The Waste Plastic Recycling Industry: Closing the 14th Five-Year Plan and Launching the 15th Five-Year Plan—Challenges and Opportunities

Product structure upgrading is the third step in response—leveraging technological advancement to apply recycled HDPE in high-value-added fields such as automotive lightweighting and green construction. Baolüte, through nanoscale modification technology, has increased the impact resistance of recycled HDPE by 40%, bringing its performance close to that of virgin material. In food packaging, recycled HDPE granules are subject to strict controls on VOCs (≤50 mg/kg), microorganisms (total colony count ≤100 CFU/g), and heavy metals (combined total ≤50 ppm), meeting the sustainability-material requirements of premium brands. International expansion is the fourth step—entering new markets overseas. In March 2025, Baolüte’s HDPE export volume surged 83.46% month-on-month to 62,400 tons, setting a new record. This growth stems primarily from robust demand for high-quality recycled HDPE in Southeast Asian markets, as well as the company’s successful entry into these markets via its technological edge. Moreover, China–U.S. tariff policies underwent a historic adjustment in May 2025, with both sides significantly reducing "reciprocal" tariffs under the "Joint Statement of the Geneva Economic and Trade Talks", creating favorable conditions for recycled plastic exports. Refined operations constitute the fifth step—enhancing operational efficiency to reduce fixed costs. For instance, the Miluo Municipal Government’s “Guidance and Incentive Measures for Upgrading the Recycled Plastic Industry” offers newly入驻 enterprises in the designated upgrading zone of the Recycled Plastic Industrial Park a “three-year tax exemption followed by a 50% reduction for two years”, plus rent subsidies and equipment support grants. These preferential policies present valuable opportunities for enterprises to lower operating costs. IV. Opportunities and Challenges Facing Waste Plastic Recycling Enterprises Going Global Amid intensifying domestic market competition and evolving policy environments, going global has become a strategic priority for waste plastic recycling enterprises. Southeast Asia serves as the first destination: demand for recycled plastics is rising notably in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia. However, Vietnam will comprehensively ban waste plastic imports starting in 2025, permitting only high-purity (99.5%) recyclable plastics imported by certified recycling facilities. Thailand, meanwhile, will prohibit all plastic waste imports effective January 1, 2025—allowing imports only by factories located in duty-free zones, within their production capacity limits, and only upon proof of insufficient local supply. Such policy shifts pose challenges for enterprises reliant on imported feedstock, yet simultaneously create opportunities for technologically advanced players. The EU represents the second destination. Though challenged by the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), demand for recycled plastics there is growing substantially under regulatory drivers. The EU’s Single-Use Plastics Directive mandates that PET beverage bottles contain no less than 25% recycled content by 2025 and at least 30% by 2030. The UK implemented its Plastic Packaging Tax (General) Regulations on April 1, 2022, imposing a £200-per-ton tax on plastic packaging containing less than 30% recycled content. France’s Anti-Waste Law stipulates that all plastic products must contain ≥50% recycled material by 2025. These policies guarantee stable market demand for recycled plastics but also impose higher environmental and quality standards. The Middle East constitutes the third destination, where procurement demand and environmental standards for recycled plastics are evolving in countries including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Is Action Underway? The EU ‘Provokes’ China—Starting with Plastics

Starting next week, the EU will impose provisional tariffs of 6.6% to 24.2% on imported polyethylene terephthalate (PET)—a material widely used in plastic bottle production. This measure follows an investigation launched by the EU in March, which alleges that PET products imported from China have “flooded Europe”, causing European producers to cut prices and suffer “imminent injury”. Customs data show that China’s non-cellular PET exports to the EU surged 43.7% year-on-year in the first ten months of this year, reaching USD 114 million. Clearly, the EU’s justification is untenable—in fact, it reflects trade protectionism. After all, PET production capacity in Europe is limited, and wartime-related cost pressures inevitably make European production more expensive than China’s. This episode also reveals increasingly hostile voices within the EU. For example, former EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht claimed that after years of trade with China, the EU has “lost out”—citing widening trade deficits and asserting that “all the money flows to China.” Notably, De Gucht was the same official who launched anti-subsidy investigations against China’s solar photovoltaic industry back in 2013. Some politicians even argue that, although the EU’s economy is recovering, weak domestic consumption has led Chinese consumers to buy more Chinese-made goods—and fewer EU products—deeming this “unfair.” It is evident that numerous EU figures now seek confrontation with China—a trend underscored by the recent high-profile investigation into electric vehicles (EVs). The rationale is identical: surging EV purchases from China have left EU manufacturers unable to sell their own products, prompting scrutiny into potential dumping. Ironically, this appears to serve U.S. interests: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has long claimed China’s EV overcapacity, while U.S. sales of EVs remain strong. Reports indicate that the President of the China-EU Chamber of Commerce believes China possesses the capacity to produce 50 million vehicles annually—yet domestic demand stands at only 23 million.

Mixed reactions to UK’s proposed 65% out-of-quota PET safeguard duty

1 day ago

The UK Trade Remedies Authority proposed a 65% duty on PET and rPET imports exceeding quarterly quotas, sparking shock among buyers and producers. Market participants anticipate reduced deep-sea imports and potential use of bonded warehouses to manage tariff risks.

icis

2026-10-30

Mixed reactions to UK’s proposed 65% out-of-quota PET safeguard duty

Mixed reactions to UK’s proposed 65% out-of-quota PET safeguard duty

FAQ