The Third World War of 2026: Hungary's General Election

Vance emphasized: 'Unlike certain leaders in Brussels, I will not threaten you, nor will I say we’ll withhold funds that you are legally entitled to receive. Hungary’s future is for you to decide—just as my fellow Americans will decide America’s future.' This is a blatant attempt to sow discord among EU member states. How many countries and regions has the U.S. threatened? Denmark, Canada, Spain, the EU itself—and its member states—not to mention Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, and others dismissed by so-called 'civilized' elites. Even more absurdly, Vance intervened directly in Hungary’s domestic election while declaring: 'What has occurred during this electoral campaign is one of the worst examples of foreign electoral interference I have ever seen—or read about.' 'One reason we’re here… is because we believe the degree of intervention by the Brussels bureaucracy in Hungarian affairs has become truly shameful.' According to him, it is the 'unelected Brussels bureaucrats' who suppress Hungary, and the EU is an 'illegal bureaucratic institution that strips member states of their sovereignty.' If the EU is an illegal institution, then by this logic—where does the United States’ own legitimacy reside? A kind of medieval barbarism and ignorance is deeply etched into the soul of Trump’s team. At a press conference in Budapest on April 7, Vance—standing right beside Orbán and without presenting any evidence—claimed: 'We know clearly that certain forces inside Ukrainian intelligence are attempting to interfere in the U.S. presidential election—and also in Hungary’s general election.' 'That’s just how they operate—the price you pay for dealing with certain individuals within their system.' Vance also accused Ukraine, calling Zelenskyy’s remarks threatening Orbán 'utterly disgraceful' and 'horrifying,' adding that 'it is absurd and wholly unacceptable for the head of one country to threaten the head of an allied nation,' and accusing Ukraine of 'shutting down oil pipelines and interfering in Hungary’s general election.' How dare Vance accuse Ukraine of interfering in the U.S. election and threatening Hungary’s head of government? What, then, should we call the U.S. arrest of Maduro—or the elimination of senior Iranian officials? Though such actions may thrill some, they have stripped the U.S. of any moral standing to criticize Ukraine—even if Ukraine truly committed those acts. Vance would do well to ask Zhu Bajie to urinate freely—and then look at his own reflection in that urine. Perhaps Vance might finally come to his senses; washing his face afterward would help even more. Moreover, Vance criticized Germany’s, Sweden’s, and the UK’s immigration policies as 'failures that generate social chaos.' Beyond rhetoric, Vance signed two major deals in Hungary: a $500 million purchase of U.S. crude oil—helping Hungary diversify its energy sources and stabilize prices, while also boosting Orbán’s electoral prospects—and a $700 million sale of U.S.-made HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems) to Hungary, strengthening U.S.-Hungarian military ties and bolstering Orbán’s image as a hardline opponent of Ukraine. Think about it: had Iran not struck—thereby curtailing Trump’s ambitions amid growing international isolation—how brazen would Trump’s intervention in Hungary’s election have been today? At the very least, it would rival his January posturing over Greenland. Of course, U.S. intervention is already glaringly overt—but still carries a sleazy air, precisely because of its inglorious performance vis-à-vis Iran. Double standards are barbaric thinking—no matter which country, group, or individual applies them to any subject. To say 'it depends on the circumstances' is to ignore fundamental principles; to justify exceptions is to legitimize further exceptions—including those the justifier themselves would never accept. It is impossible for 'bad actors' to bear the cost of every exception.

Hungary’s Orbán: Reporting to His Majesty, My Undercover Mission Has Concluded—I Remain at Your Command!

In the early hours of April 13, in Hungary’s parliamentary elections, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s party suffered a decisive defeat. Hungarians, finally seizing the moment of transition, ousted this 'pro-Russian' prime minister. The opposition party Tisza won by a landslide, and its leader, Péter Márki-Zay, will assume office as Hungary’s next prime minister. Hungary, Europe, and Ukraine—all have cause to celebrate. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, nearly all European countries have distanced themselves from Vladimir Putin—yet Orbán moved in the opposite direction. This phenomenon cannot be explained simply by labeling him 'pro-Russian.' As prime minister of an EU and NATO member state, Orbán—in a series of critical junctures—actively weakened Europe’s collective capacity for action through concrete, operational means, thereby indirectly creating strategic space for Russia. Orbán resembles less a mere ally and more a proxy for Putin—even a modern-day 'puppet emperor' draped in contemporary garb. 1 It all began with Orbán’s political transformation. The young Orbán was not the figure he is today. In the early 1990s, he emerged as a liberal politician, openly criticizing Soviet legacies and even demanding the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Hungary. Back then, he epitomized the 'post–Cold War generation,' believing firmly in Western institutions, market economies, and European integration. But after entering the 21st century—and especially following his return to power in 2010—Orbán underwent a profound 'political turn.' He began criticizing liberal democracy and introduced the concept of 'illiberal democracy,' emphasizing national sovereignty, cultural identity, and strongman governance. This discourse resonated uncannily with the political narrative Vladimir Putin constructed in Russia. This resonance first manifested in energy policy. Hungary is highly dependent on imported energy, and Russia ranks among Europe’s largest natural gas suppliers. Shortly after Orbán’s government took office, it swiftly concluded a long-term natural gas supply agreement with Russia. Price, payment mechanisms, and supply reliability became central points of negotiation. Even more crucial was nuclear cooperation. In 2014, Hungary signed an agreement with Russia for Rosatom—the Russian state nuclear energy corporation—to build the Paks II nuclear power plant expansion. Valued at €12 billion, most of the funding came from Russian loans. In other words, Hungary’s dependence on Russia extended beyond diplomacy and energy—it now ran deep into infrastructure and finance. This meant Orbán’s 'pro-Russian' stance was no longer merely rhetorical; it had been embedded into Hungary’s economic structure. A rupture in relations would carry an extremely high cost. 2 After binding himself to Russia, Orbán proceeded to betray his allies. EU decision-making on foreign and security policy typically requires unanimity among member states—a mechanism originally designed to protect smaller nations, yet repeatedly exploited by Orbán in practice. On sanctions against Russia, he repeatedly delayed decisions, attached conditions, or even threatened vetoes—forcing the EU to revise its proposals. For instance, during multiple rounds of negotiations on anti-Russian sanctions, Hungary insisted on exempting Russian oil pipeline transport from restrictions. During discussions on financial sanctions, Orbán also raised objections to proposed restrictions on certain Russian banks.

Hungary Files US Nuclear Agreement to Anchor Post-Orban Ties

5 days ago

Hungary filed a US nuclear energy agreement favoring American designs like small modular reactors to strengthen ties after Viktor Orban's ouster. The framework includes potential financing and Westinghouse fuel supply, aiming to reduce reliance on Russian cooperation.

bloomberg

Hungary Files US Nuclear Agreement to Anchor Post-Orban Ties

FAQ