What the hell is he afraid of when an American pharmacist deliberately destroys 500 doses of vaccine?

Currently, two new crown mRNA vaccines have been approved internationally, one for BNT162b2 developed jointly by BioNTech of Germany, Pfizer of the United States and Fosun Pharma of China, and the other for Moderna of the United States.
vaccines showed protection rates of 95% and 94.1%, respectively, in Phase 3 clinical trials.
the United States, 4.5 million people had been vaccinated against the first dose of mRNA as of January 4, 2021.
, under a cooperation agreement between BioNTech and Fosun Pharma in Germany, 100 million doses of mRNA vaccine will be available on the chinese market this year, after Chinese mainland approval from China's drug regulatory agency.
the protection of the mRNA vaccine is good, how safe is it? This is a matter of concern to many people.
1 mRNA vaccine is not a genetically modified vaccine see a saying that the mRNA vaccine is a genetically modified product.
do not want to discuss the safety of genetically modified, just want to figure out what is genetically modified? Gmos are commonly referred to as genetically modified foods or crops.
Through genetic engineering, new genes are permanently transferred to a species, allowing crops to gain excellent insect resistance, or to increase tolerance to herbicides and droughts, which is what GM wants to achieve.
to give food and crops this new performance, it's important that the genes that are transferred are always expressed.
such as encountering arid climate, the general rice does not feel good, but genetically modified rice because it can express drought-tolerant genes, will still feel very cool, and must always express has been cool.
think about it, drought is not just a matter of two days a day, if only a brief expression, then the real drought is equivalent to no use.
mRNA is also a form of gene, seeing the mRNA vaccine into the human body, some people may feel that people have been transferred a gene! It's also a false feeling.
mRNA half-life is very short, very unstable, it is very unstable, it is the need for low temperature preservation.
the mRNA in the current vaccine, although modified to extend the half-life of the body, but only a few hours, within a few days, the mRNA vaccine will disappear from the body.
if the mRNA vaccine is so unstable, how can we maintain its protective effect? In fact, the role of the vaccine, only to stimulate the immune system, after the vaccine into the human body, human cells will use the mRNA in the vaccine, to create antigens, enough to induce an immune response.
really protect the body is the immune system.
, if there's a trial to describe what the mRNA vaccine does, it's "something dusted off, deep in merit and name."
because the virus's genes are not permanently inserted into human cells, the mRNA vaccine cannot be called a genetically modified vaccine.
2 An American has destroyed 500 doses of the vaccine because it alters human DNA, and although the mRNA vaccine has not been present in the human body for a long time, some people still worry that as soon as they enter the human body, the mRNA will have a chance to be integrated into the human chromosome and long-term presence in the human body.
the last day of 2020, a pharmacist in Wisconsin deliberately left 500 doses at room temperature for long periods of time, causing the vaccine to fail.
, according to investigators, the pharmacist deliberately destroyed the vaccine because of concerns that "the vaccine could cause harm by altering people's DNA."
found that the man was divorced from his wife and had twice taken a gun to work...Perhaps the pharmacist's focus should be on the problems facing life, to solve the immediate problems, they and the people around them will be less hurt.
pharmacist in Wisconsin and others who worry that the vaccine could alter human DNA may not be aware of the position in human cells.
chromosomes that carry the human genome and are present in the nuclei of cells, which are encased in nuclear membranes.
for the mRNA vaccine, the nanoparticle vector of the vaccine simply sends mRNA into the cytoste and does not need to enter the nucleation at all.
: How can the mRNA vaccine principle be integrated into the human genome if it doesn't even enter the nucleus? So, worrying about gene integration in the mRNA vaccine is a bit of a concern.
3 Whether it's a vaccine or a new coronavirus, to integrate into the human genome, you need a fulcum that can pry the earth! Data show that about 8% of the human genome comes from a variety of viruses! Contamination of the human genome by viral genes may be the cause of concerns about the mRNA vaccine.
, however, these viral genes that are integrated into the human genome come from retrovirus, which carries RNA that, after reverse transcription, becomes DNA before they have a chance to be integrated into the human genome.
new coronavirus is an RNA virus, but not a "reverse RNA virus", so it is common knowledge that the genes of the new coronavirus are not integrated into human chromosomes.
only fragments of the virus S protein were used in the mRNA vaccine, let snippets, not to be dangerous.
However, a recent paper has been published showing that if reverse transcriptases are added, the RNA of the new coronavirus can also be reversed into DNA in inosomal cell experiments and integrated into the genes of human cells.
Thye news may be bad news for melon-eating people who lack expertise, but please note that this is just an extra-physical experiment, that is, what happens in a cell dish, not really in the human body.
You think, if what happens in a cell dish can be reproduced in the body, is it necessary to conduct clinical trials in the thousands of in vitro cancer trials published each year?" Can be used directly for treatment! Not only the world's cancer has been extinguished several rounds, the new coronavirus has also been disinfectant group, everyone has eaten can return to old age and children's long-term medicine! But in-body testing is also only in-body testing, is only a very remote possibility, as research can be boldly explored, but in the treatment, prevention, but can not simply be believed to be true.
this, the average person might think that as long as that possibility exists, it can happen after all.
to this, I would like to quote Archimedes: Give me a fulcity, I can pry up the whole earth! The same possibility exists, as Archimedes says, but what he lacks is it? Not! What he really lacks is this fulcum that can pry the earth! If there is a real concern about the integration of viral genes into the human genome, it is even more important to be vaccinated, because if not vaccinated, the final probability will be infected by the virus, there will be a large number of virus genes into the human body. the safety of the
4 mRNA vaccine has been tested in clinical trials Based on the results of Phase 3 clinical trials, common side effects after the BNT162b2mRNA vaccine include pain, swelling, redness at the injection site in the arm, and possible systemic fever, fear of cold, fatigue, headache and other symptoms.
