Why are North Carolina's top officials criticizing the EPA-Chemours PFAS settlement?

North Carolina's Governor, Attorney General, and Secretary of Environmental Quality are heavily criticizing the proposed $450 million settlement between the EPA and Chemours because they claim it was negotiated 'behind our backs,' does little to address decades of PFAS contamination damage in the state, and prioritizes Chemours' interests over the health and safety of North Carolina residents.

What specific shortcomings did North Carolina officials identify in the EPA-Chemours settlement?

The officials highlighted that the settlement fails to include meaningful state input, provides inadequate drinking water relief for affected North Carolina communities, and does not ensure that pollution reduction efforts are focused within the state.

Chemours, EPA 'behind our backs' deal heavily criticized in North Carolina

Aug 2, 2026

North Carolina officials criticize a $450 million EPA-Chemours PFAS settlement, claiming it excludes state input and inadequately addresses local damage. They urge the federal government to withdraw the deal to prioritize resident safety.

The Black Chronicle

Chemours, EPA 'Behind Our Backs' Deal Heavily Criticized in North Carolina

The Black Chronicle

2026-04-17

Chemours' Fayetteville Works Earns Gold-Level WHC Conservation Certification for Environmental Excellence

2026-04-18

Chemours Company Receives Average 'Hold' Recommendation from Brokerages

2026-04-21

Chemours' West Virginia Forest Partnership Delivers Measurable Climate and Community Impact After Five Years

2026-04-21

Chemours to Release Q1 2026 Results May 5, Host Webcast