echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Ann Oncol: Issue 3 | Two standard complementary chemotherapy for stomach cancer and one standard chemotherapy for the efficacy of PK!

    Ann Oncol: Issue 3 | Two standard complementary chemotherapy for stomach cancer and one standard chemotherapy for the efficacy of PK!

    • Last Update: 2021-01-23
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    Complementary chemotherapy and/or chemotherapy is one of the standard treatments for stomach cancer (GC).
    Gastric Tumor Assisted Chemotherapy (ARTER)2 trial compared the prognostics of treatment with two complementary chemotherapy options and a course of chemotherapy for patients with stage D2, Stage II or Stage III lymph node-positive gastric cancer.
    in this trial, the subjects were randomly divided into three groups (1:1:1) and accepted: S-1 (40-60 mg, oral, 2 times/day, with 4 weeks/stop 2 weeks) for 1 Year; S-1 (with 2 weeks/stop 1 week) and O'Sullivan platinum (130 mg/m2, 1 time/3 weeks, SOX) for 6 months; SOX plus radiotherapy (45Gy, SOXRT).
    are layered according to the type of surgery (full or secondary total gastric excision), pathological station (II or III), and Lauren histological classification (diffuse or intestinal/mixed).
    end of the disease is 3 years disease-free survival (DFS), and a 33% reduction in the risk ratio (HR) of SOX or SOXRT treatment to DFS is considered clinically significant compared to S-1.
    February 2013-January 2018, 546 patients were recruited, with 182, 181 and 183 patients in the S-1, SOX and SOXRT groups, respectively.
    followed for 47 months and observed 178 DFS events.
    3-year disease-free survival rates in the S-1, SOX and SOXRT groups were estimated at 64.8%, 74.3% and 72.8%, respectively.
    control group (S-1) DFS HR is shorter than SOX group and SOXRT group: S-1 group vs SOX group is 0.692 (P-0.042), S-1 group vs SOXRT group is 0.724 (P-0.074).
    the DFS differences between the SOX group and the SOXRT group are not statistically significant (HR 0.971, P=0.879).
    adverse reactions in all groups of patients were expected and generally well-toned and controlled.
    SOX or SOX/RT-assisted therapy can effectively extend DFS compared to S-1 single therapy in GC patients with D2 excision, stage II/III, and positive lymph nodes.
    addition of radiotherapy to the SOX programme did not further significantly reduce the recurrence rate of patients after D2 gastric excision.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.