these common side effects are mostly non-serious, short-lived, one-on-one, and appear within a day or two of vaccination, but then disappear.
in phase III clinical trials of BNT162b2, six participants died, but four in the placebo group, two in the vaccine group, and more deaths in the placebo group than in the vaccine group.
analysis showed that there was no direct relationship between these deaths and vaccinations, with both deaths occurring when the vaccinators were older than 55 years of age, one of whom went into cardiac arrest 62 days after vaccination and died three days later, and the other died of atherosclerosis three days after vaccination.
without a control group of Phase 3 clinical trials, it is difficult to say whether adverse events after vaccination are vaccine-related.
from the above-mentioned deaths can also be seen, after vaccination of adverse events, does not mean that the side effects of the vaccine.
if the concept is not clear, but the whole country began to spread vaccinations on a large scale, it will cause panic! Why is that? Because the people most in need of vaccine protection are the elderly, this group is also the most vulnerable to natural diseases.
of adverse events in clinical trials, there were four cases of Bell's palsy in the vaccine group and no similar adverse events occurred in the placebo group.
, commonly known as facial palsy, has a natural annual rate of 20 to 30 per 100,000 people, but 70% of facial palsy heals itself within a few months and does not require treatment.
four cases of facial paralysis appeared in the vaccine group, statistical analysis showed that the rate was not significantly higher than that of the control group, nor was it significantly higher than the range of natural occurrence.
the mRNA vaccine developed severe allergies during the mass vaccination process following the approval of the vaccine, but only at the beginning of the pile-up, after the expansion of the vaccination, the number of cases of severe allergies did not increase accordingly.
the CDC currently believes that even people with a history of allergies can get an mRNA vaccine as long as they are not allergic to polyg or polysorbital.
polyglycol is an ingredient in the vaccine, polysorbital does not exist in the vaccine, but is similar to polyglycol.
if you develop a severe allergy, it will occur immediately after vaccination.
in current vaccinations, the average person needs to observe for 15 minutes to leave, or 30 minutes if they have a history of allergies.
such an operation, in case of severe allergy symptoms, can take timely first aid measures.
that vaccines that do not have side effects at all do not exist, and the risks that can be posed by current vaccinations are entirely acceptable in relation to the protection that mRNA vaccines can bring.
5 Concerns about the long-term safety of the mRNA vaccine should not be used as an excuse to block vaccination The two mRNA vaccines are currently authorized for emergency use in the United States, often called emergency approvals, not only because there have been enough cases in Phase 3 clinical trials to obtain reliable data on vaccine protection rates, but also because half of the volunteers have been observed for two months after receiving the vaccine and have obtained sufficient safety data.
you set a two-month time point in time? Because for vaccines, side effects usually occur within 6 weeks if they occur after vaccination.
BNT162b2 Phase 3 clinical trials have 44,000 people and more than 20,000 vaccine groups, so tens of thousands of people have been observed for at least two months, and if there are any adverse reactions, they should be fully observed.
, if it is a very low probability adverse event, it can only be observed in larger-scale promotional vaccinations.
after the vaccine be launched, cdcs in all countries have mechanisms to monitor adverse reactions to vaccination.
from the design of clinical trials to post-market testing mechanisms, are designed to ensure the safety of vaccines.
but there is a saying that although the safety of mRNA does not appear to be a big problem at present, but the long-term risk is unknown, because mRNA is a new thing, has never been successful in the human body! This actually has a familiar taste, a bit like a hundred years ago people suddenly saw the camera, feel a little panicked, because of fear that the soul will be taken away.
mRNA vaccine, although a new technology, did not suddenly jump out of the stone seams, in fact, has been more than 10 years of research.
to say that mRNA technology has never been successful in the human body is very misleading! First, although the new crown mRNA vaccine is the first approved vaccine to be used, mRNA technology has been previously entered into clinical trials.
, no success, does not mean that has failed, nor does it mean that there have been security problems.
mRNA technology from BioNTech, Germany, is already conducting clinical trials for cancer, and Moderna's mRNA technology is also being used to make CMV virus vaccines, Zika virus vaccines, and related clinical trials.
other vaccines are also for healthy people, so this isn't the first time humans have hit healthy people with RNA.
of a vaccine is usually years or even decades old.
's previous mRNA vaccine has not yet been successful, but the research process is already very long, and the new crown vaccine can be launched within a year, mainly because the new crown outbreak is too severe, leading to rapid progress in clinical trials, while several Phase 3 clinical trials, the size of 30,000, 40,000 people, is unprecedented, clinical trials are also designed to obtain the results of Phase 3 trials within a year.
in law, there is a word called "presumption of innocence", that is, a person cannot be presumed guilty until evidence of a crime has been found.
the safety of medicines and vaccines, the principle of "presumption of innocence" could not be simply used, presumed from the outset that there were no safety issues.
that's why Phase 3 clinical trials are so important.
if safety data has been obtained from clinical trials, we can put aside our fear of the so-called "long-term safety" of the vaccine, gradually promote vaccination, and monitor the population to see if there are so-called safety issues.
this time, there is enough data to support the vaccine's "presumpt that there are no long-term safety issues."
who wants to be suspicious should give evidence, rather than using "long-term safety issues" as an excuse to block the use of mRNA vaccines.
people are actually worried about "long-term safety" and there is no real evidence, just a fear of vaccines.
If there is nothing to be done, caution is no ex exercise, but in the face of the outbreak, vaccines have become the only hope to end the global epidemic, the real fear should be crazy virus, is the endless outbreak.
can't ignore the high probability event of being infected with the virus because there are unknown small probability events.
may have a small heart: others have been vaccinated, forming a group immunity, that self