echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > ASCT is a Safe and Effective Consolidation Treatment Option for Transplanted Elderly NDMM Patients

    ASCT is a Safe and Effective Consolidation Treatment Option for Transplanted Elderly NDMM Patients

    • Last Update: 2022-04-26
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after induction therapy is the standard consolidation therapy for transplant-eligible patients with treatment-naive multiple myeloma (NDMM)
    .

    Data from two recent large phase III studies support the continuation of consolidation with ASCT in the context of current newer drug combination induction regimens; both studies excluded patients >65 years of age
    .

    In real-world practice, ASCT is not limited to patients under the age of 65
    .

    The European Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry study shows that the number of patients >65 years old who received ASCT has increased in recent years.
    During 2001-2005, 2478 patients aged 65-69 years who received ASCT accounted for 14.
    1% of the total transplant patients.
    In 2006 - 15.
    8% increase in 2010; a similar pattern was observed in those >70 years old
    .

    The results showed that there was no significant difference in transplant-related mortality (TRM) among patients of different age groups, which was 1.
    8% in patients aged 60-64 years, 2.
    1% in patients aged 65-69 years, and 2.
    4% in patients ≥70 years old
    .

    The Myeloma XI trial is a phase III, randomized, controlled study in transplant-eligible (TE) and transplant-ineligible (TNE) patients to explore the efficacy and toxicity of ASCT in elderly patients
    .

    Both TE and TNE patients in this study were randomized to receive either thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based triple induction therapy, allowing the investigators to analyze the outcomes of transplant-eligible patients across age groups, and to compare patients who received the same induction therapy.
    Outcomes in patients treated with or without ASCT
    .

    Study Methods Myeloma XI is a phase III, open-label, parallel-group, multi-arm, adaptive trial recruiting patients with NDMM aged ≥18 years
    .

    This trial was designed to reflect a safe population close to the real world; therefore, exclusion criteria were limited but included prior treatment for myeloma (excluding local radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, and corticosteroids), prior or concurrent malignancy ( including myelodysplastic syndrome), grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy, acute renal failure, and active or previous hepatitis C infection
    .

    Patients with TE and TNE MM were randomly assigned to triple therapy with thalidomide (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone, CTD) or triple therapy with lenalidomide (cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide) amine and dexamethasone, CRD); induction therapy for at least 4 cycles (TE) or 6 cycles (TNE) for optimal response
    .

    All TE patients were scheduled to undergo ASCT
    .

    The data cutoff date for inclusion in this study was May 31, 2019
    .

    Findings Outcomes of TE patients by age The median age of 2042 TE patients was 61 years (range: 28-75 years); 546 (27%) were 65-69 years, and 101 (5%) were 70 years -75 years (Table 1)
    .

    Elderly patients had a higher proportion of ISS stage III and poorer performance status than younger patients
    .

    The proportion of patients in cytogenetic risk subgroups did not differ significantly between patients in different age groups
    .

    Efficacy at the end of induction was similar across age groups
    .

    Elderly TE patients were less likely than younger patients to undergo stem cell harvesting at the end of induction
    .

    The percentage of patients who underwent stem cell harvesting decreased from 73.
    5% for those aged <65 years to 62.
    2% for those aged 65-69 years and to 57.
    4% for those aged ≥70 years (Table 1)
    .

    Stem cell harvesting and subsequent transplantation were not performed, mainly because clinicians or patients did not consider their suitability in the elderly group (Table 1)
    .

    Patients of different ages achieved similar depths of response at 100 days after ASCT (Table 1), with an overall ORR of 63.
    2% for patients aged <65, 65-69, and ≥70 years compared with the end of induction The ORRs were 62.
    7%, 64.
    5% and 63.
    6%, respectively
    .

    Patients aged <65 years had the longest median PFS, and PFS decreased with age (Figure 1)
    .

    However, this result was confounded by age, as more patients in the elderly group were pretreated with melphalan at a dose of 140 mg/m2, which was associated with poorer patient PFS (Figure 1)
    .

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics and treatments received by age group in patients eligible for the transplant eligibility pathwayFigure 1 Outcomes in patients of different ages who underwent ASCT Differences in outcomes between ASCT and non-ASCT in age-matched elderly patients At baseline, TNE and TE- The performance status and ISS stage of patients in the non-ASCT group were higher than those in the TE-ASCT group
    .

    The median PFS of elderly patients with TE-ASCT was significantly better than that of elderly patients with TE-non-ASCT or TNE (Fig.
    2B); the median PFS of the three groups of patients was 39.
    4 months, 9.
    7 months, and 16.
    5 months, respectively
    .

    Patients with TE-ASCT were significantly improved in PFS compared with TE-non-ASCT or TNE patients (ASCT vs non-ASCT, P≤0.
    0001, Figure 2D)
    .

    The same was observed with regard to OS: median OS was 84.
    1 months, 50.
    9 months, and 60.
    2 months for TE-ASCT, TE-non-ASCT, and TNE patients, respectively (Fig.
    2C) (ASCT vs non-ASCT, P≤0.
    0001 , Figure 2E)
    .

    Figure 2 After adjustment for outcomes in age-matched patients, median PFS was 35.
    8 months, 10.
    4 months, and 16.
    9 months for patients in the TE-ASCT, TE-non-ASCT, and TNE groups, respectively (Figure 3A)
    .

    The same benefit was observed in terms of OS after adjustment, with median OS of 79.
    8 months, 57.
    3 months, and 59.
    5 months in the three groups of patients (ASCT vs non-ASCT, P≤0.
    001) (Fig.
    3B)
    .

    Figure 3.
    Outcomes in age-matched groups of patients, including inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) reported 230 serious-related adverse events (SAEs) within 100 days after ASCT: <65 years, 65-70 years, and 70-75 years of age The incidence of patients in the group was 15.
    1%, 14.
    6% and 7.
    3%, respectively
    .

    Nine patients died within 100 days of ASCT: 5 were <65 years, 3 were 65-70 years, and 1 was 70-75 years
    .

    Forty-eight patients died within 365 days after ASCT: 34 were <65 years, 11 were 65-70 years, and 3 were 70-75 years
    .

    CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of ASCT in selected elderly patients with NDMM ≤75 years of age.
    Elderly patients receiving ASCT have comparable PFS and OS to younger patients without significantly increasing patient mortality
    .

    References Charlotte Pawlyn , David Cairns , Tom Menzies, et al.
    Autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective for fit older myeloma patients: exploratory results from the Myeloma XI trial.
    Haematologica.
    2022 Jan 1;107(1):231-242 .
    Review: Quinta Typesetting: XY Execution: XY poke "read the original text", we make progress together
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.