China's bio-jet fuel has received global RSB sustainability certification for the first time—what other information is worth noting?

To address the above three major challenges, the following measures are required: (1) Breaking the current 'fuel–engine' bundled certification model and establishing a scalable fuel certification standard centered on safety; (2) Developing targeted engine certification platforms capable of measuring required parameters while ensuring full-engine matching and coupling; and (3) Building dedicated aviation engine and supporting platforms for alternative fuel certification to reduce dependence on foreign equipment manufacturers. Additionally, promoting interoperability between China’s airworthiness and sustainability certification systems and international certification frameworks will help streamline certification procedures and shorten timelines—facilitating both the 'going global' and 'bringing in' of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF). (2) Accelerating technological breakthroughs in the 'green carbon + green hydrogen' Power-to-Liquid (PtL) pathway Even if all oil consumption were eliminated, the saved bio-oil feedstock would meet only 50% of aviation industry demand. China’s waste cooking oil (‘gutter oil’) collection system remains underdeveloped, with a mere 5.6% recovery rate—just one-seventh that of the United States. Moreover, due to dietary differences, China’s waste cooking oil contains high levels of solid impurities, moisture, and severe acidic degradation, resulting in high pretreatment costs. Collection of agricultural, forestry, and municipal solid wastes is difficult, leading to unstable supply and poor quality; although sugar- and starch-based feedstocks are abundant in volume, their use raises concerns about competing with food supply ('food vs. fuel') and arable land use ('fuel vs. food'). In contrast, the PtL pathway can fully leverage China’s advantages in new-energy power infrastructure construction and equipment manufacturing. Theoretically, PtL requires only hydrogen and CO₂ as raw materials: hydrogen can be produced via electrolysis of seawater using renewable electricity—ensuring broad, bottleneck-free feedstock availability. Compared with conventional jet fuel, PtL-derived SAF achieves up to 99–100% lifecycle emissions reduction—the highest among all current technical pathways. However, the core challenge lies in the upstream processes—air-captured CO₂ and green hydrogen production—which drive high SAF production costs and hinder cost reduction. With advances in production technologies and equipment, this pathway is expected to enable large-scale SAF commercialization. In 2022, Johnson Matthey announced HyCOgen™, an innovative reverse water-gas shift technology designed to convert captured CO₂ and green H₂ into SAF. By integrating HyCOgen™ with FTCANS Fischer–Tropsch synthesis technology (co-developed with BP), an integrated, scalable solution for efficient and economically viable renewable SAF production is enabled—deployable across project scales, from small installations powered by a single electrolyzer to world-class facilities utilizing multiple large-scale electrolyzer modules. (3) Diversifying SAF feedstock supply and aligning it with eco-friendly resource recycling SAF feedstock sourcing must be region-specific and diversified through multiple channels: waste cooking oil in Sichuan and Chongqing; waste gases, green electricity, and green hydrogen in the northwestern deserts; agricultural and forestry residues in Northeast China and Xinjiang; and giant reed (Arundo donax) in Hubei and Hunan provinces.

Annual sales volume and outlook for the conductive carbon additive market

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry 1.1 Industry Overview 1.1.1 Definition and Characteristics of Conductive Carbon Additives 1.1.2 Types of Conductive Carbon Additives 1.1.3 Applications of Conductive Carbon Additives 1.2 Market Size of China’s Conductive Carbon Additives Industry (2020–2025) 1.3 Comprehensive Review of Domestic and International Conductive Carbon Additives Industry Development 1.3.1 Industry Development History 1.3.2 Industry Drivers 1.3.3 Industrial Chain Structure Analysis 1.3.4 Technological Development Status 1.3.5 Industry M&A Activities Chapter 2 Industrial Competitive Landscape Analysis 2.1 Industrial Competitive Structure Analysis 2.1.1 Competition Among Existing Firms 2.1.2 Analysis of Potential Entrants 2.1.3 Threat of Substitutes 2.1.4 Supplier Bargaining Power 2.1.5 Buyer Bargaining Power 2.2 Industry Concentration Analysis 2.2.1 Market Concentration Analysis 2.2.2 Regional Concentration Analysis 2.3 Ecological Layouts of Key Domestic and International Enterprises in the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry 2.3.1 Current Competitive Landscape 2.3.2 Industry Distribution Chapter 3 Analysis of China’s Conductive Carbon Additives Industry Import and Export Situation 3.1 Export Situation Analysis 3.2 Import Situation Analysis 3.3 Factors Affecting Imports and Exports 3.3.1 Impact of Trade Frictions 3.3.2 Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic 3.3.3 Impact of the Russia–Ukraine Conflict 3.4 Challenges and Countermeasures Facing Imports and Exports Chapter 4 Analysis of Conductive Carbon Additives Industry Development in Key Chinese Regions 4.1 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in North China (2020–2025) 4.1.1 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in North China (2020–2025) 4.1.2 Interpretation of Major Policies in North China (2020–2025) 4.2 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in Central China (2020–2025) 4.2.1 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in Central China (2020–2025) 4.2.2 Interpretation of Major Policies in Central China (2020–2025) 4.3 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in South China (2020–2025) 4.3.1 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in South China (2020–2025) 4.3.2 Interpretation of Major Policies in South China (2020–2025) 4.4 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in East China (2020–2025) 4.4.1 Development Status of the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry in East China (2020–2025) 4.4.2 Interpretation of Major Policies in East China (2020–2025) Chapter 5 Operational Analysis of China’s Conductive Carbon Additives Subtype Markets (2020–2025) 5.1 Product Classification Standards for the Conductive Carbon Additives Industry

Gevo strengthens carbon revenue stream with new multi-year carbon removal agreement

3 days ago

Gevo secured a multi-year carbon removal credit supply agreement via CEEZER using its North Dakota BECCS ethanol facility, expecting the carbon segment to contribute over $50 million by 2026.

Biofuels International Magazine

2026-06-09

SM Energy, Gevo, and Transocean Shares Plummet, What You Need To Know

2026-06-15

Two Reasons to Like GEVO (and One Not So Much)

2026-06-26

Gevo, Inc. Actuals & Estimates (NASDAQ: GEVO)

2026-07-25

Gevo Inc Stock Price Drops 0.205% to $1.625

2026-07-27

Gevo Inc Releases Detailed Cash Flow Statements