echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Medical News > Latest Medical News > Fauci refutes the "laboratory leak theory": the relevant debate has been politicized

    Fauci refutes the "laboratory leak theory": the relevant debate has been politicized

    • Last Update: 2021-07-29
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com


    China News Service, June 23.


    The British "Guardian" pointed out that since Fauci's e-mail was exposed earlier this month, the infectious disease expert has faced "increasingly hard-line right-wing and conspiracy criticism


    On June 21, local time, in a podcast "Swing" in the New York Times , Fauci reiterated his view on the traceability of the new crown that the new crown virus most likely originated from human contact with infected animals , Not from a "laboratory accident


    New York Times

    Fauci said: "As a scientist, you must form your own opinions and recommendations based on data


    In addition, Fauci also denied the allegation that he had cooperated with the social media "Facebook" CEO Zuckerberg to review the "laboratory leak theory" posts, and said, "Any thoughts on this point It's conspiracy theories and fantasies


    For Fauci's claims, Senator Martha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, expressed doubts


    However, US media reports pointed out that although Fauci issued a statement as early as May 2020, saying that "there is no evidence to support the'laboratory leak theory'", Republican lawmakers including Blackburn still criticized him


    No wonder Fauci lamented this in the program, the relevant debate about the new crown traceability, has become "politicized"


    The British "Nature" magazine recently said that the US hype "laboratory leak theory" is disturbing and may hinder virus traceability.


    The world’s mainstream scientific community has also pointed out many times that virus traceability is a scientific issue and should be carried out by global scientists, rather than being politicized


    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.