echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Anesthesia Topics > 【Anesthesia hot spot】Prediction of difficult mask ventilation

    【Anesthesia hot spot】Prediction of difficult mask ventilation

    • Last Update: 2023-01-01
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Difficult mask ventilation prediction


    Case format: retrospective case analysis


    The patient, a 71-year-old male, 178 cm tall and weighing 106 kg, was scheduled to undergo left carotid endarterectomy due to carotid artery stenosis
    .
    Fifteen years ago, the patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and recovered well without cardiovascular symptoms
    .
    Preoperative snoring and intermittent use of a continuous positive pressure ventilation device
    .
    History of smoking for 52 years, one box
    per day.
    Medications include metoprolol 50 mg/day and aspirin
    .
    Preoperative ECG shows nonspecific T wave changes and sinus rhythm
    .
    The patient's blood pressure was 152/84 mmHg and the heart rate was 55 beats per minute
    .
    Airway examination shows airway Mallampati grade II, mild cervical spine mobility, beard, and 5 cm
    between the nail and chin.

    Pre-induction monitoring includes ECG, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure, 12-cade EEG
    .
    Midazolam 2 mg intravenously, fentanyl 100 ug, propofol 100 mg for anesthesia induction, and rocuronium bromide 70 mg to provide muscle relaxation for endotracheal intubation
    .
    After induction, mask ventilation is difficult, and the condition improves significantly with inhalopharyngeal airway
    .
    The rigid direct laryngoscope is equipped with a 3.
    5-gauge laryngoscopic peep film that only sees the tip
    of the epiglottis.
    Reposition the entrance pharyngeal airway to continue mask ventilation
    .
    Two more attempts at direct laryngoscopy intubation failed
    .
    A flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope was used to successfully insert a 7.
    5mm inner diameter endotracheal tube
    .
    The procedure went smoothly
    .
    After surgery, neostigmine 4 mg and glycopyrronium bromide 0.
    6 mg antagonize neuromuscular blockade
    .
    Peripheral nerve stimulators show persistent tonic contractions
    of muscles.
    The awakening patient developed a choking cough, and the endotracheal tube
    was removed to avoid further increase in blood pressure.
    Arterial oxygen saturation at extubation is 100%.

    However, the patient does not return to spontaneous breathing after extubation and cannot perform positive pressure ventilation
    .
    The pharyngeal airway is then placed, and there is no spontaneous breathing
    based on end-expiratory carbon dioxide and thoracic movement.
    Arterial oxygen saturation drops to 92%.

    When a laryngeal mask is placed, thoracic movement is visible and end-expiratory carbon dioxide concentration
    can be measured.
    Arterial oxygen saturation increases to 99%.

    After 5 minutes of assisted ventilation, the patient is awake and the laryngeal mask
    is removed.



    01 Discussion


    This case illustrates several priorities
    of airway management.
    Since there is currently no technique for airway examination alone, preoperative airway examination must evaluate several parameters
    .
    In this patient, difficult mask ventilation should be predicted
    .
    Mask ventilation can be obtained using the oropharyngeal airway and improves dysventilation after induction of anesthesia
    .
    In this case, direct laryngoscopic cannula is difficult and requires the use of a flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope
    .
    Rapid and proficient use of this technique reduces the occurrence of
    airway adverse events.
    In this example, mask ventilation up to laryngeal mask
    insertion was not possible due to premature extubation.
    The importance of the airway during anesthesia recovery is often overlooked, even if difficult airways are known
    .
    To avoid bleeding and excessive choking, extubation
    under deep anesthesia is usually desirable for head and neck surgery.
    However, depth of anesthesia is difficult to predict, and extubation under deep anesthesia usually requires careful planning to avoid serious consequences
    .
    If the endotracheal tube is removed before the patient is fully awake, there is a risk of laryngospasm and upper airway obstruction, especially in patients with obstructive sleep apnea
    .


    Airway management is an important responsibility
    reserved for anesthesiologists.
    It is also the most common cause
    of adverse outcomes in the administration of anesthesia.
    In the past 15 years, research on airway management and related technical equipment have developed
    considerably.
    Management of difficult airways is usually as important
    as endotracheal intubation.
    Three authoritative publications focusing on difficult airways reported that the incidence of difficult mask ventilation was 0.
    07%~1.
    4%.

    However, research on difficult mask ventilation is rare
    .
    Mask ventilation is the premier technique for post-anesthesia ventilation, so its importance is self-evident, and it has changed little
    over the past few decades.
    Management of difficult airways should be strictly divided into mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation, as the two techniques are not the same
    in application.

    Preoperative airway examination should evaluate mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation
    .
    Two studies estimated that the proportion of mask ventilation difficulty was between 1.
    56%~5%, and the probability of not being able to ventilate with a mask was 1/1500~1/600
    .
    In both studies, the predictors of dyspnea were consistent: (1) history of sleep apnea; (2) beards; (3) Age greater than 55~57 years old; (4) Body mass index> (26~30) kg/m
    2
    .
    Other inconsistent predictors are: (1) mandibular protrusion; (2) Lack of teeth; (3) The distance between the nail and chin is less than 6cm
    .
    The different findings in the two studies may be secondary variables
    in assessing difficult mask ventilation.





