Why are North Carolina's Governor and Attorney General opposing the EPA's settlement with Chemours?

Governor Josh Stein and Attorney General Jeff Jackson oppose the EPA's proposed settlement with Chemours because it was reached without consulting North Carolina officials and disproportionately benefits West Virginia while leaving North Carolina with minimal resources despite being significantly affected by GenX contamination; they assert the agreement fails to adequately address the extensive environmental damage caused by Chemours in North Carolina and confirm the state will continue pursuing litigation against the company.

What specific environmental issue in North Carolina is central to the dispute over the EPA-Chemours settlement?

The central environmental issue is GenX contamination — a type of PFAS pollution linked to Chemours' operations — which has significantly affected North Carolina, yet the EPA's proposed settlement allocates minimal resources to the state while favoring West Virginia, prompting strong criticism from state leaders who emphasize the inadequacy of the deal in addressing the local environmental damage.

Governor, AG denounce EPA's Chemours settlement

Jul 1, 2026

North Carolina officials criticize an EPA-Chemours PFAS settlement as favoring West Virginia, leaving NC with minimal resources despite significant GenX damage, and vow to continue litigation.

The State Port Pilot

2026-06-05

Attorney General Jeff Jackson Defends Antitrust Enforcement in Chemours Case

2026-06-24

North Carolina leaders say federal Chemours deal fails Cape Fear region

2026-06-25

Chemours Looks to Settle Federal PFAS Case for $450 Million; NC Not at Table

2026-07-01

Governor, AG denounce EPA's Chemours settlement

2026-07-03

$450M Chemours PFAS Deal Faces Criticism In NC