-
Categories
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
-
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
-
Food Additives
- Industrial Coatings
- Agrochemicals
- Dyes and Pigments
- Surfactant
- Flavors and Fragrances
- Chemical Reagents
- Catalyst and Auxiliary
- Natural Products
- Inorganic Chemistry
-
Organic Chemistry
-
Biochemical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Ingredient
-
Pharmaceutical Intermediates
Promotion
ECHEMI Mall
Wholesale
Weekly Price
Exhibition
News
-
Trade Service
5.
2.
5.
7 Selection of analysis conditions
(1) Selection of solid phase extraction column
In the study of this method, OasisHLB solid phase extraction column, BUNDELUT C 18 solid phase extraction column, ENVI-18 solid phase extraction column, Octadecyl C 18 solid phase extraction column, LiChrolutEN solid phase extraction column and Sep-Pak C 18 solid phase extraction column were used.
The extraction efficiency and purification effect of five cephalosporins were compared with six solid phase extraction columns
.
Experiments have found that the Sep-Pak C18 solid phase extraction column has a low recovery rate (only 50% to 60%) and the purification effect is not ideal.
(2) Selection of extraction solution
In the study of this method, according to the characteristics of the honey sample and the nature of the test substance, the sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer solution was determined as the extracting solution
.
Through the recovery rate experiment, the effects of the concentration and pH value of the sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer solution in the extract on the recovery rate of 5 cephalosporins were compared.
Table 5-37 The effect of extract concentration on the recovery rate (%) of 5 cephalosporins
Table 5-38 The effect of extract pH on the recovery rate (%) of 5 cephalosporins
It can be seen from Table 5-37 and Table 5-38 that when the concentration of sodium dihydrogen phosphate in the extract is 0.
15 mol/L and the pH is 8.
5, the recovery rate of the five cephalosporins is the best.
Therefore, this method uses pH 8 .
5, 0.
15 mol/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate solution as the extract
.
(3) Selection of elution conditions for solid phase extraction column
This method compares the effects of using 1 mL, 2 mL, and 3 mL acetonitrile as the eluent of the solid phase extraction column on the recovery of five cephalosporins.
The results are shown in Table 5-39
.
Experiments show that when the amount of eluent is 2mL, the recovery rate of 5 cephalosporins is 94.
Table 5-39 The effect of solid phase extraction column eluent dosage on recovery rate (%)
(4) Selection of liquid chromatography analysis column
The chromatographic behaviors of 5 cephalosporins were compared using uBondapak C 18 300mm×4.
0mm chromatographic column and ZORBAXSB-C 18 3.
5um 150mm×2.
1mm chromatographic column
.
Experiments have found that the sensitivity of these two chromatographic columns can meet the requirements, but the flow rate of the μBondapak C 18 300mm×4.
(5) Determination of mass spectrometry conditions
A syringe pump was used for direct sample injection, and the standard solutions of cefazolin , cefpirin, cephalexin, cefalonine, and cefquinoxime were injected into the ion source at 5 μL/min, and the five cephalosporins were detected by positive ion detection.
The primary mass spectrometry analysis (Q1 scan) shows that the protonated molecular ion peaks are 456, 424, 348, 459, and 529 respectively, and then the molecular ion is subjected to secondary mass spectrometry (product ion scan) to obtain fragment ion information
.
Then declustering voltage (DP), collision gas energy (CE), electrospray voltage, atomizing gas and curtain gas pressure are optimized to achieve the best molecular ion and characteristic fragment ion pair intensity