Why are Lloyd's and Arch Insurance seeking to avoid paying Nord Stream's $684 million claim for the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline blasts?

Lloyd's and Arch Insurance argue that Nord Stream's insurance policy explicitly excludes coverage for damage caused by war or under the order of any government, and they contend the September 2022 explosions were a direct result of Russia's invasion of Ukraine — either carried out by state actors (from Ukraine, Russia, or the U.S.) or by sub-state actors from Ukraine with state support — thus falling under the war exclusion clause.

What is the central factual dispute between Nord Stream and the insurers in the London High Court trial?

The central dispute is whether the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline explosions were linked to the Ukraine war or ordered by a state — which would trigger the policy’s war exclusion — or whether, as Nord Stream claims, no government has been proven responsible and Ukraine has repeatedly denied involvement, leaving insufficient evidence to justify denying the claim under the exclusion.

Nord Stream Blasts Due to War, Say Insurers Seeking to Avoid Payout

Apr 16, 2026

Insurers Lloyd's and Arch argue the 2022 Nord Stream explosions were war-related to deny a €580 million claim. The London High Court trial will decide if geopolitical conflict exempts them from paying damages for ruptured gas supplies to Europe.

reuters

2026-04-16

Nord Stream Blasts Due to War, Say Insurers Seeking to Avoid Payout

2026-04-17

Nornickel Says Higher Prices Offset Increased Costs, Delivery Times from Iran War

Nord Stream Blasts Due to War, Say Insurers Seeking to Avoid Payout

FAQ