Axios: The U.S. military has been ordered to prepare for a possible strike against Iran; Trump is weighing the timing.

The Pentagon instructed U.S. Central Command several days ago to complete preparations for resuming major combat operations against Iran, according to U.S. officials. Significance: The directive does not specify a concrete launch date for strikes, nor has President Trump made any final decision. However, U.S. and Israeli sources say such action could occur before the U.S. midterm elections—or possibly even before Israel’s election, which takes place one week earlier. Broader context: Resuming major combat operations would likely involve large-scale bombing of Iranian energy facilities, infrastructure, and nuclear targets, sources say. Resuming hostilities within the next three to four weeks could affect the midterm elections—partly because oil prices may rise as a result. A Pentagon official told Axios: “The Department of Defense’s job is to develop and present military options to the president.” A White House official said Trump retains all options at his disposal. The official added: “The United States is currently in an extremely advantageous position—controlling the Strait of Hormuz while Iran’s economy collapses. Iran has already been severely weakened; events can now go only one of two ways: the easy way or the hard way. President Trump holds all the cards and will do what is best for America.” Earlier on Wednesday, The Atlantic reported that Trump is considering striking Iran before the midterm elections. Latest developments: On Friday, Trump’s national security team met for several hours at Camp David to discuss war and other issues. An Israeli official told Axios that part of the meeting focused on the possible resumption of major combat operations against Iran. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated after the meeting that discussions centered on “long-term” foreign policy planning. U.S.-Iran negotiations have made no progress. Qatari mediators are still awaiting Iran’s response to the U.S. counterproposal—which includes demands for nuclear concessions. A second Israeli official said: “Discussions about potentially resuming major combat operations against Iran have increased. The likelihood of such action occurring before the elections is low—but we’re not ruling it out. After the midterms, the probability rises significantly.” Behind the scenes: President Trump spoke by phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday—their second call in several days, following weeks of virtually no contact. A U.S. official said Trump and Netanyahu discussed “commemorating and honoring the victims of the October 7 massacre.” A first Israeli official said the call occurred shortly after Netanyahu held a meeting with his national security team on Iran-related matters. Netanyahu spoke with Rubio on Monday. If major combat operations resume, the most likely scenario would involve coordinated U.S.-Israeli action, with Israeli forces participating. Two Israeli officials said the Iranian regime is desperate and paranoid—a state that could prompt it to launch a preemptive strike. They noted that Iran has already suffered two surprise attacks and does not wish to endure a third. Subtext: Resuming war—or even escalating tension or emergency conditions—could also impact Israel’s election, as Iran might retaliate by launching hundreds of ballistic missiles at the country. Such escalation—or even heightened tension—could politically benefit Netanyahu by discouraging his opponents from attacking him during the final stretch of the campaign.

Does the U.S. military’s recent buildup indicate another imminent military move against Iran?

Since September 2026, U.S. military deployments around Iran have accelerated markedly—reaching scales well beyond conventional deterrence. First, troop reinforcements: the Roosevelt carrier strike group quietly departed San Diego on September 27 and is expected to enter the Middle East by late October; simultaneously, the Makin Island amphibious ready group—carrying roughly 2,000 Marines—also set sail. Together, these two deployments add 9,000–10,000 personnel. Second, force concentration: the U.S. already has two aircraft carriers—the Bush and Washington—in the region, along with the Boxer amphibious ready group, totaling over 50,000 troops. If the Roosevelt arrives while the Washington remains deployed, the U.S. would field a rare three-carrier formation—capable of launching more than 150 carrier-based aircraft and supported by multiple escort vessels, enabling saturation strikes; the amphibious groups further provide options for island seizure or amphibious landings. Third, deployment adjustments: the Pentagon has quietly extended the deployment periods of some U.S. forces stationed in the Middle East. On October 7, U.S. officials disclosed that the Pentagon had instructed Central Command several days earlier to finalize preparations for resuming large-scale combat operations against Iran—awaiting only Trump’s final decision. By current force posture, the U.S. military has completed multi-phase, high-intensity strike contingency plans. In July 2026, the U.S. conducted airstrikes against southern Iranian coastal targets—including anti-ship missile sites and air defense radars—at over 80 locations; the intensity was four to five times greater than previous operations that month. Today’s force levels far exceed those seen in comparable operations back then. Does dispatching forces across half the globe serve merely as armed theater—and nothing more? Trump has been unusually voluble lately—alternately issuing tough threats of war and soft talk of diplomacy. His seemingly contradictory statements stem entirely from electoral calculations. Trump’s recent oscillations on Iran reflect a strategic operation deeply tethered to midterm election interests. On October 7, multiple U.S. officials revealed the Pentagon had issued its readiness directive—and reports even surfaced suggesting the U.S. might restart large-scale military operations against Iran before Israel’s election on October 27 or the U.S. midterm elections on November 3, targeting Iranian energy infrastructure, critical facilities, and nuclear sites. Yet just one day later, Trump posted on social media that U.S.-Iran talks were “productive” and that the U.S. would not attack Iran before the midterms. This whiplash rhetoric serves purely electoral ends: per a recent CNN poll, only 26% of voters approve of Trump’s Iran policy, while 69% disapprove—and the Republican Party faces serious risk of losing control of both chambers of Congress. Launching a strike now could trigger a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and a sharp spike in oil prices—further fueling domestic inflation and directly damaging Trump’s electoral prospects. Yet Trump hasn’t fully abandoned pre-election action. His statements embody a strategy of “extreme ambiguity”: on one hand, he signals de-escalation to stabilize oil prices and reassure voters; on the other, he preserves military options—ready to execute a brief, populist-style strike against Iran if his electoral outlook turns dire. After all, the U.S.-Iran dynamic of alternating talks and limited strikes has become routine: since early 2026, multiple rounds of cross-border strikes and missile reprisals have already occurred, repeatedly diluting the political cost of low-intensity military action.

Trump Prepares for Iran Escalation After US, Israeli Elections

1 day ago

Escalating tensions between the US, Israel, and Iran ahead of elections threaten further conflict, disrupting energy flows and driving Brent crude prices up over 80%. Rising oil and gasoline costs are significantly impacting US economic conditions and political landscapes.

bloomberg

2026-01-05

US to Send Oil Companies to Fix Venezuela's Infrastructure, Boost Output: Trump

2026-02-23

Chemicals mostly spared under new Trump tariff plan

2026-03-10

Oil prices tumble after Trump says Iran war may be nearing end

2026-03-10

Markets Rally, Commodity Prices Fall as Trump Predicts Short Conflict

2026-03-10

Trump Signals Ceasefire, Global Oil Prices Plummet