Hot Topics in Finance Exam 431: Acquisitions

This classification is based on whether the acquisition constitutes a legal obligation. A voluntary acquisition refers to an acquisition carried out by the acquirer at a time of their own choosing, according to their own will. In contrast, a mandatory acquisition arises when a major shareholder’s stake in a company reaches a legally prescribed threshold, thereby obligating them—under law—to launch a full tender offer within a specified timeframe. In a sense, this distinction is relative, because, legally speaking, acquisitions of listed companies are fundamentally grounded in the acquirer’s voluntary intent. Every acquisition represents a planned, lawful purchase of the target company’s shares by the acquirer; even when the shareholding ratio triggers the mandatory acquisition requirement, in most cases such an outcome is already part of the acquirer’s strategic plan. Moreover, even in mandatory acquisitions, the law affords maximum respect to the acquirer’s volition. For instance, Article 81 of China’s Securities Law stipulates that the emergence of an investor’s ‘mandatory obligation’ hinges not only on holding ‘30% or more of a listed company’s issued shares’, but also requires the investor’s explicit ‘intention to continue acquiring’—thereby respecting the investor’s autonomous will to a significant degree. 6. Sole Acquisition vs. Joint Acquisition This classification is based on whether the acquirer is a single entity or multiple entities. A sole acquisition refers to an acquisition carried out independently by one natural person or legal entity. A joint acquisition, by contrast, refers to a coordinated effort by two or more natural persons or legal entities—pursuant to formal or informal agreements—to jointly acquire shares of a target listed company with the aim of gaining control over it. China’s Securities Law makes no mention of ‘joint acquirers’, and even abandons the concept of ‘direct or indirect holdings’ previously found in the Stock Regulations. Arguably, defining ‘joint acquirers’ is an unavoidable regulatory issue in the context of listed companies; hence, some scholars have proposed that relevant provisions should be refined in detailed rules governing listed company acquisitions—and that Chinese legislation should draw upon the Anglo-American concept of ‘persons acting in concert’. 7. Cash Acquisition, Share-for-Share Acquisition, and Mixed Acquisition This classification is based on differences in the consideration paid to the target company. A cash acquisition refers to an acquisition in which the acquirer pays cash to the target company’s shareholders. This is the simplest payment method: target shareholders receive immediate liquidity and thus avoid interest-rate risk; meanwhile, the acquiring company avoids granting target shareholders substantial voting rights in its own organization. However, cash acquisitions carry significant drawbacks. For the acquirer, disbursing large sums of cash may severely strain liquidity and jeopardize financial stability; for the sellers, cash payments trigger immediate tax liabilities, thereby diminishing their net wealth. A share-for-share acquisition refers to an acquisition whereby the acquirer issues its own shares to the target company’s shareholders in exchange for their shares—thereby achieving control over the target. From the acquirer’s perspective, share-based payment reduces cash outlay; from the sellers’ perspective, it defers capital gains taxation and allows them to retain an equity stake in the acquiring company. Yet share-based payment also entails disadvantages. For sellers, the acquirer’s shares represent merely ‘fictitious capital’—a decline in share price would directly erode their wealth. For the acquirer, issuing large numbers of its own shares to sellers may dilute existing shareholders’ voting power and even enable sellers to seize control of the acquirer itself.

19. How Do Mergers & Acquisitions of U.S. Public Companies Work? A Practical Guide

In our previous discussion, we covered the fundamental types of M&A, explored M&A mechanisms arising from specialized terminology, and reviewed classic Wall Street dramas such as ‘poison pills’ and ‘hostile takeover battles.’ Over the next two articles, we will separately outline the core frameworks and procedural flows governing M&A involving U.S. public companies (i.e., listed companies) and U.S. private companies (i.e., unlisted companies). These summaries adopt a more ‘practical guide’ approach, helping readers truly understand how a transaction advances step-by-step along the rails of law and institutional procedure. When we shift our focus squarely to ‘M&A involving U.S. public companies,’ there is no need to be intimidated by complex jargon. Grasping the underlying logic requires focusing on just a few key concepts: numerous and dispersed shareholders; board-centric governance; process-driven execution; and transparency of information. Within this regulatory framework—no matter how dramatic Wall Street narratives become—every public-company M&A transaction inevitably follows clearly defined procedural designs, strict disclosure requirements, and a ‘game of博弈’ between buyer and target that is simultaneously adversarial and collaborative. A follow-up article will further deepen understanding through real-world case studies illustrating core operational practices. This article covers: 1. Mergers (‘merger’) as the predominant form of U.S. public-company M&A 2. Friendly mergers involving U.S. public companies 3. Hostile takeovers of U.S. public companies 4. Essential ‘legal procedures’ in U.S. public-company M&A 5. Exceptions to shareholder vote requirements (i.e., circumstances where a general meeting is not legally mandated) 6. Dual regulation: Federal securities laws (SEC rules) and state corporate law 7. Simplified overview of the U.S. public-company M&A process 8. Key considerations for cross-border acquisitions of U.S. public companies by international buyers 9. Summary of the core framework for U.S. public-company M&A (key takeaways) I. Mergers (‘Merger’) Dominate U.S. Public-Company M&A As noted earlier, three principal paths exist for corporate combinations: merger (‘merger’), share acquisition (‘share acquisition’), and asset purchase (‘asset purchase’). So why do mergers predominate in U.S. public-company M&A? Because public companies have too many, too widely dispersed shareholders. Negotiating individually with each shareholder is virtually impossible; therefore, the most practical acquisition method is: For the buyer and target to jointly execute a ‘merger agreement,’ subject to a unified shareholder vote. This is precisely what is meant by ‘merger.’ Typically, after a buyer identifies a U.S. public company as a target, the first step is not a public announcement—but rather, confidential outreach to senior management or the board of directors of the target company. If the target’s board is willing to engage, this is what we commonly call a ‘friendly deal.’ If the board refuses to cooperate, it is termed a ‘hostile takeover.’ These two approaches operate under entirely distinct U.S. procedures—like parallel tracks in separate universes. II. Friendly Mergers: The ‘Standard Pathway’ Where Both Sides Negotiate and Agree on Terms ‘Friendly’ does not mean exchanging pleasantries over tea—it means the target company’s board of directors is willing to cooperate in advancing the transaction.

Bank of America Corp Acquires 433,139 Shares of Kronos Worldwide Inc

Sep 30, 2026

Bank of America Corp acquired 433,139 shares of specialty chemicals firm Kronos Worldwide Inc worth approximately $2.74 million in Q2. Despite mixed analyst ratings, Kronos reported quarterly revenues and EPS that exceeded expectations.

MarketBeat

2026-05-04

Kronos Worldwide (NYSE:KRO) Stock Price Down 7.2%

2026-05-18

Director Michael Shawn Simmons Granted 5,550 KRO Shares as Equity Award

2026-06-05

Why Is Kronos Worldwide (KRO) Down 2.7% Since Last Earnings Report?

2026-06-16

Kronos Worldwide Inc (KRO) Financial Health: Profitability & Balance Sheet Analysis

2026-06-18

Kronos Worldwide Inc (KRO) Revenue Breakdown: Business Segments, Regional Revenue & Profit Contribution