echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Biochemistry News > Biotechnology News > Wuhan Virus Research Institute Shi Zhengli again voice: the new crown virus is not man-made!

    Wuhan Virus Research Institute Shi Zhengli again voice: the new crown virus is not man-made!

    • Last Update: 2020-08-04
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Source: Facing the media, the Southern Metropolis Daily long-lost Shi Zhengli voice again: not artificial "straight-faced media" do not know when to start, the virus from the institute's news began to roar on the dust.
    Despite repeated official denials, many people's doubts have not been dispelled because no precise source has been found.
    even the most authoritative Zhong Nanshan publicly said that the virus does not necessarily originate in China.
    severe outbreak, Wuhan virus has been at the forefront of the wind.
    is not clear why, there are various rumors about the institute.
    as an authoritative scientific research institution, why is it too deep in the vortex to extricate itself? The virus has been questioned, but Shi Zhengli has chosen to stay away from the public and the media.
    days ago, the long-lost Shi Zhengli finally came to the public, in response to her can answer the question.
    biggest question is whether the virus came from the institute.
    although this topic is nothing new, but Shi Zhengli seems to have to face it clearly.
    Nandu's report said: In the face of the public, Shi Zhengli clearly clarified that the new coronavirus is absolutely not man-made.
    her statement was held on March 9 at 8 p.m., the second phase of a series of "2020 Scientific Anti-Epidemic" popular science public welfare activities.
    event hosted by the Capital Medical University President Rao Yi and others launched the "Intellectual Science research institute" and Tencent, and the guest is Shi Zhengli.
    media said: This is her first time since the outbreak, the audience on the new coronavirus-related situation science.
    Shi Zhengli said in a live broadcast that when SARS coronavirus spread in 2003, Hong Kong scientists successfully collected samples before the market closed in Guangdong, and soon found the intermediate host of the virus, which is 99.7 percent homologous, and then spent eight years in the academic community finding the virus's source host was the bat.
    Shi Zhengli said that in the new coronavirus, because of the closure of the South China seafood market, the collection of wildlife samples has been missing.
    in this case, she believes that finding the middle host of the new crown virus is to need patients to understand what wild animals they have come into contact with, and to understand where these animals come from through people who sell them.
    Shi Zhengli even suggests that natural host bats need to be in the main habitat, such as Yunnan and other places to find traces.
    the new coronavirus has been confirmed as the same source as SARS coronavirus "sister virus", some studies have pointed out that the new coronavirus and SARS virus compared to the genetic sequence PRRA site differences, suspected to have "artificial insertion" traces, triggering the netizens on the "new coronavirus is artificial" speculation.
    explains that studies have shown that PRRA sites consistent with the new coronavirus have been found in the coronavirus escants extracted by bats.
    "this proves that this site is not artificially inserted, it is in the bat population." Another article
    Caixin reported Shi Zhengli's response to another suspicion. On the evening of March 9,
    , Shi Zhengli, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virus Studies of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said in an online science lecture entitled "Knowing YourSelf - Understanding the New Coronavirus" in Intellectuals: "In 2018 I judged that the cross-infection of SARS-like coronavirus in bats would be a high probability event, but I didn't expect it to happen at the end of 2019 in the city where I live (Wuhan).
    " it is worth mentioning that Caixin's report said: Some listeners asked Shi Zhengli whether the closure of the South China seafood market, widely believed to be the source of the new crown epidemic, on January 1st, would make it difficult to trace the virus.
    she admits that the problem does exist.
    when the SARS virus was traced, Hong Kong scientists rushed to collect animal samples from the Guangdong market before the market closed, and soon found that the SARS virus is up to 99.7% of the virus, which was the first time to find an intermediate host.
    and the natural host, stone, took eight years to find it, "timely collection of wildlife or wildlife on the market, this link is no longer."
    " she said, there are two ways to trace the virus in the event of this loss: first, through patient tracing, "where are the animals they trade in after closing the market?" Where did their animals come from in the first time? We need to know where it comes from"; the second is to go where the natural host exists, "for example, we found the coronavirus in Yunnan that is closest to this virus, and whether it can be found in Yunnan and some surrounding countries, from bats and domesticated wild animals." Shi Zhengli,
    Wuhan Virus Research Institute: The new crown virus is by no means man-made, it is recommended to go to bat habitat to trace the origin of the Southern Metropolis Daily on the evening of March 9, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan Virus Research Institute, the director of the new infectious disease research center Shi Zhengli as a guest of Tencent "2020 scientific anti-epidemic" online public welfare class.
    clarified that the new coronavirus was by no means man-made, and that the closure of the South China seafood market did make it difficult to trace the source of the new crown virus intermediate host.
    she cautions that the next bat coronavirus cross-ethnic infection is still a high probability event.
    the closure of the South China Seafood Market to let the wildlife sample collection link missing march 9 at 8 pm, by the Capital Medical University President Rao Yi and others launched by the "Intellectual Research Institute" and Tencent Classroom co-sponsored by the "2020 Scientific Anti-Epidemic" series of popular science public welfare live activities, the second phase of the broadcast, invited guests are Shi Zhengli.
    this is the first time since the outbreak, she has opened up to the audience on the new coronavirus-related situation of science.
    Shi Zhengli pointed out in the broadcast that when SARS coronavirus spread in 2003, Hong Kong scientists in Guangdong before the market closed, successfully collected samples, quickly found the SARS coronavirus homologous 99.7% of the virus intermediate host, and then, after eight years, the academic community found the source of the virus is the bat.
    Shi Zhengli said that in the new coronavirus, because of the closure of the South China seafood market, the collection of wildlife samples has been missing.
    in this case, she believes that finding the middle host of the new crown virus is to need patients to understand what wild animals they have come into contact with, and to understand where these animals come from through people who sell them.
    Shi Zhengli also suggests that natural host bats need to be in the main habitat, such as Yunnan and other places to find traces.
    the new coronavirus is by no means man-made, and the new coronavirus, which has been found in bats with a controversial gene site, has been confirmed to be the "sister virus" of the same origin as the SARS coronavirus.
    Nandu reporter learned that previous studies pointed out that the new coronavirus and SARS virus compared to the genetic sequence PRRA site differences, suspected of "artificial insertion" traces, triggering netizens on the "new coronavirus is artificial" speculation.
    in the live class, Shi Zhengli clearly clarified that the new coronavirus is definitely not man-made.
    explains that studies have shown that PRRA sites consistent with the new coronavirus have been found in the coronavirus escants extracted by bats.
    "this proves that this site is not artificially inserted, it is in the bat population."
    the bat coronavirus direct transmission probability is low, still a high probability of the next new coronavirus in the bat can directly infect humans? Shi Zhengli said his team found that antibodies to the SARS coronavirus were detected in people in close contact with bats, indicating signs of infection in humans, but that they had no clinical symptoms. "This suggests that bats have a chance of infecting people, but the probability is low, and the body's immune system is able to remove the virus,"
    . "I didn't think the new bat SARS virus would be in the end of 2019, and in the city where I live, "
    .
    " Shi Zhengli concluded by saying that of the 12 coronaviruses his team extracted from bats, the SARS coronavirus is the most contagious.
    she reminded that SARS coronavirus cross-ethnic infection will still be a high probability event, the next new coronavirus may still be possible, should be taken in advance to do a good job of prevention.
    Source: Face Media, Nandu.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.