echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Urinary System > 【2022 ESMO】Excellence Patients with PSA≤0.2ng/ml after novel endocrine therapy mHSPC have a more significant survival benefit

    【2022 ESMO】Excellence Patients with PSA≤0.2ng/ml after novel endocrine therapy mHSPC have a more significant survival benefit

    • Last Update: 2022-10-03
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    *For medical professionals only


    The 2022 European Society for Internal Oncology (ESMO) Annual Meeting was held
    in Paris from September 9 to 13 local time.

    At this ESMO conference, many new data in the field of oncology were announced, including a number of heavy research results
    in the field of urological tumors.

    This paper mainly shares two research advances related to the effect of PSA levels and intensive therapy on the prognosis of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in the field of prostate cancer, and invites Professor Luo Guangheng from Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital to conduct in-depth interpretation
    .



    01

    PEACE-1 Study:

    PSA levels at 8 months have a significant effect on prognosis in patients with mHSPC[1].



    PEACE-1 studies have demonstrated that combined with abirtrolone on the basis of ADT or ADT+ docetaxel can significantly extend the overall survival (OS)
    of mHSPC patients.

    This study analyzed the correlation between PSA levels at 8 months in mHSPC patients in the PEACE-1 study and radiographically progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS (PSA group cutoff values were 0.
    2 ng/ml and 4 ng/ml).


    The median follow-up was 4.
    4 years
    .



    The results showed (Figure 1) that no matter what treatment was taken, rPFS was significantly prolonged compared with OS in mHSPC patients with PSA >< 0.
    2 ng/ml compared with OS, and rPFS was significantly prolonged compared with OS at 8 months, and rPFS was 3.
    7 years in ADT+ docetaxel group, 4.
    7 years in ADT+ docetam + abiraterone group, and OS was not achieved; PSA < mHSPC patients with 4 ng/ml regardless of treatment.
    rPFS was also significantly longer than PSA >4 ng/ml compared to OS; In addition, mHSPC patients with 8-month PSA < 0.
    2 ng/ml also benefited more significantly
    from rPFS and OS than PSA< 4 ng/ml.



    Figure 1 rPFS versus OS in patients with different PSA levels at mHSPC at 8 months


    The above results can be concluded that the PSA level of 8 months has a significant effect on the prognosis of mHSPC patients, and patients with PSA can be reduced to less than 0.
    2 ng/ml have a more significant rPFS and OS benefit
    .



    02

    Post-analysis of ARCHES studies:

    The overall survival of mHSPC patients who received ADT treatment and whose PSA dropped to different levels before enrolment[2].



    In the ARCHES study, more than 90% of mHSPC patients received ADT prior to enrollment and achieved varying levels of PSA (≤0.
    2 μg/L, 0.
    2−4 μg/L, and >4 μg/L).


    Among them, a total of 1045 patients who had received ADT before enrollment, the median treatment time was 1.
    6 months, 133 patients had a PSA ≤ 0.
    2 μg/L, 372 PSA 0.
    2-4 μg/L, and 540 > 4 μg/L
    .

    In this post-mortem analysis, the differences
    in OS between Enza combined ADT and ADT in patients receiving ADT before enrollment were observed and compared in the three PSA groupings according to PSA groupings that reached different levels.



    The results showed (Figure 2) that three groups of patients with ADT treatment with PSA≤0.
    2 μg/L, PSA 0.
    2-4 μg/L, and > 4 μg/L showed a longer OS benefit with enzaluride plus ADT treatment than ADT alone, and the risk of death was reduced by 52%, 46%, and 35%,
    respectively.



    Figure 2 OS results (A: ≤0.
    2 μg/L, B: 0.
    2−4 μg/L, C: >4 μg/L)


    The above results show that mHSPC patients who have previously received ADT treatment and whose PSA can be reduced to less than 0.
    2 ng/ml can still bring them longer survival benefits
    by receiving intensive treatment.


    03

    Expert reviews


    mHSPC refers to metastatic prostate cancer that has a therapeutic effect on ADT[3
    ].

    Once prostate cancer metastasizes, if not treated in a timely and effective manner, it will rapidly progress to the terminal mCRPC stage of prostate cancer, and the survival time of patients will be greatly shortened, so delaying the progress of mHSPC patients to the castration resistance stage and thereby prolonging the survival of patients is an important treatment strategy [4].


    Since 2015, a growing number of ADT-based combination regimens have emerged in the mHSPC phase, which can significantly delay patient progression and thereby extend overall survival, including docetaxel chemotherapy and novel endocrine therapies such as abitron and apatamide [5, 6, 7].