    The American Society of Anesthesiologists' implementation guidelines for difficult airway management provide for difficult mask ventilation as follows:

    1.
    For patients with oxygen saturation greater than 90% before induction of anesthesia, anesthesiologists cannot operate
    independently if 100% pure oxygen is used to maintain their arterial oxygen saturation greater than 90%.

    2.
    It is not possible for the anesthesiologist alone to prevent or reverse hypoventilation
    during positive pressure ventilation.
    Signs of hypoventilation include cyanosis, low end-expiratory carbon dioxide levels, weak breath sounds and thoracic movements, and haemodynamic changes
    associated with hypoxia and hypercapnia.
    (Table 28.
    1)



    Table 28.
    1 Preoperative airway assessment

    medical history

    Preoperative breathing status

    smoking

    snore

    Sleep apnea

    age

    physical examination

    Mallampati grading

    Range of motion of the neck

    Mouth opening

    Lip and tooth condition

    Nail and chin spacing

    Beard or not

    Body mass index

    Neck condition


    British Difficult Airway Association guidelines focus on unpredictable difficult intubation, and there is little
    information on mask ventilation.
    Following the publication of difficult airway guidelines by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in 1993, subsequent studies of difficult mask ventilation adopted a more reasonable definition of difficult mask ventilation, which increased arterial oxygen saturation to a low limit of 92% and proposed a rating system
    for mask ventilation.
    A stricter definition of difficult mask ventilation has the advantage of selective early intervention to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes (Table 28.
    2).

    Table 28.
    2 Mask ventilation grading scale

    Grade 0: Mask ventilation is not required

    Grade 1: Mask ventilation required

    Grade 2: ventilation using an oropharyngeal airway mask

    Grade 3: Difficult mask ventilation (inadequate ventilation, requiring two people to collaborate)

    Grade 4: Inability to ventilate the mask


    Mask ventilation is only one part of
    airway management.
    However, mask ventilation is particularly important
    because it is the first technique after the patient's loss of consciousness.
    If the mask is adequately ventilated, there is time to change airway management techniques
    , even if intubation is difficult.
    Hypoventilation leads to hypoxaemia, reducing the time available
    to change ventilation techniques.
    Therefore, airway assessment to predict difficult mask ventilation is important
    for obtaining other ventilation devices and techniques.


    The supralaryngeal airway, particularly the laryngeal mask, changes the definition of
    difficult ventilation.
    Because the superior laryngeal airway is particularly effective for ventilation in difficult situations, difficult ventilation is defined as the inability to establish ventilation
    with the superior laryngeal airway (rather than a mask).
    Anesthesiologists must be highly skilled in the use of laryngeal masks, and anesthesia training programs are responsible for ensuring that every student is proficient in the use of
    laryngeal masks.
    Learning from laryngeal mask application is divided into two stages
    .
    The first stage requires the use of a laryngeal mask 50~75 times so that the user can learn the principle of the laryngeal mask and establish ventilation in healthy patients
    .
    The second stage requires the use of a laryngeal mask hundreds of times, improving skills to manage difficult airways
    .


    02 Summary


    Airway management is the most important responsibility
    performed by anesthesiologists.
    At the end of formal training, anesthesiologists are experts in
    airway management in healthy patients.
    Techniques for managing difficult airways require extensive experience and skill
    .
    Although, a well-developed preoperative airway examination is not effective in predicting the true condition of
    the airway.
    However, preoperative airway assessment does provide guidance to the anesthesiologist when selecting ventilation techniques for specific cases
    .
    The anesthesiologist must be proficient in several ventilation techniques and be able to rapidly change ventilation techniques
    as the situation changes in clinical practice.
    Unless specifically contraindicated, extubation after fully awakening patients with a history of obstructive sleep apnea can avoid potential airway problems
    .


    03 key information


    1.
    Airway examination is a comprehensive assessment but is less predictive power
    .

    2.
    Difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation are different entities
    .

    3.
    The anesthesiologist must be proficient in several airway management techniques
    .

    4.
    Tracheal extubation and endotracheal intubation are also risky
    .


    04 questions


    1.
    Which systemic complication is most likely to contribute to adverse events in anesthesia administration?

    Answer: Respiratory complications lead to the highest
    rate of adverse events in anaesthesia.


    2.
    What are the predictors of difficult mask ventilation?

    Answer: Predictors of difficult airways include history of snoring, beards, body mass index > 30 kg/m2, and age over 55 years
    .


    3.
    What is the most appropriate procedure for morbidly obese patients who are unable to ventilate with a mask?

    Answer: In morbidly obese patients, the most appropriate form of ventilation when mask ventilation fails may be insertion into the supraglottic airway (e.
    g.
    , laryngeal mask).


    Notes/Guan Yong

    Typesetting/jingle balls







    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.