 Home > Chemicals Industry > China Chemical > Sherwin-Williams VS PPG coating technology layout comparison

Sherwin-Williams VS PPG coating technology layout comparison

 Last Update: 2021-10-10
 Source: Internet
 Author: User

Tags

fluorite chemical formula

industrial areas near

Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

【Star Enterprise of Chemical Machinery Equipment Network ] Major listed companies in the coating industry: Excalibur (002361), Wanhua Chemical (600309), Yongyue Technology (603879), Hongchang Electronics (603002), Akeli (603722), Huayi Group (600623), Honghui New Materials (002802), Adisseo (600299), Shangwei New Materials (688585), Zhejiang Jiaotong Branch (002061), Industrial Co.
, Ltd.
(603928), etc.

Star Enterprise of Chemical Machinery Equipment NetworkMajor listed companies in the chemical machinery equipment coating industry:

The core data of this article: Sherwin-Williams, PPG patent applications, patent market value, patent cooperation applications, key patent layout

The core data of this article:

Full-text statistical description: 1) Search keywords: paint and similar or related keywords; 2) Search scope: title, abstract and rights description; 3) Screening conditions: simple family application de-duplication, legal status is substantive review , Authorization, PCT international publication, PCT entry into designated countries (designated period), and the de-duplication of simple family applications are calculated according to the receiving office
.
4) Deadline for statistics: August 31, 2021
.
5) If there is a special statistical caliber, it will be noted at the bottom of the chart
.

Full-text statistical description:

　　1.
Global paint competition landscape: Sherwin-Williams VS PPG

　　Sherwin-Williams and PPG are two of the leading companies in the global coatings industry
.
According to the market share of global coatings industry companies based on the statistics of the coating industry, Sherwin-Williams and PPG's global market share of coatings ranks the top two; Sherwin-Williams global market share is 9.
78%; PPG's global market share is 7.
37%
.

　　2.
Sherwin-Williams VS PPG coating technology layout comparison

　　(1) Comparison of patent applications and PCT applications: PPG is far ahead

　　Although PPG's market share ranks second, in terms of the number of paint patent applications, the total number of PPG paint patent applications is far ahead, reaching 1,286, and the number of PCT patent applications is 56; Sherwin-Williams total number of patent applications is 316
.

　　Note: PPG Industries Ohio is a subsidiary of PPG Industries, the parent company’s coating patents are all filed under the name of the subsidiary, the same below!

　　In terms of trends, from 2010 to 2020, PPG applied for more patents in the coating field than Sherwin-Williams every year.
In 2014, the gap between the two was the largest.
There were 114 patent applications for PPG coatings, while Sherwin-William only had 34
.

　　In 2020, the number of patent applications for PPG coatings is 80, and the number of patent applications for Sherwin-Williams coatings is 15
.
From January to August 2021, the number of patent applications for PPG coatings is 24, and the number of patent applications for Sherwin-Williams coatings is 4
.

　　(2) Patent market value comparison: PPG patent market value is higher

　　The total value of PPG coating patents is higher than that of Sherwin-Williams.
The total value of PPG coating patents is US$80,094,400, which is about 3.
5 times that of Sherwin-Williams
.
In terms of the distribution of patent value, the value of most of PPG's coating patents is mainly concentrated in the range of US$1-3 million; the value of most of Sherwin-Williams coating patents is mainly concentrated in the value of US$30,000-300,000
.

　　(3) Regional comparison of patent applications: the United States is the main layout area for the two

　　At present, the coating patent application areas of PPG and Sherwin-Williams are mainly concentrated in the United States, and the number of coating patents applied by the two in the United States is 729 and 370 respectively
.

　　Explanation of statistical caliber: Perform statistics according to the de-duplication rule that shows a public text for each application, and select the latest text on the public day for calculation
.

　　(4) Comparison of patent types: both are based on invention patents, and neither has utility model patents

　　PPG coating patent applications are mainly for invention patents.
There are as many as 1285 invention patents and only 1 design; Sherwin-Williams has 294 invention patents, and there are 22 more design patents than PPG; neither of them has utility model patents.

.

　　(5) Comparison of patented technology composition: the first major subdivision of the layout of the two is the same

　　At present, "coating composition characterized by its physical properties or the effect it produces, such as paint, varnish or natural paint; filler paste [5] [2006.
01]" is the first major coating technology of Sherwin-Williams and PPG.
According to the distribution field, the two patent applications in this field are 3015 and 94 respectively
.
The layout of the other key subdivision coating technologies of the three is as follows:

　　From the perspective of the focus of coating patents, the current focus of PPG's coating patents is obvious, which mainly focuses on compositions, polymers, mixtures and reaction products, etc.
; Sherwin-Williams coating patents focus mainly on compositions and polymers
.

　　(6) Comparison of key patent layouts: PPG key patents have been cited more frequently

　　In terms of key patent layout, PPG’s key patent layout is "post-processing nano-level powders and methods for such post-processing".
This patent has been cited 232 times, and the patent family size is 12
.
Sherwin-William's key layout patent is "Multilayer packaging with barrier properties".
This patent has been cited 103 times, and the patent family size is 2 items
.
On the whole, PPG's key layout patents have more patent citations than Sherwin-Williams
.

　　Note: ① When the analysis preferences are selected as [All search results (not grouped)], [Display a public text for each application] and [One patent representative for each group of PatSnap family], the patent family of this chart uses the PatSnap family and chooses to publish The latest text calculation of the day
.

　　②When analyzing the preference selection [One patent representative for each group of simple family], [One patent representative for each group of INPADOC family], this chart patent family uses the set de-duplication method, and selects the latest text calculation on the publication date
.

　　(7) Summary of Patent Innovation Strategy

　　On the whole, PPG coating technology has comparative advantages in terms of quantity growth and market promotion, while Sherwin-Williams coating technology has comparative advantages in terms of internationalization, diversification, quality improvement, specialization, value and academic driving
.
The two coating technologies are comparable in terms of market promotion
.

　　The above data refers to the "China Coating Industry Market Demand Forecast and Investment Strategic Planning Analysis Report" by the Qianzhan Industry Research Institute.
At the same time, the Qianzhan Industry Research Institute also provides industry big data, industry research, industry chain consulting, industry map, industry planning, park planning, and industry Solutions for investment promotion, IPO fundraising and investment feasibility studies, and prospectus writing
.

　　Original title: Exclusive! Sherwin-Williams VS PPG coating technology layout comparison (with patent total comparison, cooperation application comparison, key patent layout comparison, etc.
)

This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.