    In the actual clinical diagnosis and treatment process, clinical experts will also have some questions, including whether the better PSA control means that the patient's survival benefit is longer.
    Was the previous use of ADT alone to treat well-controlled PSA, and the immediate transition to novel endocrine combination therapy, further prolong their survival? The latest findings at this ESMO conference give us some tips
    .


    PSA has always been one of the most concerned indicators for both clinicians and patients in the treatment of prostate cancer, as early as the 2006 SWOG 9346 study began to explore the relationship between the level of PSA decline and the overall survival of patients, and the study found that the overall survival benefit of patients with PSA drop below 0.
    2 ng/ml was more significant [8].


    The same results were found in later CHARRTED studies[5], LATITUDE studies[6], TITAN studies[7], and PEACE-1 studies published at this conference, where mHSPC patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy or novel endocrine therapies such as apatamide and abidolone were able to achieve PSA drops of 0.
    2 ng/ Below ml, overall survival is further extended, and overall quality of life is better than in patients with a lack of deep PSA decline [9
    ].

    So what are the advantages and disadvantages of several existing combination treatment options to reduce PSA to 0.
    2 ng/ml? In a real-world study last year, apatamide showed that patients treated with mHSPC had a higher proportion of PSAs falling to <0.
    2 ng/mL than abiraterone and enzalumide [10].


    These results suggest that in the process of treating mHSPC patients, whether the patient's PSA level can drop to 0.
    2ng/ml deserves our attention, and choosing a treatment plan that is more likely to reduce PSA to less than 0.
    2ng/ml can further extend the patient's survival time while ensuring their quality of
    life.



    In the actual clinical diagnosis and treatment process, mHSPC patients need to consider not using new endocrine drugs after diagnosis, and may not be able to obtain new endocrine drugs for a while and use ADT first; Or the doctor may first use ADT to verify that the patient is sensitive enough for endocrine therapy, then it brings us a question for the clinical treatment of prostate cancer, that is, in patients who have only used ADT treatment in the past, if the PSA can be controlled below 0.
    2ng/ml, then do we still need to combine with new endocrine therapy? This ESMO conference is a good answer for us, previously received ADT treatment, no matter what level PSA drops (even if it falls below 0.
    2ng/ml), intensive treatment combined with new endocrine therapy will bring greater survival benefits
    to patients.

    The latest international guidelines, EAU guidelines[11], and the NCCN guidelines[12] also further highlight ADT-based combination therapy as the standard treatment strategy
    for the mHSPC phase in the 2022 edition of the update.

    In summary, in the clinical diagnosis and treatment process, mHSPC patients are treated with ADT first, regardless of what factors are used, and the PSA reduction is how to immediately switch to combined with new endocrine therapy in the case of conditions can bring greater survival benefits
    .



    Expert profile

    Professor Luo Guangheng


    Director of Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital

    Chief physician, third-level professor, doctoral supervisor

    Guizhou Provincial Management Expert

    Deputy Director of Guizhou Institute of Renal and Urinary Diseases

    Vice Chairman of Urology Branch of Guizhou Medical Association

    Leader of the tumor group of urology of Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital

    Member of the Minimally Invasive Science Group of the Urology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association

    Member of the American Society of Urology

    He is a member of the Urology Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association

    Urinary Tract Repair at the Urology Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association

    Deputy leader of the collaboration group

    Member of the Editorial Board of the Chinese Journal of Urology

    Corresponding Editorial Board Member of Chinese Medical Journal


    References

    [1].
    Abstract 1361MO, 2022 ESMO Congress

    [2].
    Abstract 1398P, 2022 ESMO Congress

    [3].
    2021 CSCO Prostate Cancer Guidelines

    [4].
    2021 Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of urological diseases in China

    [5].
    Sweeney CJ et al.
    Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.
    N Engl J Med.
    2015; 373:737-46.

    [6].
    Fizazi K, et al.
    Lancet Oncol.
    Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.
    2019; 20(5):686-700.

    [7].
    Chi KN et al.
    Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.
    N Engl J Med.
    2019; 381 (1):13-24.

    [8].
    Hussain M, et al.
    J Clin Oncol.
    2006 Aug 20; 24(24):3984-90.

    [9].
    Small EJ, et al.
    Presented at ASCO-GU 2022.

    [10].
    Pilon D, et at.
    Presented at AMCP Nexus; October 18-21, 2021.

    [11].
    EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP_SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-2022

    [12].
    NCCN guidelines prostate 2022 V3


    *This article is for the sole purpose of providing scientific information to medical professionals and does not represent the views of this platform

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.