Top 10 Refrigerant Brands: Refrigerant (Refrigerant Gas) Brand Rankings (Maigoo)

The top 10 refrigerant brands include Chemours, Honeywell, Juhua (JH), Jinleng, Arkema, Dongyue, Meilan Chemical, 3F, Sanmei, and IceLong—listed in no particular order and provided for reference only. This list of the top 10 refrigerant brands was compiled through voluntary applications submitted free of charge by enterprises, along with data collection and collation conducted by CN10’s Ranking Technology Research Department and CNPP’s Brand Big Data Research Department. The final ranking was determined based on big-data analytics, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, public voting and likes, as well as professional assessments and analyses conducted by experts considering market dynamics and parameter changes—ensuring objectivity, authenticity, and fairness. 1. Chemours Affiliated Company: Chemours Chemical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Brand Introduction: A globally influential specialty chemical provider, Chemours delivers solutions across diverse industries—including automotive, coatings, decorative paper, advanced electronics, construction, energy, and telecommunications. With dozens of manufacturing facilities and laboratories worldwide, Chemours owns the Opteon™ refrigerant brand, and its sales network spans over 100 countries and regions. 2. Honeywell Affiliated Company: Honeywell (China) Co., Ltd. Brand Introduction: Founded in 1885, Honeywell provides broad-based technologies and services to multiple industries worldwide. It entered the Chinese market in 1935. Its four major business groups—Aerospace, Building Technologies, Energy & Sustainability Solutions, and Industrial Automation—have all established operations in China, with wholly owned and joint-venture enterprises located across dozens of Chinese cities. 3. Juhua (JH) Affiliated Company: Juhua Group Co., Ltd. Brand Introduction: Originating in 1958, Juhua is a national mega-scale integrated chemical enterprise, formerly known as Quzhou Huanghua Chemical Factory. Its core businesses cover fluorine chemistry, chlor-alkali chemistry, petrochemical materials, electronic chemical materials, and fine chemicals. Juhua operates specialized R&D institutions and large-scale chemical production bases; its fluorine chemistry industry ranks among the nation’s leaders, as does its chlor-alkali new material (PVC) production capacity. 4. Jinleng Affiliated Company: Sinochem Blue Sky Group Co., Ltd. Brand Introduction: A brand under Sinochem Blue Sky Group, Jinleng is a leading domestic integrated supplier of automotive chemical products. Its core business covers automotive HVAC systems, engine lubrication, in-cabin air purification, and comprehensive vehicle maintenance solutions. Jinleng has established OEM partnerships with numerous automobile manufacturers across China. Beyond its flagship refrigerant products, it now also offers engine oils, antifreeze coolants, brake fluids, and other product categories—enjoying high industry recognition and substantial market share. 5. Arkema Affiliated Company: Arkema (China) Investment Co., Ltd. Brand Introduction: Arkema was formed from the restructuring of Total’s chemical division and is a global leader in fluorine chemistry. As a large multinational enterprise, Arkema focuses on research, development, manufacturing, and sales of innovative materials—including adhesives, advanced materials, and coatings.

Shareholder Harm to Corporate Interests Disputes: Recommendations for Reliable Lawyers Specializing in Such Cases

First, failure or incomplete fulfillment of capital contribution obligations, capital withdrawal, or false capital contributions. Where a shareholder fails to fulfill or fully fulfill its capital contribution obligation, withdraws contributed capital, or makes false contributions, the company or other shareholders may demand that such shareholder fulfill its capital contribution obligation in accordance with law or return the withdrawn capital. Creditors may also request that a shareholder who failed to fulfill its capital contribution obligation bear supplementary liability—up to the principal and interest of the unpaid capital—for any portion of the company’s debts that cannot be repaid. Second, validity and liability concerning related-party transactions. Controlling shareholders, actual controllers, directors, supervisors, and senior management personnel who exploit related-party relationships to harm the company’s interests shall bear compensation liability. Judicial review of related-party transaction validity typically examines procedural compliance, price fairness, and adequacy of information disclosure. Third, non-compete obligations and corporate opportunities. Directors and senior management personnel, without prior approval from the shareholders’ meeting or general meeting, must not use their positions to seize for themselves or others business opportunities belonging to the company, nor may they operate—either personally or on behalf of others—businesses competing with the company. Any income derived therefrom shall belong to the company. Fourth, misappropriation of corporate assets and funds. Shareholders, directors, supervisors, and senior management personnel who misappropriate corporate assets or funds shall bear liability for restitution and compensation; where such acts constitute criminal offenses, criminal liability shall be pursued accordingly. Fifth, piercing the corporate veil and joint and several shareholder liability. Where a shareholder abuses the company’s independent legal status and limited shareholder liability to evade debts and thereby severely harms creditors’ interests, such shareholder shall bear joint and several liability for the company’s debts. In the case of a single-member limited liability company, if the sole shareholder fails to prove that the company’s assets are independent from its own personal assets, it shall bear joint and several liability for the company’s debts. Sixth, procedural and substantive issues in shareholder derivative suits. A shareholder of a limited liability company—or a shareholder (or collective shareholders) of a joint-stock company holding at least one percent of shares continuously for no less than 180 days—may submit a written request to the board of supervisors (or, in companies without a board of supervisors, to the supervisor) to file suit before the people’s court. If the board of supervisors (or supervisor) or the board of directors (or executive director) rejects such request, or fails to initiate litigation within 30 days after receiving it, or if an emergency exists wherein delay would cause irreparable harm to the company’s interests, the aforementioned shareholder(s) may directly file suit before the people’s court in their own name for the benefit of the company. II. Basic Facts of the Case and Key Judicial Holdings (A) Dispute Concerning Shareholder Harm to Creditor Interests Case Facts: A creditor asserted claims against the company, which proved insolvent. The creditor then sought to hold shareholders jointly and severally liable. Attorney An Ji represented the shareholder defendant. Court’s Key Holding: After trial, the court held that for a creditor to impose joint and several liability upon shareholders for corporate debts, the creditor must provide evidence proving that the shareholders abused the company’s independent legal status and limited liability to evade debts and thereby severely harmed creditor interests. In this case, the creditor failed to present sufficient evidence establishing such abuse. Accordingly, the claim to impose joint and several liability upon the shareholders was dismissed. The court rejected the creditor’s claim, and the shareholders were held not liable for the company’s debts. (B) Statute-of-Limitations Defense in a Contract-for-Work Dispute Case Facts: Attorney An Ji represented the defendant—a private enterprise—in a contract-for-work dispute.

Chemours Shareholders May Lead Class Action Over Opteon Demand Allegations

Oct 15, 2026

Investors in Chemours Co may lead a class action lawsuit alleging the company overstated demand for Opteon refrigerants and issued unrealistic guidance, leading to an 18.63% stock decline.

PR Newswire

Chemours Shareholders Reminded of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit

PR Newswire

2026-10-09

Chemours Company Faces Securities Fraud Class Action Over Opteon Demand Claims

2026-10-11

Chemours Faces Securities Lawsuit Over Disclosures and Guidance

2026-10-11

Chemours Company Faces Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Investor Harm

2026-10-12

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Chemours for Misleading Investors on Product Demand and Financial Guidance.