystery.
CCTV News Client Source: CCTV News Client Copyright Notice: All text, images and audio and video materials that indicate "Source: Mets Medicine" or "Source: MedSci Originals" on this website belong to Mets Medical, which is not authorized, and any media, website or individual may not be reproduced, and the authorised reprint must indicate "Source: Mets Medicine".
all reprinted articles on this website are for the purpose of transmitting more information and clearly indicate the source and author, and media or individuals who do not wish to be reproduced may contact us and we will delete them immediately.
at the same time reproduced content does not represent the position of this site.
leave a message here