What specific oilfields are at the center of Norway's Supreme Court climate case, and what is their current operational status?

The case concerns Equinor's Breidablikk and Aker BP's Tyrving and Yggdrasil fields. According to the news, Breidablikk and Tyrving are already in production, while Yggdrasil is due to come on stream next year.

Why did lower courts rule that the three oilfield development permits were invalid, and what key climate-related consideration did they find missing?

Two lower courts ruled in favour of Greenpeace and Young Friends of the Earth, finding that Norway failed to properly assess the environmental impact from the three fields — specifically, the government failed to consider the climate impact of burning the oil and gas produced (known as Scope 3 emissions), and that later efforts to rectify this omission were deemed invalid.

Norway asks supreme court to overturn environmental verdict against oilfields

2026-05-06

Norwegian Government Criticized Over Decision to Reopen North Sea Gasfields

2026-07-01

Norway offshore workers, employers enter mediation to avert strike

2026-07-02

Norway's unions agree wage deal to avert strike at offshore installations

2026-08-23

Norway asks supreme court to overturn environmental verdict against oilfields

2026-09-16

Equinor plans LNG expansion in early 2030s to meet European and Asian demand

Norway asks supreme court to overturn environmental verdict against oilfields

FAQ