Why are North Carolina leaders opposing the EPA-Chemours PFAS settlement?

North Carolina state officials — including Governor Josh Stein, Attorney General Jeff Jackson, and DEQ Secretary Reid Wilson — oppose the proposed PFAS deal between the EPA and Chemours Co because it was negotiated without the state's involvement, fails to adequately address the extensive PFAS contamination caused by Chemours, and provides no meaningful benefits or financial relief to North Carolina.

What actions are North Carolina officials taking in response to the EPA-Chemours PFAS deal?

State leaders are urging a federal court to reject the settlement and are pursuing separate lawsuits against chemical manufacturers to hold them accountable for PFAS contamination.

NC Leaders Push Back on EPA-Chemours PFAS Deal

Jul 30, 2026

North Carolina officials oppose a proposed EPA-Chemours PFAS settlement, citing lack of state involvement and inadequate contamination remedies. They are urging a federal court to reject the deal while pursuing separate lawsuits against chemical manufacturers.

WECT

2026-07-30

NC Leaders Push Back on EPA-Chemours PFAS Deal

2026-07-30

NC Leaders Urge Court to Reject EPA’s PFAS Deal with Chemours

2026-07-31

State leaders urge court to reject EPA-Chemours PFAS settlement

2026-08-12

Gov. Stein, AG Jackson oppose Chemours, EPA 'deal'

2026-09-11

North Carolina secures $455 million PFAS settlement, plus $135 million cleanup reserve

NC Leaders Push Back on EPA-Chemours PFAS Deal

FAQ